Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

PseudoSABR

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    6,120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by PseudoSABR

  1. Wow. I thought I was sentenced to the Twins News Team forever, a tag, iirc, I recieved as a carrot to quit be such a disruption (though I contributed "news/opinions"). I'll have to think of proper tag. Levi still has his. Does jokin?
  2. How do you hold to it eat it? Looks like it would take three people to hold the dang thing, and then eating it seems like a messy affair. Do they cut it up for you?
  3. I think people do care about corruption, though.
  4. I took four or five AP tests, and my folks were lower middle class; I just had no appreciation of the costs to them. (And all the credit I got, in math/science/political science, went to nothing since I became an English major)
  5. I think if the report is released, the Democrats won't hold impeachment hearings so close to another election. They'll trumpet "let the people decide" which would be a good move politically, imo. (Although, I'd rather have our president, impeached as I think his deeds fall squarely within the purpose of that constitutional, congressional power.)
  6. Right. When someone's foray into a conversation is to shame everyone; I question whether they seek to have a genuine conversation.
  7. Intentional southside reference to Hawk Harrellson?
  8. What the heck is a Boomstick? My imagination is filling in the gaps unfavorably.
  9. Convict, no. Impeach, yes. I want him out of office, or at the very least his wrong known publicly. I think impeachment is unlikely, but I think we'll discover serious wrong doing when the Mueller report is released.
  10. I think he cribbed the quote as I said up thread. It's 300 pages, lets see whats there, and whether it warrants impeachment/further House investigation. Basically, I am at where Adam Schiff is at, see his 4min speech up thread. If a four page summary is enough for you, that's fine, but don't tell other people what they should and should not be satisfied with.
  11. Good thing the game is going quickly I guess.
  12. My stance is I don't know. For many it will matter whether there wasn't sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt or whether there really was no evidence. You're telling people to move on on the basis of 4 page summary from a non-neutral party. And I don't need to read the report to argue that conspiracy is more difficult to prove than obstruction.
  13. Kluber is one of the best pitchers in the game.
  14. How'd you get the report?
  15. Conspiracy like any crime requires proof of mens rea. Conspiracy is more difficult than obstruction, because you have to show that mens rea of more than one actor was essentially the same.
  16. It totally is an issue his base love, no?
  17. The Scout's section looks like it was written by someone out of the 1980s.
  18. Yeah. If the Twins were running these five guys out on opening day, we'd have revolt around here, injuries notwithstanding. Imagine had Ramirez had been out?
  19. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1111214993293357056 The Smollet case is puzzling, but this is a scary federal overreach into powers specifically reserved to the states.
  20. Adam Schiff has a nice summary of Trumps wrong doings.
  21. Maybe they have, but the tongue-in-cheek Barr summary suggesting Trump isn't exonerated, but Mueller left it to Barr to decide to prosecute, suggests there's sufficient evidence of obstruction and intent. You also have the known facts of everything Trump has said through twitter and his comments to the Russian ambassador and on national TV that he fired Comey to get rid of the Russia thing. Let's not down play the known facts. I think this is a bit of white wash. Today, we also learned the Mueller's grandjury is still seated. I think we'll learn that Mueller was instructed to complete his report and hand off his investigation, which he did.
  22. Here, with Trump's Russia business dealings, I think it would be exceedingly easy. But what do I know.
  23. Right. Every news media use talking heads to the point of idiocy. But that's more a problem of demand, and insistence of news each hour of every day. But the major media, even with its problem, never jumped the shark with Mueller/Trump story. Perhaps its pundits did, and the satellite media, or the internet media did. But CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, even MSNBC, weren't creating fake news.
  24. Has it? Barr's BS about there needing to be an underlying provable crime I don't believe is in the statutory definition of the crime (which admittedly I don't have handy), as I said above thread, even if Trump didn't collude, he'd have ample reason to obstruct to preserve his business deals with Russia.
×
×
  • Create New...