I understood the reasoning too, in the sense that it was expressed in complete sentences with subjects and predicates. I did not understand how they could fail to take into account how much more valuable a good starting pitcher can be than a bullpen arm, if you develop one. I also did not understand how they could take seriously the idea they were in a pennant chase. Yes, embrace a bluebird season when one comes along; acquire a relief pitcher like Jepsen, for PR purposes, sure. (Although paying with any kind of starting prospect exceeded my own threshold of PR value.) But keep a clear-eyed, not-for-publication view of the actual state of your rebuild, and don't jeopardize an actual piece of your future who is already acclimating to his important role in the rotation. This didn't look clear-eyed, and more like they were caught up in the hype too. I understood, but I didn't.