Carrasco had just put the first 2 runners on base in the 6th, nursing a 1-run lead against a dominant Gerrit Cole, and the batter due up had already tagged Carrasco for 2 hits that day. Trailing 1-0 in the series, with an off day the next day, I don't think it's unreasonable to go to your pen in that situation. Especially if you view your pen as a strength (although Miller faltered badly in this spot, which could cause Francona to approach it differently in upcoming games). Another factor is bullpen composition. Sure, Carrasco got pulled earlier than you would expect in a regular season game -- but the Cleveland postseason pen now includes Trevor Bauer. And Bauer has pitched in both games so far. It's not like they were deciding to pull the starter and make up the innings with some marginal reliever. That bullpen composition factor is similar across the league right now -- the Astros have McCullers in their pen, which is probably why they pulled Verlander when he ran into his first trouble at 102 pitches in Game 1. Likewise, the Dodgers have Alex Wood, the Red Sox used Porcello on his throw day, the Braves used Sean Newcomb on his throw day, etc. Teams are going all-out to win games, which is good. It's different than the regular season, it's different than past postseasons, but I don't think it's necessarily worse. Just have to re-calibrate. Personally, I think the aggressive pitching moves are kind of interesting. They slow the game down, but it's basically just an extra commercial break -- a couple minutes where I can do something else and not miss any action. Plus you can discuss the move, look up the pitcher and batter splits, second-guess the manager, etc. The far bigger problem, to me, is still pace of play, with batters stepping out after every pitch. That's not a solid break in the action, there's no tactic to question -- that's just dragging everything out.