Ok I have a question. I do not and have not lived in any MLB team market for a long time, so forgive me for not understanding. Does this mean if you live in market, you have no options to watch the Twins? None so ever?
I can efinitely agree with similar profile...thanks for sharing that. Let's hope he continues on that trajectory..would be awsome for us. I also understand I am higher on Rodriguez than most. Yes he could flame out, but from the information I've gathered he is more likely to be a multiple time Allstars type. I trust the process on this one.
Doc...one is a concensus top 50 prospect. The other is on one list closer to number 100 than number 1. I have had many opportunities to watch him play in person...over 125 games including multiple practices. You may have your opinion. But stop trying to convince me your opinion is right. I will hold my opinion and just state facts. There is a large value gap between valuing a prospect at number 50 and number 89 or wereever he iby only one outlet. As opposed to a concensus top 50 player. And I believe this trade shows that. There is noway a Polanco trade would bring back a Rodriguez plus type package.
I was responding to a different blogger who was viewing Gonzales and Emma as equals. I couldn't disagree more. But you as well as the other poster are entitled to your opinios.
Comparing Gonzales to Emma? Really not comparibke at all even in the rankings. Emma is a concensus top 50 prospect with a higher cieking...So dont co that please..Gonzales is at a best a low 100 type. Doing Rodriguez a huge disservice there Doc.
Yes! Got invited into the cages in spring training last year. I was amazed. I wish my golf simulater gave me the data and charts they were getting threw this tech. Very cool.
Agree with this 💯. I could barely even notice the challenge system while in attendance at minor league games. It was very quick and effective. I'd prefer it over our current situation.
Ok so I have to ask DG. Do you think Jeffers is a good catcher or not? Here you have him being traded for a no 1 SP plus a younger version of Jeffers. On other threads you believe Jeffers should have been gone and we should be trotting out Garver and Rortvedt as our catchers. Sorry just confused on your takes.
Ok well just trust me..Jeffers is and was and will be more valuable than your Garver and Ben R. Yankees didnt wreck Rorvedt...he just wasn't good. Garver never was a strong D catcher. Still don't see how we bet the farm?
I'd not consider Garver or Rortvedt #1 catchers in my opinion. Ones a DH..ones a oft injured backup at best. Jeffers is and was the best of those 3...as always just my opinion.
This all sounds great. I think what separates it, is it's created and done by us. The TD community. I know there is some great stories, information, and insight out there in our community.