The University (like many around the nation) has different standards for consent than the legal system does. This applies to all students, not just athletes, like you attempt to claim in an earlier post. Implied consent is not enough. There has to be affirmative consent. The affirmative consent also has to be ongoing. This means that the video, even if the beginning were missing, would be able to determine if consent was affirmative and ongoing. Each new act, and each partner would need affirmative consent. The woman consenting initially, and then simply not protesting additional partners is not enough under the University policy. There is nothing new or controversial about a University having different standards than the legal system. At BYU, for example, students are not allowed ANY sexual contact.