Folks should remember that Gardy inherited a winning team, with virtually its entire lineup already set. Then he proceeded to have 9 seasons of almost uninterrupted contention, plus a 10th season of expected contention in 2011. During those 10 years, Gardy probably never had a team as in flux as the April 2015 Twins, so it makes sense that his approach during those years would seem more rigid. Molitor may not have been a materially different Twins manager from 2002-2011. From 2012 onward, as his teams were worse, Gardy was certainly less rigid in many ways. The top of his lineups were generally fine given available personnel, and he dropped Hicks from the leadoff spot after 11 games in 2013, not unlike Molitor dropping Santana after 21 games this year. Dozier moved around the 1-2-3 spots, Plouffe hit #3 when he hit well, Mauer switched between 2-3, Suzuki and Santana claimed better spots when they were hot, etc. (And a true backup catcher hasn't batted 3rd for the Twins outside of 2006-2008, when Redmond did it while batting .307.) Closer usage was one area where Gardy remained rigid, but that's probably 2 extra appearances per month for the closer, not 2 extra team wins per month. I don't know if there's a measure for it, but I would have to guess that Gardy was no worse than average in rigidity among MLB managers. Molitor is probably a shade less rigid, but well within the same range in terms of fan-visible evidence (lineups, rosters, roles). Molitor's benefit to this team will primarily be in approach/preparation outside of the game itself, and hopefully in fresh attitude and culture late this season and going forward.