Try coming at this from another perspective - should any statue of Calvin Griffith have gone up in the first place? Consider: Keeping in mind that every soul can have at least a few redemptive moments (as Carew witnessed), on the whole Calvin appears to have been a pretty miserable human being, certainly not a role model for the youth that followed the ball club he ownedGriffith's faux pas were not limited to a single 1978 engagement in Waseca; a scan of press clippings over the long years of his career will yield numerous quotes that reflect poorly on his characterBy the time the '80s rolled around, poor management of both his public persona as well the ball club had eroded community goodwill toward Griffith; "Sell, Calvin, sell!" was the frequent mantra of the day (does anybody remember the ticket buyout campaign?) When his life accomplishments are totaled, did Calvin Griffith contribute enough to the sport, the state and his contemporaries to merit the esteem that comes with a bronze memorial in a prominent place? Probably not (YMMV). He certainly made Carl Pohlad look like a savior for many years after the '84 sale. We probably ought to have a talk about whether Carl really deserves a life-size hunk of metal, as well. There is no symbolism here, no history being lost - this is a right-sizing of how we memorialize a man whose shortcomings made him smaller than he could have been. More importantly, it should be a clear message to all of us that everyone is welcome at the ball park.