It's certainly helped by the fact it's as easy to buy a gun as a vending machine soda. If I can make someone have to do the extra work to find a way to kill a bunch of people as opposed to making it simple for them, I'm all for it. Maybe someone notices a person doing an awful lot of legwork on ways to kill 6 year olds, maybe they don't , but I'd rather give myself that opportunity than to just hand the gun over the counter to them. If saying banning guns is a lazy argument against gun deaths, then so is the, "they'll just find something else anyway" one. That's just an excuse to maintain the status quo and have it your way. Many issues contribute to why the people who do these things do them, I honestly don't think you need to tell most of the people on this board that, they get it. But while we idealistically try to work on curing humanity I think trying to do something in the interim that at least might help to reduce or avoid these tragedies is probably a good idea. If the social cost of that is you can't own a rocket launcher or that you risk facing the oppressive tyranny of the government, then I think in the grand scheme of things it's probably one most people are willing to live with. At least when the alternative is just a whole lot of talk. I realise I live in Canada, and I probably have a pretty good idea of what your opinion on that is, regardless, we too have socio-economic issues, growing disparities in wealth, challenges in the areas of mental health care, not to mention a 3rd world level issue of poverty with our indigenous people. What we also have are fairly stringent gun laws, and while we admittedly still experience our fair share of gun related deaths, I believe they play a role in preventing more of them from occurring. Which in my opinion allows us to focus more on the real reasons that cause them, instead of endlessly arguing about why owning an assault rifle is fair or not.