Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

GNess

Verified Member
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by GNess

  1. This platoon approach will delay and diminish the full development of emerging players such as Keaschall. Is there any evidence that string reliance on platooning actually enhances productivity? The Twins performance the past few seasons seems to be strong evidence to the contrary.
  2. Adding Rogers is a good move, and he becomes a solid piece in the BP. I understand that many of the moves made by the Twins to reshape the team since the trade deadline were about the future. (2027 and beyond.) The BP last year was vastly superior to what is projected this year. That is indisputable. If Rogers, Bell and Caratini are the final significant additions I remain concerned but a smidge more optimistic about the Twins' prospects to be competitive as we approach Spring Training.
  3. Good argument for Gonzalez being among the top Twins prospects. He has shown production while even Jenkins' status is more about his traits.
  4. I know I would prefer they addressed it a way more likely to produce positive results. This seems like being active just to be active.
  5. I can't confirm this, but it seems to me almost every team has needs they hope to fill with promising, but unproven players with positive traits advancing from the minors. It's just in the Twins case they need a lot of production from a lot of emerging players to be even close to competitive. But I'll be hoping it happens.
  6. I agree with. the basis of this article. Value ultimately has to be measured by wins as opposed to individual stats of "shrewd" bargain free agents who produce something out of a very limited investment. Too often you get what you pay for or more apt in this equation you get what you don't pay for.
  7. Labor v Management is a part of almost all employment situations. However, the Twins going to the mat to save relatively little with one of their best players speaks volumes as to why they have been mostly stuck in self-imposed mediocrity for many seasons.
  8. Nelson Cruz, Carlos Correa were vets who led but they had much better resumes than Josh Bell. With those resumes comes some credibility, Doesn't mean Bell can't be an important voice, but it seems a lot to ask of a guy who may struggle to hit .250.
  9. Nice summation of the likely direction of the Twins in the short to medium term. I see Pohlad's comment about not being the time to invest to be deceptive. I can't imagine many teams list of Top 20 players don't include at least one player acquired via free agency. The Twins are not truly doing all they can can to build a championship level organization, Some would say they signed Donaldson and Correa and those didn't produce the results given the investment. But a few attempts that don't work out shouldn't see you abandon an important tool - they have had plenty of trades that didn't work out and they continue to trade. There is some hope that a real salary cap could change this dynamic, but that has eluded MLB so it is just speculation for now. Unless and until the Twins participate in free agency they have likely created a franchise ceiling that is below true world series contender.
  10. The Twins largely because they prioritize frugality, take what they can get. This amounts to placing value on veterans who have underperformed ( read as inexpensive) hoping against hope they will somehow contribute more than younger more talented players because of their experience. (So they don't typically rush players to the majors.) This is a strategy to be sure, just not a very good one which is rather disappointing. (But the FO may see it as their only real path.)
  11. I get your point. I would suggest although it was. in short bursts Lewis has had highly productive streaks over a few seasons. The talent is in there somewhere.
  12. Not sure all three have to emerge as legit + MLB. bats, because others could rise as well. Lewis seems to have the best chance to be a true difference maker. Following the progress of these three will be something of genuine interest to follow in 2026.
  13. OK with the potential viability of these projections. The BP which is still a big pain point is still needing a few notable vet arms added to the mix - do we think this is the external additions DF has in mind? Can only hope so, because if not the season is "projected" to go off the rails.
  14. Quantifying a "luck" factor in baseball or any other sport and connecting it to expected performance is suspect imho. Luck by definition has a large random quality that defies such predictive models. An athlete and/or coach thinking they can harness it or correct for it is headed down a difficult path.
  15. I am squinting hard to see the logic behind this move which creates a 1B "pool" of Bell, Wagaman and Clemens? Not very exciting. The Twins continue to fiddle around the margins which can only help the team in a marginal way ultimately.
  16. Your optimism is appreciated, but it is highly unlikely that all those unproven players to emerge as starting caliber players by 2027. Also in your forecast what did the Twins acquire for current players such as Lewis, Jeffers, Wallner etc. since they have disappeared from the line up? It would be awesome though if your projection is spot on!!
  17. If true, focusing on a loophole (such as the possibility of a shortened season) to contend for a championship is hardly commendable. But even to do this successfully would require the Twins to add some talent to the lineup and bullpen at a minimum.
  18. This list is solid evidence that the Twins can make difference-maker moves in free agency despite budget concerns, They must participate in free agency at some meaningful level. The list is also well constructed, but I think Jack Morris should be # 1 as he is a direct link to a world series title. No disrespect to Nelson Cruz who was outstanding!
  19. The quick list above of hyped prospects who failed or under performed to date should give even the most optimistic fans some pause. Draft and develop needs to be augmented by smart trades and free agent signings typically for a MLB organization to have sustained success.
  20. Trying to contend in the current AL Central is a much different task than contending for a World Series title. I know that is stating the obvious, but it does frame the. discussion somewhat and better describes what path the Twins might be pursuing.
  21. i would say to date the BP and Josh Bell additions constitute a quarter measure not a half. But there is still a few months of offseason remaining.
  22. This proposal while creative isn't money well spent. If the Twins actually would take on Walker's salary it seems they could spend that $20M a year in free agency to much better short and long term use than acquiring a 35 year old 1B.
  23. I don''t dispute your excellent analysis based on these numbers why would the Twins or any other team pay Arraez $10 M+? Surely all MLB teams have access to this level of analysis and much more. It seems though that there will be a market for Arraez because bottom line - this guy can hit.
  24. Since we all know. that the Twins shop in the bargain bin this is a decent signing. Three positives: 1. Bell is a 1B by experience and an ok MLB batter. Not someone morphed into the position. 2. The Twins don't have an obvious 1B in the system so Bell really isn't blocking anyone. 3. Huh - ok I meant two positives.
×
×
  • Create New...