Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Money Might be the Real Reason the Front Office did Nothing at the Deadline


    Hans Birkeland

    The front office had conversations and could have made moves. Their explanations for not doing so don't hold water, so the only explanation I can think of is that ownership didn't approve adding payroll, just like the 2022 White Sox.

    Image courtesy of David Berding-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    In my never-ending quest to grapple with unfavorable realities by saying what things are similar to other things, I took a look at the 2022 White Sox to try and figure out why this Twins team did nothing at the trade deadline and then gave us an excuse on par with a sixth grader who forgot their math homework. The White Sox were last year's Twins - they had more talent than the rest of the division, but couldn't get out of their own way, had some injuries, and generally just hovered around .500. Every winning streak became a losing streak. Every breakout performance turned into an injury. The opposition crushed every 3-2 pitch with a game on the line.

    And when the deadline came around, the White Sox did nothing. It was inexplicable. They made one trade, sending their backup catcher, Reese McGuire, for struggling lefty reliever Jake Diekman. GM Rick Hahn had the following to say:

    "We're disappointed that we weren't able to do more to improve this club, I think you saw a year ago at this time, you've seen it for the last several years, arguably the last couple of decades, that it's our nature to try to improve this club at any opportunity we have. Unfortunately, we weren't able to line up on some of our other potential targets."

    That is probably a bit more direct than Derek Falvey's explanation for the Twins' inaction, and White Sox fans crucified Hahn's. They had five quality starters (sound familiar?), but they had a true ace in Dylan Cease, who finished runner-up for the Cy Young. They had lineup stars in Tim AndersonEloy Jimenez, Luis Robert Jr. Andrew VaughnJose AbreuYasmani GrandalYoan Moncada, and a great (though expensive) bullpen. It made even less sense for that team to be .500 then for the current Twins to be .500. They needed any playable outfielder and a bullpen piece at the deadline. 

    Sound familiar?

    When the season concluded, it came to light that the White Sox were operating with a cap on their spending, and that was at least part of the reason for their inaction. Even with the additions of Andrew Benintendi and Mike Clevinger, they opened the 2023 season with a payroll of about $13 million less than what they ended 2022 with. Could this be a reason the Twins stood pat, as well?

    In Chicago's case, they had a thin farm system and probably assumed that the Twins and Guardians would return to earth in the second half, so they could avoid adding any payroll (They were right about the Twins, at least).

    The Twins are in a similar spot. Their farm system is weak but has a few impact guys floating around in Brooks LeeMarco Raya, and Emmanuel Rodriguez. They could have cashed those guys in and gone for it, knowing they were likely to host a playoff series, but could the team have afforded/gotten ownership approval for adding on Paul Goldschmidt's salary? Juan Soto's? Even the $5 million owed to Teoscar Hernandez over the rest of the year?

    We have no indications that they either could or could not, so what follows is theory, not fact. What we do have are half-baked explanations that they didn't want to remove anyone off the 26-man roster of a team with a .500 record and had a couple of sellers turn into buyers last minute. One way to divert attention from being at your spending limit is to say you don't want to give up your prospects, but they certainly had no problem offering up Cade Povich and Christian Encarnacion-Strand last year and didn't even offer that excuse this time around.

    Moderately tuned-in Twins fans have tried for years to quell the masses claiming "cheap Pohlads" and "poverty franchise" at every missed free agent. While all that was true in 1999, we tried to explain that the payrolls have risen to be mid-pack. We signed Carlos Correa! We extended Pablo Lopez! There's plenty of blame to go toward the front office, but their mistakes don't have anything to do with money! It was annoying work, but someone had to do it. The team is now running into some real financial limitations, some of which are out of their control, but nonetheless could have steered the front office away from adding anyone with anything above a minimum salary the rest of the way.

    First, the Diamond Sports situation could greatly impact payroll flexibility. While they agreed to pay the Twins for their 2023 contract, the team is a free agent at the end of the year. And it seems increasingly unlikely that whatever media partnership they enter into for 2024 will not be nearly as lucrative as the one they had with Bally (court documents revealed that the deal was worth $54.8 million per year)- there's a reason it was hemorrhaging money beyond just mismanagement. With streaming and general shifts in the media landscape, TV deals just don't hit like they used to ten or even five years ago. If $20 million or so gets knocked off the team's revenues for 2024, that will impact the team's payroll, one way or the other. Not to mention the team is already running a franchise record $153 million payroll after signing Correa to the biggest deal in team history.

    Second, ticket sales have not been great. They are up over 2022 at roughly 24,000 per game, but that pales compared to 2019 (28,000/game) and 2013 (30,000/game). Twins president Dave St. Peter famously stated last August that he didn't understand why fans weren't coming to games, citing the likable, contending (at the time) team. Not noted by St. Peter was any awareness of the public perception of the team, which had yet to collapse at that point.

    My theory is that Falvey and Levine were directed not to add to the payroll for this year. That may have to do with the team's lackluster performance, or it might have to do with a lack of future revenue. Either way, it would seem ownership told the front office to make something up about believing in their guys and not wanting to boot anyone off the roster.

    I've supported most of what this front office has done, or at least could see the thinking behind their weirder decisions. But if the team is fabricating excuses for not having authorization to add a couple million to its payroll, that's dysfunctional. Adding Connor Joe and Michael Fulmer wouldn't have made this team that much more of an attraction. But don't tell me you couldn't address obvious weaknesses that wouldn't cost much in prospect capital because the market didn't shape up exactly how you anticipated or didn't want to hurt Joey Gallo's feelings. If you weren't authorized to add payroll, say that. We get that; we're Twins fans.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    Friday night, Marek Houston's first homer came in a 6-run 7th inning. His second home run gave his team an 8-2 lead an inning later. He's 3-for-5, 2 HR (5) and a stolen base, his 15th.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    I know what the article was about...a possible, and quite plausible IMO, reason for no deadline additions.

    What data would there be supporting or refuting this speculation? Would you expect to see Falvey say "Yeah, we're tapped out. No more dinero."?

    Because as we both believe, there's holes in the roster. So why zero attempt to fix any of them? 

     

     

    I guess I could just say they hate the fans. And don't care about winning. If you make a claim, you need data, or something.

    Why is money more plausible than they didn't think the team was that great and wasn't worth investing prospect capital on?

    10 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I see no evidence of this supplied anywhere online. The easiest explanation is they didn't love the team, and didn't want to pay the cost of prospects. They seem to believe that Lewis will be back at third, and polanco can cover it until he comes back. RP is hard to predict.

    All that's simple to believe is the truth. 

    Some 40 years of history would give one the idea that the Pohlads have a budget limit. It would be an aLmost hard cap. To add to the team enough to make it competitive with Houston would have taken getting the 2 best relievers on the market as well as 2 rh bats that can OPS+ above 120 against LH pitching then you would be counting on 5 SP that haven’t pitched that many innings in a long time to continue to pitch another 3-5 more games.  The increase in attendance following a run to the WS would pay for the payroll. The probability of that kind of run is small

     

     

     

     

    Baseball is a strange business to be in. Not for the faint of heart. You're running a multimillion dollar corporation whose customers are over the top passionate about the product. Your assets are squishy, in that April valuation is nearly guaranteed to be different in September. And that is just the baseball side. Throw in a media contract that is 20% of your revenue and a complete unknown for 2024. Yes, money is a factor in all your decisions.

    If the goal is to reach the playoffs and every other team in your division, including Cleveland, which had the best chance of catching you, is selling (or in the Guards' case, self-immolating), why join that party?  You're at a record-high payroll, fan interest is flat, your farm system is beginning to thrive again and your chances of making the playoffs (or achieving more success in this year's playoffs) aren't going to increase very much by acquiring this year's throwaways for your high-value prospects.  The FO really got burned playing this game last year and we've all had field days criticizing them for their lack of acumen.  Why not wait for a buyers' market?  

    Somebody had to say "stop the madness."  Falvey has overpaid for everything and pretty much been a lap dog to Scott Boras.  Anybody can do that.  Don't know what I'm doing?  Hey, I'll just overpay for a Boras client.

    Anyway, I was thinking recently that the Pohlads have to put up a stop sign to this, and that would mean Falvey might have trouble doing anything, since he's already ruined the farm system.

    22 hours ago, Minderbinder said:

    I likely would've said the same thing about Tyler Wells, Yennier Cano and Spencer Steer.  But, not now....

    Spencer Steer was a much higher rated prospect than they would have needed to trade away for the role players needed.

    Tyler Wells was lost in the Rule 5 draft, which is an argument to MAKE a trade so you don't lose a talented player for literally nothing.

    Yannier Cano is one of the most shocking improvements in MLB in 2023. Maybe the most surprise improvement I recall ever seeing. He's essentially hitting his 99th percentile outcome. If you don't trade that kind of minor league player away then you are in favor of never, ever making a trade.

    On 8/6/2023 at 10:22 AM, Minny505 said:

    Spencer Steer was a much higher rated prospect than they would have needed to trade away for the role players needed.

    Tyler Wells was lost in the Rule 5 draft, which is an argument to MAKE a trade so you don't lose a talented player for literally nothing.

    Yannier Cano is one of the most shocking improvements in MLB in 2023. Maybe the most surprise improvement I recall ever seeing. He's essentially hitting his 99th percentile outcome. If you don't trade that kind of minor league player away then you are in favor of never, ever making a trade.

    All of them --- Steer, Wells, and Cano --- were not evaluated correctly.  That is an argument for thinking twice or thrice before making a trade.  Any trade.  This FO didn't know what it had then and therefore it should be conservative before trading away what it thinks it has now, especially in a seller's market.  That says I'm in favor of rethinking the risk/reward before making a trade.  And please don't put words in my mouth.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...