There is a lot going on here 1) just and equal economic opportunity 2) economics of crime 3) statistical sampling 1) we agree that economic opportunity is not equal or just among people of different races and ethnicities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/politics/black-white-us-financial-inequality/index.html 2) when you don’t have a lot to lose, the deterrence of jail isn’t very effective. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1573446399300432 3) you’ve no doubt read the theme of institutional racism in my posts. We’ve seen anecdotal evidence of it with the Floyd case. Hennepin county medical examiner, the prosecuter, the review board.... all of them tried to sweep this under the rug. If so many people were complicit in this murder, how are statistics compiled in the links? By the very police who are already biased. There’s nothing random about the sample. If police go out of their way to find crime in a specific population, that is where it will be found. So we have a group of people who felt (and are) discriminates against, that now in the days of Covid-19 being treated expendable by their employers and government institutions, and then Chauvin murdered Floyd. No wonder people are protesting. I’m angry too. So how do we move forward? It’s clearly not only one issue or solution. Comprehensive reform may not be achieved in our lifetimes. glunn brought up reforming the review board. The Civil Rights investigation is a start. Reviewing the War on Drugs seems like a good place to start. I like the idea of economic reform to go with it. How does this all go together?