I remember Plouffe at SS, and I remember watching him throw 2/3 of the plays to first into the stands. I do agree with your assertion that CF starts with fielding. Parms at CF would be bad, no doubt, but right now Hicks' development and strength of the future team is taking a back seat to the current stop gap needs of a team that isn't going to do anything anyways. Im not saying Parms is the answer at CF, only a better option than Santana. At least Parms knows how to play the outfield and isn't in the early MLB development stages that Santana or Hicks is at. If Parms struggles at CF, he's shown poise and maturity that leads me to believe that his growth won't be stunted. Last year I couldn't say that about Parms. I value Hicks more than Parmelee for the long term, and trust Parmelee won't be ruined in the short term struggles of MLB futility. OK, there are worse things than Hicks on the roster. Correia, Kubel, Burton, and Guerrier will/should all be gone by season's end. As for Nolasco, and Mauer (Mauer not mentioned but falls in the same category); just because you pay a lot of money, doesn't mean you will get more output. Just like the sunk cost of injuries, so is free agency. I expect more out of both players, but realistically free agents such as those two aren't going to out perform their career averages over the life of the contract, and will regress towards the end. Nolasco over his career had been a statistically median innings eater. Now he's a highly paid statistically median innings eater. Mauer was a very high obp slap hitting, some gap power doubles producing, catcher, then became a highly paid high obp yada yada yada, and is now a highly paid first basemen who is the same guy we've always known, now on the backside of his career. Hopefully this season so far is marked by injury and a healthy Joe Mauer will arrive some time this season, to improve his hitting to what we're used to seeing.