This has come up several times from several posters, and IMO misses the point. I don't think anyone is saying Polanco is better than Dozier at the moment, and it's fair to question even whether his ceiling is as high as Dozier is at now or will remain for a few more seasons. The right question to me is Dozier versus Polanco + whatever we get in return for Dozier If trading Dozier (plus whatever prospects I would have to package alongside) were to net us a major league ready pitcher, we would survive whatever dropoff at 2B resulted. Ditto for a real upgrade at catcher, assuming my scouts aren't sticking to their guns about Murphy profiling as better than a backup at this point. I realize a stud starting pitcher doesn't grow on trees, and isn't willingly parted with by any team. Good trades are hard to put together - anyone can slap together two pitching prospects and get someone's bullpen piece. It's what I would focus on, anyway, and I would look at Dozier as the centerpiece for a team in need, plus any and all prospects outside of my top several in order to pry loose what I want. We have quantity in the farm system, we need to upgrade to quality with two or three key trades. Now I'm repeating myself. Here's a non-repeat: it comes down to trusting your own scouting and your own talent evaluation; if that trust isn't justified then you are engaging in Brownian motion, and in the long haul will come out behind. This is supposed to be Terry Ryan's strength as the old scouting director. I challenge Terry to close his career with a bang, by making some trades his successor will value.