Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Nick Nelson

Site Manager
  • Posts

    8,217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    56

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Nick Nelson

  1. At one of his pregame lunchroom press scrums on a mid-March day in Fort Myers, Terry Ryan was asked about his level of concern with the young and inexperienced players who would figure prominently into the team's plans this year. "I worry about almost every guy that comes up here," the GM said. "They have instant success and things are looking good. Sometimes when guys come back it doesn't fall into place, it starts to unravel a bit. We send them back."Ryan obviously has a lot of faith in his youthful core, and with good reason. But he's been doing this long enough to recognize that things don't always play out according to plan. "Every guy that's come through here with the exception of maybe a handful in the last 20 years has had to go back. Mauer didn't go back. Knoblauch didn't go back. Those types of guys." Of course, we'd all like to believe that transcendent talents like Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano are "those types of guys," but Ryan pointed to a number of players who needed to be sent back to the minors after their initial call-up – sometimes multiple times – before going on to have long and successful big-league careers. Included on that list are names like Torii Hunter, Corey Koskie and LaTroy Hawkins. A.J. Pierzynski shuttled back and forth between the minors and majors repeatedly back in the late '90s, and he's still playing today. So as we watch Buxton, Eddie Rosario, and even Byung Ho Park scuffle along, it's important to keep in mind that a step backward is sometimes required before taking two steps forward. I have a hard time envisioning a demotion for Sano but with the other three it's quickly going to become a consideration as the uncompetitive at-bats pile up. On a larger scale, it's looking like the Twins, as a team, will need to take a step backward before they can move forward. They've dug themselves a deep hole at the start of the season and being forced to send down one or more of their key young players, while replacing them with mediocrities like David Murphy, would almost surely peg this year as a developmental one aimed toward getting everything in place for a 2017 run. Perhaps that was always the most realistic outcome given the level of inexperience on the roster, but one can hardly be blamed for being impatient after a five-year playoff drought, or for feeling optimistic in light of the elite abilities of these admittedly green youngsters. Unfortunately, it looks like they're just not there yet, and neither are the Twins. Click here to view the article
  2. Ryan obviously has a lot of faith in his youthful core, and with good reason. But he's been doing this long enough to recognize that things don't always play out according to plan. "Every guy that's come through here with the exception of maybe a handful in the last 20 years has had to go back. Mauer didn't go back. Knoblauch didn't go back. Those types of guys." Of course, we'd all like to believe that transcendent talents like Byron Buxton and Miguel Sano are "those types of guys," but Ryan pointed to a number of players who needed to be sent back to the minors after their initial call-up – sometimes multiple times – before going on to have long and successful big-league careers. Included on that list are names like Torii Hunter, Corey Koskie and LaTroy Hawkins. A.J. Pierzynski shuttled back and forth between the minors and majors repeatedly back in the late '90s, and he's still playing today. So as we watch Buxton, Eddie Rosario, and even Byung Ho Park scuffle along, it's important to keep in mind that a step backward is sometimes required before taking two steps forward. I have a hard time envisioning a demotion for Sano but with the other three it's quickly going to become a consideration as the uncompetitive at-bats pile up. On a larger scale, it's looking like the Twins, as a team, will need to take a step backward before they can move forward. They've dug themselves a deep hole at the start of the season and being forced to send down one or more of their key young players, while replacing them with mediocrities like David Murphy, would almost surely peg this year as a developmental one aimed toward getting everything in place for a 2017 run. Perhaps that was always the most realistic outcome given the level of inexperience on the roster, but one can hardly be blamed for being impatient after a five-year playoff drought, or for feeling optimistic in light of the elite abilities of these admittedly green youngsters. Unfortunately, it looks like they're just not there yet, and neither are the Twins.
  3. Why are we assuming this is not what happened? Just because they announced the move this morning doesn't mean that's when they reached the decision.
  4. I just feel bad for him personally. He was a dominant closer for three years on terrible teams, then when the Twins finally appear poised to return to relevance, his body breaks down. It's not like he pitched through a long stretch of the regular season while hiding an injury. He had one bad outing and went on the shelf.
  5. The Minnesota Twins have placed closer Glen Perkins on the disabled list with a shoulder strain and called up left-hander Taylor Rogers from Class-AAA Rochester. Rogers was "coincidentally" the subject of Seth's Prospect Retrospective today.In spring training, Rogers was competing for a lefty specialist role in the bullpen and he lasted deep into camp before being optioned on March 23rd. Last year in Rochester he went 11-12 with a 3.98 ERA, 1.35 WHIP and 126-to-44 K/BB ratio over 174 innings. He pitched two scoreless innings in his lone appearance there this year. The 25-year-old has served mostly as a starter in the minors but profiles better as a reliever due to his consistent success against left-handed hitters. In Triple-A last season he held them to a .177/.209/.193 slash line with 55 strikeouts and five walks. Rogers now stands out as Paul Molitor's best option against tough lefty swingers late in games. Perkins showed decreased velocity in his two appearances, which included a blown save against the Royals on Sunday. Obviously it's an ominous sign that he's going on the shelf one week into the season, but hopefully some time off will enable him to come back strong with more life on his fastball. Presumably Kevin Jepsen, who served as the team's closer down the stretch last year, will take over ninth-inning duties for the time being. Click here to view the article
  6. In spring training, Rogers was competing for a lefty specialist role in the bullpen and he lasted deep into camp before being optioned on March 23rd. Last year in Rochester he went 11-12 with a 3.98 ERA, 1.35 WHIP and 126-to-44 K/BB ratio over 174 innings. He pitched two scoreless innings in his lone appearance there this year. The 25-year-old has served mostly as a starter in the minors but profiles better as a reliever due to his consistent success against left-handed hitters. In Triple-A last season he held them to a .177/.209/.193 slash line with 55 strikeouts and five walks. Rogers now stands out as Paul Molitor's best option against tough lefty swingers late in games. Perkins showed decreased velocity in his two appearances, which included a blown save against the Royals on Sunday. Obviously it's an ominous sign that he's going on the shelf one week into the season, but hopefully some time off will enable him to come back strong with more life on his fastball. Presumably Kevin Jepsen, who served as the team's closer down the stretch last year, will take over ninth-inning duties for the time being.
  7. The Twins could have hardly asked for a better finish to the month of March. During their last eight days in Fort Myers, they went 8-0, receiving strong outing after strong outing as their starters stretched out to season-ready form. Hitters looked to be ahead of the curve; six regulars posted a Grapefruit OPS above 850. Everyone was healthy. Then, the calendar flipped to April, and the team has been under some cruel hex ever since.During an unprecedented 0-7 start, the Twins have been outplayed so thoroughly that it's hard to remember a day where they actually did string together a rally or capitalize upon an advantageous situation. The game of baseball, with its marathon regular season, has taught us again and again that it is folly to draw conclusions or reach judgments based on a week's worth of contests. It seems fair to say that the Twins haven't played as badly during this opening stretch as they did during last year's 1-7 start, and as we all recall, that team rebounded to overtake first place in the division – albeit with an historic month of May. The season ebbs and flows, so there's little doubt that this dreadful slump will be offset, to some degree, by a hot streak in the relatively near future. There's no need to press the panic button simply because of the 0-7 record, even though the history of MLB teams who have gotten off to such a start is dreary. Eventually we will see some of the positive aspects of this club, the ones that compelled many people including myself to believe that they had a good shot at contending for a playoff spot, becoming more prominent. It will likely happen very soon. But what's alarming is that during this first week, the issues that have plagued the Twins and resulted in a steady stream of losses are the very same ones that we all envisioned in our "what if" scenario wherein this club was going to suffer a major backslide. When you looked at the most pressing potential problem areas coming out of spring, they shaped up like this: bullpen, K-prone lineup filled with inexperienced hitters, and Miguel Sano in right field. It'd be tough for any of those things to be playing out more poorly. Bullpen? That unit is 0-3 and has yet to successfully protect a lead. Each of the three back-end staples has blown a key opportunity, with Glen Perkins' crushing appearance on Sunday standing out as the most painful. Strikeouts in the lineup? Yeah, there have been plenty of those – more than even the most pessimistic skeptic could have guessed. The Twins entered play on Tuesday leading the majors in whiffs, with a team K-rate of 30.3 percent. In 2015, Baltimore's Chris Davis led all MLB hitters with 31.0 percent strikeout rate. Inexperience? It certainly appears to be a major hindrance. Minnesota entered the campaign with four players in the starting lineup who had less than one full season's worth of MLB at-bats; each of those players has an OPS below .540 and a strikeout rate of 38 percent or above. The worst part is that they don't appear equipped to handle these struggles and are pressing more and more with each unsuccessful plate appearance, creating a snowball effect throughout the batting order. And of course, the Sano-in-right field experiment has been adventurous, to be kind. The ball hasn't been hit to him a ton but he has still committed multiple gaffes, and his mechanics and movements on even the more routine plays suggest that he's a long way from being so much as serviceable out there. A long way. So while the amount of losing is unsettling – only one of the Twins' division-winning teams since the turn of the century has ever lost seven straight – it's the foundational roots of all the losing that really stings. I'm not talking about the typical frustrating miscues that always accompany a losing spell, like Eduardo Escobar uncharacteristically committing three errors in a week, or Kurt Suzuki popping up a bunt and sparking a double-play in the most facepalm-inducing moment of Monday's home opener. I'm talking about deeper symptoms that speak to the severity of this roster's flaws. Those, much more than the results, make it difficult to believe that these Twins are ready to take a big step forward. Click here to view the article
  8. Nick Nelson

    Woe And Seven

    During an unprecedented 0-7 start, the Twins have been outplayed so thoroughly that it's hard to remember a day where they actually did string together a rally or capitalize upon an advantageous situation. The game of baseball, with its marathon regular season, has taught us again and again that it is folly to draw conclusions or reach judgments based on a week's worth of contests. It seems fair to say that the Twins haven't played as badly during this opening stretch as they did during last year's 1-7 start, and as we all recall, that team rebounded to overtake first place in the division – albeit with an historic month of May. The season ebbs and flows, so there's little doubt that this dreadful slump will be offset, to some degree, by a hot streak in the relatively near future. There's no need to press the panic button simply because of the 0-7 record, even though the history of MLB teams who have gotten off to such a start is dreary. Eventually we will see some of the positive aspects of this club, the ones that compelled many people including myself to believe that they had a good shot at contending for a playoff spot, becoming more prominent. It will likely happen very soon. But what's alarming is that during this first week, the issues that have plagued the Twins and resulted in a steady stream of losses are the very same ones that we all envisioned in our "what if" scenario wherein this club was going to suffer a major backslide. When you looked at the most pressing potential problem areas coming out of spring, they shaped up like this: bullpen, K-prone lineup filled with inexperienced hitters, and Miguel Sano in right field. It'd be tough for any of those things to be playing out more poorly. Bullpen? That unit is 0-3 and has yet to successfully protect a lead. Each of the three back-end staples has blown a key opportunity, with Glen Perkins' crushing appearance on Sunday standing out as the most painful. Strikeouts in the lineup? Yeah, there have been plenty of those – more than even the most pessimistic skeptic could have guessed. The Twins entered play on Tuesday leading the majors in whiffs, with a team K-rate of 30.3 percent. In 2015, Baltimore's Chris Davis led all MLB hitters with 31.0 percent strikeout rate. Inexperience? It certainly appears to be a major hindrance. Minnesota entered the campaign with four players in the starting lineup who had less than one full season's worth of MLB at-bats; each of those players has an OPS below .540 and a strikeout rate of 38 percent or above. The worst part is that they don't appear equipped to handle these struggles and are pressing more and more with each unsuccessful plate appearance, creating a snowball effect throughout the batting order. And of course, the Sano-in-right field experiment has been adventurous, to be kind. The ball hasn't been hit to him a ton but he has still committed multiple gaffes, and his mechanics and movements on even the more routine plays suggest that he's a long way from being so much as serviceable out there. A long way. So while the amount of losing is unsettling – only one of the Twins' division-winning teams since the turn of the century has ever lost seven straight – it's the foundational roots of all the losing that really stings. I'm not talking about the typical frustrating miscues that always accompany a losing spell, like Eduardo Escobar uncharacteristically committing three errors in a week, or Kurt Suzuki popping up a bunt and sparking a double-play in the most facepalm-inducing moment of Monday's home opener. I'm talking about deeper symptoms that speak to the severity of this roster's flaws. Those, much more than the results, make it difficult to believe that these Twins are ready to take a big step forward.
  9. I take it Seth was not a fan of the idea to have Mauer switch positions? After all, a guy can get a concussion anywhere.
  10. I mean, if you want to remove all nuance from the discussion, sure, it's accurate to say that anyone on the baseball field can get hurt. We're talking about levels of risk. If you think a lifelong 3B like Sano isn't at greater risk of getting hurt while learning/playing a brand new position in the major leagues, I'd respectfully disagree. Obviously both 3B and RF involve much less risk than DH, where you're on the field only a fraction of the time.
  11. Berrios' command was off all spring, and now in his first turn he issues 4 walks in 5 innings, more than he had in any of his 15 starts at Rochester last year. I don't think we're at a point where we need to worry yet, but it'd be nice to see him start throwing more strikes in a hurry.
  12. At 0-6, the Twins are off to the worst start in franchise history. To say it was an ugly first week would be an understatement. Today, we’ll look at three noteworthy storylines that have emerged.* Last year, while Miguel Sano was enjoying an explosive second half with the Twins as a rookie, Kyle Schwarber was doing the same thing in the north side of Chicago. After joining the Cubs in mid-June, Schwarber slugged 16 home runs in 69 games, a debut that would have garnered more attention if it weren’t overshadowed by his teammate Kris Bryant. Much like Sano, Schwarber is a big power hitter who probably fits best at DH. But of course, those don’t exist in the National League, and so the 23-year-old was slotted to play primarily in left field this year. That’s where his season came to an abrupt end last Thursday. While going full bore after a fly ball in the gap, Schwarber collided with speedy center fielder Dexter Fowler, and writhed on the field in pain for several minutes before being carted off. An MRI later found that Schwarber had suffered full tears of the ACL and LCL in his left leg. Brutal. As a Twins fan, it’s hard not to look at this series of events and think about Sano. He’s bigger and faster, has considerably less experience in the outfield than Schwarber, and plays next to a rangier center fielder (who of course has his own history with collisions). The incident serves as another reminder that the risks of using Sano in the outfield extend beyond missed plays and extra runs. And while the Cubs have enough depth to survive the loss of Schwarber’s potent bat, Minnesota's lineup would be crippled by losing Sano for an extended period of time. * Of course, that’s not an easy argument to make right now. Sano has looked rough in the first week of his sophomore campaign, striking out in 11 of his first 22 plate appearances while sputtering to a .431 OPS. Incredibly, he hasn’t been the least productive hitter in Minnesota’s outfield. That distinction belongs to Byron Buxton, who looks flat-out overwhelmed. On the season, he is 3-for-19 with 11 strikeouts and zero walks. Everything is trending in the wrong direction. He’s watching hittable pitches sail by and he’s whiffing on everything when he does offer. Last year he swung through 13.5 percent of the pitches he saw in a rough debut; this year he’s at 18.2 percent. Buxton’s defense redeems him somewhat and it’s hard to point a finger at any individual in Minnesota’s struggling lineup. But when he’s this tied up, you’ve got to start wondering if his development is being hindered. Paul Molitor knows what he has in the 22-year-old, and he knew going in that patience was going to be required. But it gets trickier to be patient at 0-6, with the struggles this profound. * Was the surprising call-up of Max Kepler over the weekend a reflection of this waning patience? Historically, the Twins have often shown reluctance to disable players with “day-to-day” type injuries, but when Danny Santana came up with a lame hamstring on Saturday, the team wasted no time placing him on the DL and calling up Kepler, who had played only two games with the Rochester affiliate that he’d been assigned to two weeks earlier. Molitor said on Sunday that he doesn’t expect Kepler to have a prominent role during his time here, but the top prospect’s presence clearly increases the pressure on Buxton (not to mention Eddie Rosario, who’s batting .200 and swinging at 60 percent of pitches outside the zone). If the kid comes in and takes better at-bats, the manager will need to adjust accordingly. With Buxton and Rosario, who have a combined 20-to-0 K/BB ratio, the bar is not set high. And sure enough, in his first plate appearance of the year on Sunday, Kepler battled back from an 0-2 count and drew a walk. Click here to view the article
  13. * Last year, while Miguel Sano was enjoying an explosive second half with the Twins as a rookie, Kyle Schwarber was doing the same thing in the north side of Chicago. After joining the Cubs in mid-June, Schwarber slugged 16 home runs in 69 games, a debut that would have garnered more attention if it weren’t overshadowed by his teammate Kris Bryant. Much like Sano, Schwarber is a big power hitter who probably fits best at DH. But of course, those don’t exist in the National League, and so the 23-year-old was slotted to play primarily in left field this year. That’s where his season came to an abrupt end last Thursday. While going full bore after a fly ball in the gap, Schwarber collided with speedy center fielder Dexter Fowler, and writhed on the field in pain for several minutes before being carted off. An MRI later found that Schwarber had suffered full tears of the ACL and LCL in his left leg. Brutal. As a Twins fan, it’s hard not to look at this series of events and think about Sano. He’s bigger and faster, has considerably less experience in the outfield than Schwarber, and plays next to a rangier center fielder (who of course has his own history with collisions). The incident serves as another reminder that the risks of using Sano in the outfield extend beyond missed plays and extra runs. And while the Cubs have enough depth to survive the loss of Schwarber’s potent bat, Minnesota's lineup would be crippled by losing Sano for an extended period of time. * Of course, that’s not an easy argument to make right now. Sano has looked rough in the first week of his sophomore campaign, striking out in 11 of his first 22 plate appearances while sputtering to a .431 OPS. Incredibly, he hasn’t been the least productive hitter in Minnesota’s outfield. That distinction belongs to Byron Buxton, who looks flat-out overwhelmed. On the season, he is 3-for-19 with 11 strikeouts and zero walks. Everything is trending in the wrong direction. He’s watching hittable pitches sail by and he’s whiffing on everything when he does offer. Last year he swung through 13.5 percent of the pitches he saw in a rough debut; this year he’s at 18.2 percent. Buxton’s defense redeems him somewhat and it’s hard to point a finger at any individual in Minnesota’s struggling lineup. But when he’s this tied up, you’ve got to start wondering if his development is being hindered. Paul Molitor knows what he has in the 22-year-old, and he knew going in that patience was going to be required. But it gets trickier to be patient at 0-6, with the struggles this profound. * Was the surprising call-up of Max Kepler over the weekend a reflection of this waning patience? Historically, the Twins have often shown reluctance to disable players with “day-to-day” type injuries, but when Danny Santana came up with a lame hamstring on Saturday, the team wasted no time placing him on the DL and calling up Kepler, who had played only two games with the Rochester affiliate that he’d been assigned to two weeks earlier. Molitor said on Sunday that he doesn’t expect Kepler to have a prominent role during his time here, but the top prospect’s presence clearly increases the pressure on Buxton (not to mention Eddie Rosario, who’s batting .200 and swinging at 60 percent of pitches outside the zone). If the kid comes in and takes better at-bats, the manager will need to adjust accordingly. With Buxton and Rosario, who have a combined 20-to-0 K/BB ratio, the bar is not set high. And sure enough, in his first plate appearance of the year on Sunday, Kepler battled back from an 0-2 count and drew a walk.
  14. If there's one thing last season taught us, it's that we shouldn't put too much stock into rough beginnings. As we all remember, the 2015 Twins lost six of their first seven games, getting outscored 45-16 in the process. By the end of May, they were in first place. Still, given that Minnesota ended up finishing so close to a postseason spot, one can't help but wonder how differently things might have played out if they'd gotten off to a slightly less disastrous start. This weekend, they head to Kauffman Stadium with a chance to avoid another extended early-April swoon.The Twins know that their path to the the top of the AL Central goes through Kansas City and the defending World Series champs. Last year, the Twins went 7-12 against the Royals, and a dominating sweep that took place at Target Field on the final weekend put the nail in the coffin for their season. Obviously, it would be a big boost if the Twins could make a statement over the next three days. It would be especially important because of the starters that will be taking the hill for Minnesota. Ervin Santana, whose outing was cut short by rain on Opening Day, figures to get his first real start of the season in a ballpark with which he's quite familiar; of course, he played for the Royals in 2013, and had one of his better seasons. Then we get our first looks at the fourth and fifth starters, Tommy Milone and Ricky Nolasco. The makeup of the Twins rotation, which lacks elite talent at the top, means that the team needs to get quality production from the bottom half in order to have a shot. So the early success (or lack thereof) for Milone and Nolasco could loom large. Milone sort of is what he is at this point: solid, not great, but very consistently so. He had a nice spring marked by sharp command. The key for him will be spotting his pitches with precision and working inside against an extremely aggressive Kansas City lineup. With Nolasco, who knows what to expect. He's got as much to prove as anyone on the roster, and he'll get his first chance on Sunday. If he's commanding his fastball he can certainly get people out, and that would be big. From my view, the best-case scenario for the Twins is that Nolasco performs well over the first couple months and entices an SP-needy team to pick up a good portion of his remaining salary, opening the door for a higher-upside alternative such as Tyler Duffey or Jose Berrios. Heck, maybe Minnesota could even get a decent little prospect back in such a scenario, though I wouldn't hold my breath. Either way, I'm intrigued to see what these two back-end starters, who both have plenty of doubters, can do here in an early-season series that carries plenty of redemptive storylines. Which pitcher will prove the most this weekend? And will the offense rebound after striking out (figuratively and literally) in Baltimore? Click here to view the article
  15. Nick Nelson

    Proving Grounds

    The Twins know that their path to the the top of the AL Central goes through Kansas City and the defending World Series champs. Last year, the Twins went 7-12 against the Royals, and a dominating sweep that took place at Target Field on the final weekend put the nail in the coffin for their season. Obviously, it would be a big boost if the Twins could make a statement over the next three days. It would be especially important because of the starters that will be taking the hill for Minnesota. Ervin Santana, whose outing was cut short by rain on Opening Day, figures to get his first real start of the season in a ballpark with which he's quite familiar; of course, he played for the Royals in 2013, and had one of his better seasons. Then we get our first looks at the fourth and fifth starters, Tommy Milone and Ricky Nolasco. The makeup of the Twins rotation, which lacks elite talent at the top, means that the team needs to get quality production from the bottom half in order to have a shot. So the early success (or lack thereof) for Milone and Nolasco could loom large. Milone sort of is what he is at this point: solid, not great, but very consistently so. He had a nice spring marked by sharp command. The key for him will be spotting his pitches with precision and working inside against an extremely aggressive Kansas City lineup. With Nolasco, who knows what to expect. He's got as much to prove as anyone on the roster, and he'll get his first chance on Sunday. If he's commanding his fastball he can certainly get people out, and that would be big. From my view, the best-case scenario for the Twins is that Nolasco performs well over the first couple months and entices an SP-needy team to pick up a good portion of his remaining salary, opening the door for a higher-upside alternative such as Tyler Duffey or Jose Berrios. Heck, maybe Minnesota could even get a decent little prospect back in such a scenario, though I wouldn't hold my breath. Either way, I'm intrigued to see what these two back-end starters, who both have plenty of doubters, can do here in an early-season series that carries plenty of redemptive storylines. Which pitcher will prove the most this weekend? And will the offense rebound after striking out (figuratively and literally) in Baltimore?
  16. Awesome writeup. I'll be watching the slider very closely early on. Guessing we'll see Perkins tonight for the first time one way or another.
  17. Great stuff here. Well researched and very illuminating. Indeed, digging into this kind of stuff illustrates the challenges of turning around a bad farm system. I think that bodes pretty well for the Twins given the states of other organizations within the division.
  18. The start of the season is such a tease. The first game is typically a weekday affair that most nine-to-fivers have to miss, although multiple rain delays pushed this year’s opener into the evening. Then there’s that customary day off. It’s like giving someone a bite of ice cream and then putting the carton back in the freezer. Come on. Tonight, things really get going. The Twins are opening a stretch of 21 games in 22 days. There’s a whole lot of baseball on tap. This next one between Minnesota and Baltimore feels like a do-over, after weird weather and shortened starts turned Monday’s contest into a bullpen game. It seems fitting that in their – shall we say – second season opener, the Twins will be sending a starter to the mound who probably deserved the nod the first time around.In the grand scheme of things, the order of pitchers in the first two games of the season isn’t all that important. Maybe the Twins consider starting the home opener, which Kyle Gibson is in line to do next Monday, a more meaningful honor. But by all means, the 28-year-old has earned the distinction of top dog in the Minnesota rotation. Last year, Gibson led Twins starters in innings and his ERA (3.84) was lower than all but Tyler Duffey, who made 10 starts. While Ervin Santana was sitting out the first half with a suspension, Gibson was helping propel the team toward the top of the division. From start to finish, he was the rock in the starting unit. It’s impressive that the righty held opponents to a .257/.306/.387 line in 2015, but even more impressive when you consider that his 17.7 percent K-rate ranked near the bottom of the league. When hitters put the ball in play against Gibson, they batted .287, which is lower than the expected rate of about .300. That’s a testament to his sharp late-breaking pitches and the weak contact they produce. But contact is contact, and invariably when bat meets ball that much there are going to be hits, errors, runs. Since Gibson lacks elite control, the key for him to take his game to the next level is going to be making more people miss. Fortunately, there are promising signs on that front. In spring training, Gibson led the staff in strikeouts with 22 in his 22.2 frames. Of course, his stuff always looks nasty in spring training, and side sessions, but hasn't translated to an above-average whiff rate. Not yet. His strikeout percentage has risen each year he’s been in the majors, from 12 to 14 to last year’s 18. Now, three years removed from losing a season to Tommy John surgery and coming off a 2015 campaign that featured a career-high 194 innings and no significant arm issues, he looks about as strong as he ever has. Among the five Twins starters, Gibson is the youngest, the least experienced, the lowest paid. But for all intents and purposes, he’s the leader of this rotation, and tonight he’ll lead the team into the real start of the 2016 season. Click here to view the article
  19. In the grand scheme of things, the order of pitchers in the first two games of the season isn’t all that important. Maybe the Twins consider starting the home opener, which Kyle Gibson is in line to do next Monday, a more meaningful honor. But by all means, the 28-year-old has earned the distinction of top dog in the Minnesota rotation. Last year, Gibson led Twins starters in innings and his ERA (3.84) was lower than all but Tyler Duffey, who made 10 starts. While Ervin Santana was sitting out the first half with a suspension, Gibson was helping propel the team toward the top of the division. From start to finish, he was the rock in the starting unit. It’s impressive that the righty held opponents to a .257/.306/.387 line in 2015, but even more impressive when you consider that his 17.7 percent K-rate ranked near the bottom of the league. When hitters put the ball in play against Gibson, they batted .287, which is lower than the expected rate of about .300. That’s a testament to his sharp late-breaking pitches and the weak contact they produce. But contact is contact, and invariably when bat meets ball that much there are going to be hits, errors, runs. Since Gibson lacks elite control, the key for him to take his game to the next level is going to be making more people miss. Fortunately, there are promising signs on that front. In spring training, Gibson led the staff in strikeouts with 22 in his 22.2 frames. Of course, his stuff always looks nasty in spring training, and side sessions, but hasn't translated to an above-average whiff rate. Not yet. His strikeout percentage has risen each year he’s been in the majors, from 12 to 14 to last year’s 18. Now, three years removed from losing a season to Tommy John surgery and coming off a 2015 campaign that featured a career-high 194 innings and no significant arm issues, he looks about as strong as he ever has. Among the five Twins starters, Gibson is the youngest, the least experienced, the lowest paid. But for all intents and purposes, he’s the leader of this rotation, and tonight he’ll lead the team into the real start of the 2016 season.
  20. For many years, the Minnesota Twins were driven by philosophies that eschewed power, both on the mound and at the plate. When it came to pitching, they embraced the idea that allowing contact wasn't the worst thing, so long as they had hurlers who threw strikes and fielders who made plays. It worked for them at times, but as a result they have routinely ranked near the bottom of the league in strikeouts, and they fell embarrassingly far behind the competition in terms of velocity. In the lineup, they often gravitated toward "scrappy" players that could put the bat on the ball and apply pressure on the base paths. Sure, they've had some sluggers over the past couple of decades, but rarely have the Twins fielded lineups crowded with imposing bats, a deficiency that many believe has held them back in the postseason. Now, the era of Piranhas and Pitch-to-Contact is reaching its end. This has been in the works for some time, but in 2016, we'll really see their efforts to infuse more power into the offense and pitching staff come to fruition. One thing hasn't changed: As ever, they're focused on building this newly styled roster from within.Looking back, the decision to sign Byung Ho Park out of of Korea signaled a monumental shift in the organization's mindset. By making this move – evidently with no plans to trade Trevor Plouffe – the front office was essentially saying, "Defense is a secondary concern. We want more power in the lineup." Well, they've got that. This offense looks like a good bet to finish among the top five in franchise history for home runs. Whether you're looking at the starting lineup, the bench, or the minor leagues, the Twins have power to spare. And they have a young slugger at the heart of the order who I truly believe will be one of the most valuable hitters in the game. READ: Could the Twins hit 200 home runs this year? Even accounting for some potential areas of concern – sophomore regression from Eddie Rosario, continued introductory struggles from Byron Buxton, a difficult transition from Park – this team should score runs. Preventing them will be the make-or-break factor. The starting rotation is moving in the right direction, but still can't be described as a particularly threatening bunch. Kyle Gibson is the de facto No. 1 at this point and he's coming off a year that would best be described as good, not great. Ervin Santana and Phil Hughes are hot-and-cold. Tommy Milone and Ricky Nolasco don't offer a ton of upside. The good news is that, in Tyler Duffey and Jose Berrios, the Twins have better reinforcements on deck than most teams can boast. They like their rotation depth enough that they felt comfortable moving one of their most promising starters to the bullpen, where he lines up as a pivotal piece. Trevor May's presence is the only reason that the lack of any meaningful offseason action on the relief front makes any sense. He might have a larger impact than any free agent the team could have signed. READ: May's strikeout mentality is much-needed in the bullpen. But he might not be enough. Glen Perkins is trying to reverse a two-year declining trend. Kevin Jepsen had been more of a solid middle reliever than dominant setup man before coming to Minnesota. Casey Fien appears to be on the downslope. Fernando Abad is an iffy choice as the go-to lefty. Just like with the rotation, the availability of legitimate impact replacements serves to lessen the bullpen concern. Nick Burdi, Jake Reed, Alex Meyer, J.R. Graham, Taylor Rogers and Ryan O'Rourke are the kinds of arms that profile as meaningful in-season additions, and they'll all be just a phone call away. This dynamic is perhaps the most exciting aspect of the club heading into this 2016 season. The pipeline that the Twins have been putting in place over the past five years is now paying full dividends, with the majority of their best prospects either in the fold or right on the verge. Even if you don't love the composition of the Opening Day roster, there is a lot of quality at the highest levels of the minors. READ: After breakout season, Max Kepler looking toward next level That might not result in a playoff berth. This is a young and inexperienced club that surely has some lumps to take before reaching its true potential. With their quiet offseason, the Twins made a full commitment to letting the kids take the reins, and now we'll really get a chance to see what this group can do. This is a team that warrants more optimism and intrigue than any we've seen around here for at least a half-decade. It's a good time to be a Twins fan. Click here to view the article
  21. Looking back, the decision to sign Byung Ho Park out of of Korea signaled a monumental shift in the organization's mindset. By making this move – evidently with no plans to trade Trevor Plouffe – the front office was essentially saying, "Defense is a secondary concern. We want more power in the lineup." Well, they've got that. This offense looks like a good bet to finish among the top five in franchise history for home runs. Whether you're looking at the starting lineup, the bench, or the minor leagues, the Twins have power to spare. And they have a young slugger at the heart of the order who I truly believe will be one of the most valuable hitters in the game. READ: Could the Twins hit 200 home runs this year? Even accounting for some potential areas of concern – sophomore regression from Eddie Rosario, continued introductory struggles from Byron Buxton, a difficult transition from Park – this team should score runs. Preventing them will be the make-or-break factor. The starting rotation is moving in the right direction, but still can't be described as a particularly threatening bunch. Kyle Gibson is the de facto No. 1 at this point and he's coming off a year that would best be described as good, not great. Ervin Santana and Phil Hughes are hot-and-cold. Tommy Milone and Ricky Nolasco don't offer a ton of upside. The good news is that, in Tyler Duffey and Jose Berrios, the Twins have better reinforcements on deck than most teams can boast. They like their rotation depth enough that they felt comfortable moving one of their most promising starters to the bullpen, where he lines up as a pivotal piece. Trevor May's presence is the only reason that the lack of any meaningful offseason action on the relief front makes any sense. He might have a larger impact than any free agent the team could have signed. READ: May's strikeout mentality is much-needed in the bullpen. But he might not be enough. Glen Perkins is trying to reverse a two-year declining trend. Kevin Jepsen had been more of a solid middle reliever than dominant setup man before coming to Minnesota. Casey Fien appears to be on the downslope. Fernando Abad is an iffy choice as the go-to lefty. Just like with the rotation, the availability of legitimate impact replacements serves to lessen the bullpen concern. Nick Burdi, Jake Reed, Alex Meyer, J.R. Graham, Taylor Rogers and Ryan O'Rourke are the kinds of arms that profile as meaningful in-season additions, and they'll all be just a phone call away. This dynamic is perhaps the most exciting aspect of the club heading into this 2016 season. The pipeline that the Twins have been putting in place over the past five years is now paying full dividends, with the majority of their best prospects either in the fold or right on the verge. Even if you don't love the composition of the Opening Day roster, there is a lot of quality at the highest levels of the minors. READ: After breakout season, Max Kepler looking toward next level That might not result in a playoff berth. This is a young and inexperienced club that surely has some lumps to take before reaching its true potential. With their quiet offseason, the Twins made a full commitment to letting the kids take the reins, and now we'll really get a chance to see what this group can do. This is a team that warrants more optimism and intrigue than any we've seen around here for at least a half-decade. It's a good time to be a Twins fan.
  22. Do the Twins really think that Ricky Nolasco is their best option as fifth starter, or that Michael Tonkin is well suited as a long reliever? Maybe not, but placing the right-handers at the end of the rotation and bullpen buys the team a little more time to find out what they’ve got.When Paul Molitor stated early in spring he expected to have Tyler Duffey in the rotation, it signaled that he was considering pushing Nolasco to the bullpen. Presented with that possibility, the veteran made it clear that he would raise a stink. Alas, Nolasco ends up getting his rotation spot and Duffey starts in Triple-A. Some might see it as the organization relenting to a malcontent, but I see it more as trying to salvage an asset. Had the Twins decided to send Nolasco to the bullpen, it sounds like he would have implored them to trade him somewhere he could start. I’m sure they would love to do that, but he stands no chance of building any kind of market as a mop-up man. If, on the other hand, he gets off to a decent start in the rotation, and some other clubs suffer early losses in their starting corps? That changes things. He’ll never bring back much in a trade but at this point that’s almost immaterial. It would be hard to stomach this course of action if it meant accepting a clear performance downgrade, but that’s not the case. Duffey simply didn’t look very good this spring, and it’s not about the results. The change-up that he’s been dedicated to making a workable third pitch isn’t there. The curveball that he leaned so heavily on as a rookie isn’t having the same kind of effect, even by his own admission. I thought this Duffey quote, in Parker’s story from Fort Myers last week, was telling: “I think guys know it’s coming so they’re sitting on it. One guy took two fastballs. Didn’t even budge. I think he was sitting dead-red on curveball. So that’s where I’m going to have to adjust accordingly.” Sounds like something he needs to work on, and maybe not against major-league hitters. Nolasco throws a ton of breaking balls, but insists his fastball is his most important pitch, as it sets up everything else he does. And whereas Duffey’s key pitch was failing him, Nolasco’s was trending up. This development, much more so than their Grapefruit stats, makes the decision a justifiable one for now. If the veteran gets off to a clunky start while Duffey rolls in Triple-A? Then you make the switch, and at that point Nolasco can complain all he wants but really has no leg left to stand on. Perhaps then the Twins consider a more drastic option like straight-up release. Another hidden benefit of the decision to put Nolasco in the rotation is that it opened up an extra spot in the bullpen and might have saved the Twins from losing Tonkin. The vibe when I was in camp was that the 26-year-old had little chance of making the roster because the team preferred Ryan Pressly and didn’t have room for both. Well, now they do. And I believe it would have been a big mistake to risk giving Tonkin (who is out of options) away on waivers, especially with the questionable overall state of the relief unit. As the last guy in the bullpen, he’ll start out pitching in lower-leverage situations and being called upon after short starts, similar to the role filled last year by Rule 5 draftee J.R. Graham. But Tonkin is certainly more deserving of being in the majors on merit (he has a 2.65 ERA and 9.7 K/9 at Triple-A), and if he performs well he’ll have a chance to work his way into more important innings. Carrying him means they lack a traditional long man in the pen. Giving Nolasco a rotation spot means sending down a guy in Duffey who did everything to earn it last year. But the upside of these decisions is that the Twins might get a solid middle reliever out of the deal, and get a chance to recoup some semblance of value on their $48 million investment in Nolasco. The downside could be losing a few more games. But that downside only extends so far as the team's resistance to implementing quick changes if things go south, and something tells me that won't be an issue. They believe in Nolasco and Tonkin enough to give them one more look, but they're skeptical enough of both that the leashes will be short. Click here to view the article
  23. When Paul Molitor stated early in spring he expected to have Tyler Duffey in the rotation, it signaled that he was considering pushing Nolasco to the bullpen. Presented with that possibility, the veteran made it clear that he would raise a stink. Alas, Nolasco ends up getting his rotation spot and Duffey starts in Triple-A. Some might see it as the organization relenting to a malcontent, but I see it more as trying to salvage an asset. Had the Twins decided to send Nolasco to the bullpen, it sounds like he would have implored them to trade him somewhere he could start. I’m sure they would love to do that, but he stands no chance of building any kind of market as a mop-up man. If, on the other hand, he gets off to a decent start in the rotation, and some other clubs suffer early losses in their starting corps? That changes things. He’ll never bring back much in a trade but at this point that’s almost immaterial. It would be hard to stomach this course of action if it meant accepting a clear performance downgrade, but that’s not the case. Duffey simply didn’t look very good this spring, and it’s not about the results. The change-up that he’s been dedicated to making a workable third pitch isn’t there. The curveball that he leaned so heavily on as a rookie isn’t having the same kind of effect, even by his own admission. I thought this Duffey quote, in Parker’s story from Fort Myers last week, was telling: “I think guys know it’s coming so they’re sitting on it. One guy took two fastballs. Didn’t even budge. I think he was sitting dead-red on curveball. So that’s where I’m going to have to adjust accordingly.” Sounds like something he needs to work on, and maybe not against major-league hitters. Nolasco throws a ton of breaking balls, but insists his fastball is his most important pitch, as it sets up everything else he does. And whereas Duffey’s key pitch was failing him, Nolasco’s was trending up. This development, much more so than their Grapefruit stats, makes the decision a justifiable one for now. If the veteran gets off to a clunky start while Duffey rolls in Triple-A? Then you make the switch, and at that point Nolasco can complain all he wants but really has no leg left to stand on. Perhaps then the Twins consider a more drastic option like straight-up release. Another hidden benefit of the decision to put Nolasco in the rotation is that it opened up an extra spot in the bullpen and might have saved the Twins from losing Tonkin. The vibe when I was in camp was that the 26-year-old had little chance of making the roster because the team preferred Ryan Pressly and didn’t have room for both. Well, now they do. And I believe it would have been a big mistake to risk giving Tonkin (who is out of options) away on waivers, especially with the questionable overall state of the relief unit. As the last guy in the bullpen, he’ll start out pitching in lower-leverage situations and being called upon after short starts, similar to the role filled last year by Rule 5 draftee J.R. Graham. But Tonkin is certainly more deserving of being in the majors on merit (he has a 2.65 ERA and 9.7 K/9 at Triple-A), and if he performs well he’ll have a chance to work his way into more important innings. Carrying him means they lack a traditional long man in the pen. Giving Nolasco a rotation spot means sending down a guy in Duffey who did everything to earn it last year. But the upside of these decisions is that the Twins might get a solid middle reliever out of the deal, and get a chance to recoup some semblance of value on their $48 million investment in Nolasco. The downside could be losing a few more games. But that downside only extends so far as the team's resistance to implementing quick changes if things go south, and something tells me that won't be an issue. They believe in Nolasco and Tonkin enough to give them one more look, but they're skeptical enough of both that the leashes will be short.
  24. This is getting circular. What I said was that the Twins felt it was their only viable option. They weren't going to uproot a veteran like Plouffe or Mauer and it's not clear that would have been particularly wise.
  25. Obviously. I'm not sure what you're arguing against. When I made the comment about their hand being forced, I meant that once trading Plouffe proved not to be a viable option, they didn't really have any option other than putting Sano in RF. Clearly I'm aware they assembled the personnel that put them in their current position.
×
×
  • Create New...