Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Where did I say the MLBPA was not also at fault? But, ultimately, the owners pay all the players.....if they wanted, they could pay more. It is up to them, ultimately. If I have to type every side of every discussion, and talk about everyone that might be at fault, Brock needs to add more storage....
  2. i've gone in and out, I can see binging it some day
  3. I would do this in a second.
  4. TOR looks decent, I guess....
  5. And Incognito's words just prove what I feel about Trump supporters.....sigh.
  6. If it all stays as is (hahahahahaha), I take Greene, I think. But, more reading is needed.
  7. He still does, but he wasn't quite as good last year....but I'd say he goes top 10, or top 5, if he's good next year. Legit.
  8. I think the ppoint is....those two aren't in groups that were allowed to do much in the past....
  9. Interesting! http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/rating-all-of-the-remaining-playoff-teams/
  10. Good argument. Not sure I agree, but I can see where you make sense.
  11. are there two typos here?
  12. couldn't disagree more. Most ex jocks are terrible at this stuff. So, you don't like Olney or KLAW or any other person that hasn't played?
  13. Other than opposing it every step of the way, and other than this is exactly how businesses talk when they don't want to pay more, sure. This is 100% how businesses make it sound like they just can't figure out how to pay more....which is a lie, of course.
  14. He's not old for a catching prospect, they move at a different rate than others. And, he's consistently, quickly, moved up since he was drafted out of college.
  15. got it, thanks, have a great day!
  16. I think it is different for a candidate, than a party, but good point.
  17. Agreed. I really like him in the bullpen a lot. A real lot. I really wish he had been up last year, when they needed bullpen help.
  18. he's 21...in AA....I think he has a bit of time...I still can't find a scout that doesn't like his stuff. Agreed on Diaz. he is either an elite hitter, or he's not in the majors.
  19. It is a good positive, imo, that there are some legit candidates here....and that one of them was so bad earlier in the year (and so good later) that it would have been laughable back then to even consider him....but now it is not. I probably also vote Kepler, but if Polanco had been up longer, probably him....I think...maybe.
  20. He was pretty bad against righties. I don't know anything about the future, but you can look at the past and make predictions....I would be shocked if Rogers is a good MLB SP. As for the catching, I think working with pitchers, understanding umpires, etc....all the non-game stuff, I think they need at least 1 guy that knows how that works. I could be wrong, but that's my thought. Also, neither even has, what 50 ABs in AAA? I am all for "play the young guys" as a strategy, you can do that with a young guy as the starter.
  21. This one? https://www.pencollectorsofamerica.com/ Or this one? http://plymouthgin.com/cocktails/the-pennant/
  22. He pitched in AA in his age 21 season, and was good, not great, at limiting runs given up. I think people are underestimating Stewart. I understand why....
×
×
  • Create New...