Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

mikelink45

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,368

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mikelink45

  1. mikelink45
    I am excited to have Jorge pitch tomorrow rather than a cast off like Gee or one of the other revolving doors we have used. I really hope he turns some heads with a big performance. I also suspect that Busenitz will be back up quickly based on his success so far. I do agree that we could have used two different 26th man choices - one for each game since I believe the rules allow for different players to be designated for each game and right now Jorge contributes nothing to game one.
  2. mikelink45
    Four outfielders who are all defensively talented would be nice. Put Grossman at 1B/DH. I am afraid that Vargas just has not done enough to hold his roster position and the pitching staff continues to grow so we cannot just add another bench player.
  3. mikelink45
    I really enjoy this kind of update. It is disappointing to realize that all our attention and anticipation over players in the system is not shared by the larger national press, but still you give us some really good news to work with. I would love to see Felix really shine and force the Twins to think about him as more than a 26th man. It would be great to see both he and Gonsalves in the rotation and move on from Gibson and Santiago. Granite is a really interesting player and how the Twins handle him is intriguing. He needs to be rewarded with some MLB time and I hate to have to wait until an injury on the Twins to bring him up. Vargas has not produced so much that he has a protected roster spot and Grossman is the ideal DH and backup 1B with Granite rotating with the starting three outfielders we would lose no speed or defense.
  4. mikelink45
    Really good teams have excellent players stuck in the minors, but is that the case with the Twins? It would seem that the problem always is with pitching. If we cannot have decent starters we need to have 13 (maybe more) relievers. And when the relievers are not that good we need even more to throw on the fire. Berrios and Santana and then the roster falls apart.
  5. mikelink45
    The only thing we know for sure is that the Twins do not know what to do with their star talent, they bragged about his five tool skills and somehow caused him to be so messed up in the batters box that we are now down to fielding and baserunning. Who is at fault? So hard to tell, but such a shame.
  6. mikelink45
    If we need another starter this weekend, I would rather give Gonsalves a start than Gee.
  7. mikelink45
    I am intrigued by Granite, the way we are always intrigued by the second string QB. I do not know which of the outfielders I would replace with Granite - all are flawed. Buxton is in for Defense, but his bat still stinks and it is getting to be a long stretch of Mendoza line offense, Rosario has some power when he gets stirred up, but no plate discipline and a reduced defensive value, while Kepler comes in waves of good with lots of time in between. It might be our outfield of the future, but I do not thing those three would rank high if there was an outfield ranking for all the teams.
  8. mikelink45
    Belisle is terrible and it is more than the eye test - 30.1 innings pitched - 33 hits and 17 walks giving up 26 runs (with relief pitchers I do not care if the runs are earned or unearned) and 18.8% of inherited base runners scored. And a 6.53 era. Move on. Our other slick veteran reliever - Breslow - only has a 5.28 era. 29 innings pitched with 34 hits and 10 walks! And these are the best of the numerous pitchers that the team has added this year. Would we have been worse off if we had just rotated through minor leaguers? We DFA Melatokis and keep these guys?
  9. mikelink45
    All I want from our players is - fast enough. If they are stealing then they need to beat the throw, if a player is on base they need to beat the DP and get home. Fast is one measurement, but success is the most important.
  10. mikelink45
    One of the stats that just can't be corrected -Berrios had runners on, but was not allowed to get out of the inning (an inning he should not have pitched) and then we bring in Belisle - hit and walk - but no outs. Belisle gets credit for no earned runs, just an appearance and thus Berrios adds to his ERA since these players pushed the probability of the inherited runners scoring. Thus Belisle will continue to look better than a record that looks bad already. Belisle has been a mistake signing. My relief pitchers have more up and down years than most starters and his signing may have looked good in the off season, but it's time for him to move out of the way for better prospects.
  11. mikelink45
    Go young. We are building a team and all the dumpster grabs we have made this year have not been the reason we are having a good year. It must be something in the Minnesota air that has us continually looking out to find old Twins to bring back.
  12. mikelink45
    Bring them up. Imagine what we might have today if we could have had starts that did not belong to Wilks, Tepesch, and Turley, but one one of these three. We might have lost all those games, but we might also have a starter in the rotation who we could see as a long term addition to Berrios and Santana.
  13. mikelink45
    Nice essay. Sometimes we have to go back to the old scout format and look away from the metrics. The question is - is he doing his job - answer - yes. The second question is - do we have anyone better for the role? Answer - No. Go Kintzler. You are doing the job and we are winning. Your time will come, but for now, lets enjoy the ride.
  14. mikelink45
    I just came back from Marquette, MI and this game entertained me for most of the ride from Ashland home. What fun. This is baseball at its most enjoyable. I did expect an implosion many times, but Santana squirmed out of harm each inning
  15. mikelink45
    I'm not in much to take away from this four game series. I'm not worried about the hitting but the pitching gives me no hope Gibson can claim a moral victory but we need pictures who Step Up in the big games
  16. mikelink45
    Busenitz - good call up. He deserved it. So does Curtiss and a few more, but Wimmers? What is the affection they have with Wimmers?
  17. mikelink45
    When I look at our team entering a four game series with Cleveland - the team we are fighting for first place and the rotation is Turley, Wilks, Mejia, and Gibson I am frustrated. When you only have two good starters - Berrios and Santana - they cannot go in every series, but this is no way to tackle the potentially best team in the division. I am hoping for standout performances far above their norms because we need a split from this series.
  18. mikelink45
    The minor leagues are where we need to look and I will be happy when the FO turns off the waiver (dumpster) wire and starts finding out who we have in our own system. At 26 we should get players up or out. Reading the minor league summaries I cannot figure out why Rosario is the only one given a chance.
  19. mikelink45
    As I read these posts I can only think about the Twins choices for starting this weekend against Cleveland - Wilks and Turley against the team that we are trying to hold off for first place. Something seems wrong here. Okay Turley deserves a second chance, but couldn't they have arranged starts so that one of our other young pitchers could have taken Wilks place?
  20. mikelink45
    Wilks? No is my response - give one of our young guys a chance. What is the love affair with waiver wire pitchers?
  21. mikelink45
    I really enjoy these game summaries. Thanks for doing these reports.
  22. mikelink45
    I have a hard time with the draft because MLB has such a long delay before the satisfaction of seeing a person in MLB keeps us from really judging a draft for three years. So I wanted to see what to use for judging the draft and found this slightly old article http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1219356-examining-the-percentage-of-mlb-draft-picks-that-reach-the-major-leagues and it was constructive. The first 5 rounds give us a 33% and more chance of success in the majors. The last half of the draft is a collective 7% which means that those picks fill the minor league rosters and you hope for a surprise. So we ended up with SS, 3B, OF and three pichers in the high end of the draft. Now I will follow Seth's reports and hope for the best.
  23. mikelink45
    You took my response - good for you - we have a curve ball terror in Duffey. Everything says curve balls are the most important pitch in this era and the draft confirmed that. So why is Duffey in the pen and not in the rotation? Why aren't we continuing to develop him as a starter. It can't be because Gibson, Mejia, and Santiago are all sensational.
  24. mikelink45
    I think the Twins organization knows the talents and has them ranked by major league potential. I say take the highest potential for MLB with one exception when your system has an obvious weakness then shade the choices if you have a good option to fill a need. For most of us - especially me - I have know idea who these players are that they are choosing so I have to go by the ratings of TD, Law, and other services. They are not perfect but they give us some idea. When I look at positions pitcher is number one, just like QB in the NFL and you shade to that side. What I do not like to hear is that we are drafting someone because we can save money for later rounds. There is something special about the number one over all and with luck you will never have that pick again, so go for the potential gold. Yes players like Appel prove that #1 overall is not a sure thing, but if there is a potential for superstardom on the staff this is where it might be. The money saved on the signing of some agreeable player will not equal the eventual cost of signing the ACE. The potential for MLB in the last 20 rounds is 7% according to the stats accumulated over previous drafts so the fact that we have taken 11 pitchers in the bottom of the draft simply means we might be lucky, but expect to have full minor league rosters. It is only in the top 5 rounds that teams have historically gotten 33% of the choices to the majors. We may have been exceptionally good in our picks, I cannot tell and we will not know for three years, but I have not liked some of the comments I have read surrounding the picks.
  25. mikelink45
    I know there are lots of theories - mine is simple. Pick the best player you can get and put emphasis on the places your system is weak in. That is it. Wish I could give you lots of metrics, but I just want the best nine players we can put on the field at the same time.
×
×
  • Create New...