That's been the formula since probably the days of Babe Ruth, if not earlier. You would always prefer the latter over the former, taken literally. I assume you mean, though, that you'd give up some of the speed and defense, in return for power, and I agree, and the amount that teams would give up is probably greater than in recent memory. (Or, they'd give up more resources, than ever before, to get that complete package.) I'm assuming also that Ben's arm hasn't exactly gotten better, with age. That factors in just a bit too. His defense is just a smidgen less than his range would otherwise suggest. Hm, he's 30 - how's his range?