Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Made a Mistake Waiting on Byron Buxton’s Hip Surgery

    Every week matters when a player is facing a six- to eight-month recovery, and the Twins may have cost themselves valuable time with their Buxton decision.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Byron Buxton's 2026 season ended with another injury. Buxton's incapacitation derailed the team's push toward the postseason, but the bigger concern for the Minnesota Twins might be what happens next. Buxton underwent arthroscopic surgery on his right hip last week, with the Twins announcing that the procedure included a labral repair, decompression and cam resection. Some of that is just to relieve the hip impingement he dealt with all year, but the labral repair is more involved—and more ominous.

    Nobody should pretend to be a doctor when discussing a complicated hip surgery. However, previous MLB cases involving labral repairs suggest a recovery that can take roughly 6-8 months. That timeline raises a question: Why did the Twins wait as long as they did to make this decision?

    Buxton's last game came on August 25 in Sacramento. His surgery didn't take place until September 18. That's nearly four weeks between Buxton's final game and the procedure. The Twins quasi-officially shut Buxton down for the season on September 11, but another week passed before the surgery actually happened. By that point, Minnesota's postseason chances had dwindled to virtually nothing, anyway.

    Even after he limped off the field against the A's, there was some hope that Buxton could return late in the season, but that increasingly looked like a long shot. Once that became clear, the argument for continuing to wait became much more difficult to understand. This is where the timeline becomes particularly important. Six months after Buxton's September 18 surgery lands on March 18. That's only one week before Opening Day. An eight-month recovery pushes his potential return to May 18, which would be 47 games into the 2027 season.

    Obviously, recovery timelines aren't guaranteed. Buxton could progress faster. He could also require more time. The latter seems more likely, given Buxton’s extensive injury history. There are too many variables involved to declare a specific return date this far in advance. But that's exactly why those extra weeks mattered.

    If the Twins had determined earlier that surgery was necessary, they could have started the recovery process sooner. Instead, they waited until late September to perform a procedure that could keep their best player out for a significant portion of the following season.

    The most frustrating part is that the Twins had already been dealing with the hip issue for months. Buxton and manager Derek Shelton both expressed confidence before the surgery that Buxton would be ready for next season. The exact wording varied, particularly when it came to whether that meant being ready for spring training or Opening Day. That optimism now feels more like a pipe dream. If he'd had surgery three weeks sooner, the chances of being ready on time would certainly be better.

    There is also a significant difference between saying a player will be "ready for next season" and having him physically prepared to play 162 games. That’s something few players accomplish in modern baseball, and Buxton has averaged 107 games per year over the last three seasons—the three healthiest campaigns he's had in the last decade. Even if Buxton avoids a major setback, a player returning from this type of surgery could need additional time to build strength and regain his normal workload.

    The Twins have spent years trying to get the most out of Buxton while managing his injury history. Minnesota paid Buxton roughly $70 million through the first five seasons of the contract. FanGraphs estimates that he has provided approximately $122.5 million in value over that span. Even when he misses time, he provides remarkable value.

    That makes the decision to sacrifice four weeks of recovery time even more difficult to understand. Maybe the surgery ultimately doesn't cost Buxton any games in 2027. Maybe his rehab goes perfectly and he's ready for Opening Day. But the Twins didn't need to gamble on that outcome. They had an opportunity to give Buxton more time to recover, and they didn't take it.

    A Mistake that Could Linger into 2027

    The Twins' decision to wait on Buxton's surgery is one of those choices that might not be fully judged until next season. If Buxton is healthy for Opening Day and plays a full season, the timing becomes a footnote. If he's forced to miss the beginning of the season because the recovery takes closer to eight months, those September weeks will look much more significant.

    Minnesota already has plenty of questions to answer heading into the offseason. Payroll needs to be addressed, the roster needs more direction, and the organization needs to determine what kind of team it wants to build around its remaining core.

    The last thing the Twins needed was to unnecessarily complicate their plans for their most important player. There was a point when waiting made sense, because Buxton was still trying to return. But once it became apparent that his season was effectively over, the clock should have started immediately. Instead, the Twins waited. Now, they have to hope those lost weeks don't come back to haunt them in April and May. Considering the usual recovery timeline for Buxton's surgery, that is a gamble the Twins probably didn't need to take.


    Was it a mistake for the Twins to wait on Buxton’s surgery? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    3 hours ago, LyleCole said:

    The Twins made a huge mistake in not trading Buxton in the offseason.  He was coming off one of his best seasons of his career and the 2nd most games played in a season.  He still was a valuable 5 tool player and for a contending team on a very favorable contract that at the start of 2026 had three full years of team control.

    The entire no-trade saga could have been easily overridden by trading him to a contending team that really wanted him.

    And how was this going to happen?

    8 hours ago, djvang said:

    Unfortunately he's just cursed with a body that constantly breaks down under routine baseball wear-and tear. 

    What are his stats when he's on the IL, where's he's been as often as on the field?

    The Dodgers collect oft injured players and manage to win 

    What’s the worry here? If Buxton isn’t ready at the start of the season, you’ve got Jenkins or Rodriguez to play CF until he’s proven ready to go. Twins weren’t supposed to be contenders next year anyway, right? Next year is waiting for Houston and Lackey to be promoted and have the dream team getting ready for championship in 2028 and beyond. Fans get to see all the prized prospects play everyday. When Buck comes back, they can assess what the plan is for him that is best for the team and the player. 

    16 hours ago, PuckettPond said:

    Buxton will also need a hip replacement. He will never be the same as it is doubtful he plays in 2027. He is doing more harm than good to the Twins. Please retire for the sake of everyone as he will only embarrass himself.

     

    latest-3266503930.webp

    16 hours ago, HarmonK03 said:

    And how was this going to happen?

    You make a trade with a contending team and Buxton would have agreed to it.  100% guaranteed.  Like I explained, it is one thing to state "I want to be a Twin forever". It is another to really be confronted with reality of playing for a team that is going to contend for the World Series and will make you a true star player, rather than an unknown toiling for a team  in the minor league of major league baseball.  I get why Buxton would say he does not want to be traded, but in the end he would have moved.  Competitiveness, financial opportunities, and career opportunities.  Only a fool would stay with the Minnesota Twins when they have the opportunity to move to the Dodgers, Braves, Yankees, Cubs, Red Sox, or Phillies.

    At the beginning of 2026 Buxton could have brought a haul of players to the Twins, including at least one top level pitching prospect.  Given the state of our pitching pipeline that would have been a major benefit to rebuild this team into a real contender.  Joe Ryan could have returned the same value.  

     

    6 minutes ago, LyleCole said:

    You make a trade with a contending team and Buxton would have agreed to it.  100% guaranteed.  Like I explained, it is one thing to state "I want to be a Twin forever". It is another to really be confronted with reality of playing for a team that is going to contend for the World Series and will make you a true star player, rather than an unknown toiling for a team  in the minor league of major league baseball.  I get why Buxton would say he does not want to be traded, but in the end he would have moved.  Competitiveness, financial opportunities, and career opportunities.  Only a fool would stay with the Minnesota Twins when they have the opportunity to move to the Dodgers, Braves, Yankees, Cubs, Red Sox, or Phillies.

    At the beginning of 2026 Buxton could have brought a haul of players to the Twins, including at least one top level pitching prospect.  Given the state of our pitching pipeline that would have been a major benefit to rebuild this team into a real contender.  Joe Ryan could have returned the same value.  

     

    I do not understand how you can 100% guarantee this, there is only one person who knows this and that is Buxton.  I don't believe he is dumb or naive and hasn't thought through everything you are saying and yet he has chosen to stay here and has made that public information.  He is here through 2028 so we might as well get used to that.

    If anything changes I don't believe it will be public until an actual transaction occurs.

    6 hours ago, HarmonK03 said:

    I do not understand how you can 100% guarantee this, there is only one person who knows this and that is Buxton.  I don't believe he is dumb or naive and hasn't thought through everything you are saying and yet he has chosen to stay here and has made that public information.  He is here through 2028 so we might as well get used to that.

    If anything changes I don't believe it will be public until an actual transaction occurs.

    The percentage of players rejecting upward trades is about 0% in the entire history of the league.

    Now, if we were trading him to a non-contender I would think otherwise.

    The fact is that the best thing for Byron Buxton's career would be traded from a low level team like the Twins to a power team.  

    3 minutes ago, LyleCole said:

    The percentage of players rejecting upward trades is about 0% in the entire history of the league.

    Now, if we were trading him to a non-contender I would think otherwise.

    The fact is that the best thing for Byron Buxton's career would be traded from a low level team like the Twins to a power team.  

    💯

    3 hours ago, LyleCole said:

    The percentage of players rejecting upward trades is about 0% in the entire history of the league.

    Now, if we were trading him to a non-contender I would think otherwise.

    The fact is that the best thing for Byron Buxton's career would be traded from a low level team like the Twins to a power team.  

    It sounds like deGrom disproved this theory when he turned down a trade to Atlanta this year which would have been an upward trade.  And I would guess that there have been others, it just was never reported.

    To me it doesn't seem like a good idea to speak for others, even it is something you would do, it doesn't mean others would do the same.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...