Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. I don't really do predictions, especially when so many variables are in play. I expect this team to lose around 90. Maybe less if they only trade expiring contracts, almost certainly more if they trade expiring contracts and non-expiring contracts like Berríos, Buxton, and/or Donaldson.
  2. Depending what kind of offers I'm fielding for Berríos, I may not even look ahead to 2022... though I'd probably make an attempt to be moderately competitive next year no matter who I trade. It's going to be really hard to be competitive without Berríos but I'm not sure I'd be able to resist two top 100 prospects for 1.5 years of the guy, only one year of which might be even a little bit useful to this team.
  3. Where are you looking? I see a 0.1 fWAR and a 0.8 rWAR. (but yes, he has been disappointing)
  4. Now I really want a catcher in round ten just to complete this series of posts.
  5. If that's true, we should be excited to see whats-his-face join the Twins sometime around the 2037-38 seasons.
  6. It has been fascinating to me how quickly Pittsburgh elevated to "pitching gurus" and plunged to "hot mess" over the course of 3-4 years, tops.
  7. Yeah, I was looking into that just a little while ago. Those 70s Twins teams really had "mediocrity" nailed down. They rarely finished outside the 3/4 slots in their 6-7 team divisions.
  8. Not that it really changes your overall point, as the Twins were mostly mediocre/bad in the 70s too, but the powder blues originated in the early 70s.
  9. Yeah, he'd have to OPS .400 for a month before I'd even *consider* sending him back to St Paul.
  10. Well... that's.... optimistic. I'd lop off about ten wins off that season total. I think they'll play relatively close to .500 but they're going to lose too many good players this month to make any kind of push.
  11. Yikes. BP's predictive modeling only becomes more broken as the season progresses.
  12. Have there been any reports on who the Twins might be targeting at 61?
  13. I've rarely felt strongly about specific draft picks in any sport, even less so about baseball. Too much that we as fans just don't know about these kids to have a real opinion about them.

  14. The last thing I EVER want is for my favorite team's draft coordinators to draft as if their job is immediately on the line. Woof, that would lead to some truly terrible outcomes given how the MLB draft works and the timeline it operates on.
  15. Failures of past front offices should have little to no bearing on the actions of the current front office.
  16. I understand the desire to see Gordon play more but we aren't within a country mile of "ridiculous", in my opinion. The trade deadline is in less than three weeks and the Twins are pretty obviously showcasing pretty much their entire roster for possible trade candidates. In the here and now, that is the right decision. Nick Gordon should not be playing over the likes of Arraez, Kirilloff, Larnach, et al for obvious reasons. They're all better players and building blocks to the next good Twins team. Gordon also shouldn't be playing over the likes of Sano, Cruz, Simmons, Donaldson, et al because if the Twins can trade those guys in the next three weeks, they will eagerly do so. Teams don't maximize trade value of a player by not playing them in the lead-up to the deadline. Be patient. There is a full two months of baseball after the deadline. If Gordon isn't receiving significant playing time in those two months, I'll likely be standing right next to you in the "ridiculous" camp of arguments.
  17. I’m updating the original post with all the latest draft articles as they’re posted, btw.
  18. Exactly. There are two full months to fill a lineup with question marks after the deadline. Right now, it’s about showcasing trade pieces.
  19. Getting eight out without giving up four runs is a tall order for this bullpen.
  20. 30 MLB teams can use a catcher that hits like Garver but right now it’s unclear when he will resume catching.
  21. There’s the Robbie Grossman we know and love.
  22. The balk rule is perhaps the dumbest rule in a sport chock full of dumbass rules. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.
  23. See, I think Garver can bring a haul by himself if the front office times it right, which probably means this off-season or next July.
  24. If someone is willing to pay big for Garver right now, trading him is fine. I’m just skeptical anyone will pay a premium right now after the up and down of the past 1.5 seasons.
  25. Oh, I don’t necessarily want to see Garver traded, I just don’t want to see Rortvedt play.
×
×
  • Create New...