I think that there are couple of issues here (and I am talking about the methodology not about the premise and/or the reasons.) - I think that as long as the government officially separates "race" from "national origin", the Latino black folks should be included in the stats. As a matter of fact, with the open definition of the term, if they are from the Americas (which includes Dominican, Venezuela, Colombia, Puerto Rico etc) and black, they are "African American". And sometimes it gets really really interesting on how to qualify this. A couple of examples with former Twins' players. Chili Davis: born in Jamaica, came with his family as a kid in this country and they settled here. He became a US Citizen as a kid and was drafted from a US high school. Is he an African American? David Ortiz & Tony Oliva: Amateur free agents from Dominican and Cuba and then became US Citizens after living for a while in this country. Are they African Americans? Not? Magically became African Americans when they got naturalized? The line is way way too thin. And there are a lot of Latin Americans who really feel discriminated upon, when the world "American" is applied to denote "US Citizens". Extremely ironic since the guy whom the world originated for (Amerigo Vespucci) landed on the West Indies and Brazil and not on the Potomac - My gut feeling is that this is more of a supply situation vs. demand situation. So I'd love to see them have a baseline of how many black (African American/Whatever) kids play varsity baseball in the US in high school and in College (as % of total) vis-a-vis the 70s and 80s. I suspect that they are fewer and that this is the root cause for that difference in the majors now vs. the 70s and 80s.