These are all fair observations. But this is not the first time strategies have evolved. Note also that the 3-true outcomes are not a "new" game, those elements date back to just about the earliest incarnations of our game. What's new is that other elements have withered. As for evolution... way back when, infielders figured out that if you could intentionally drop a pop fly with men on base, you could score a cheap double play - voila, the Infield Fly Rule was invented to compensate, and it was so successful that few players can accurately state the rule anymore - infielders simply know not to bother with drop-the-ball shenanigans. Another example, at some point late in the 1890s, the running game was being stifled, and the balk rule was added to liven things up. One more: offenses went into the doldrums in the 1960s, and the pitching mound was lowered. We can modify rules, equipment, or ground rules, to take care of today's perceived ills too. Lowering the mound again (reducing strikeouts), deadening the ball 5% (reducing cheap HR), expanding the strike zone just a smidgen (reducing walks), together in careful combination or with additional ideas could reduce the dreaded Three True Outcomes and restore balance.