This was touched upon briefly in a now dead thread, but the question was brought up: Fair question no doubt, I think "Satisfied" is the wrong word personally. Now, I am not saying the Pohlad's don't want to win, or are trying not to win, but I don't think its a stretch to suggest that maybe winning isn't and hasn't been the Pohlad's number one objective...well...ever. I would be happy if the Twins had an owner who valued winning at the top of their agenda. I brought up the Vikings as a comparison, Ziggy Wilf should be credited with trying to make the Vikings into a winner, he holds his coaches, GM's accountable for failures and is somewhat quick to pull the trigger on needed changes to right the ship. Now while it is a bit silly to call the Vikings a winning organization, it should be noted that in the last 20 years they have actually had a good amount of overall success, they have made the NFC championship game 3 times, and in two of those should have made the super bowl if it weren't for some all time classic Minnesota Viking chokes. In addition, the Vikings have made bold moves time and time again to make themselves competitive, have they won any super bowls, or even made a super bowl? Will they ever win a super bowl? Nope (it is our fate as Vikings fans) but they have been an entertaining team to watch and it is good to know that Wilf is committed to trying to bring a super bowl to Minnesota someday. With the Pohlads, nothing ever changes, they have basically said that the GM has the role until he doesn't want it anymore. That is sort of the opposite of building a winning culture as it shows a lack of accountability IMO. So the question is: Would you rather have an owner like Ziggy Wilf, or like Jim Pohlad?