Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Minnesota Twins Arbitration Dilemma: Three Fringe Relievers


    Matthew Lenz

    The Twins have arbitration decisions to make on three should-have-been key relievers who combined for just 34 ⅓ innings for them in 2024. Should the organization tender contracts to any of these three or let them walk to free agency?

    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images (left), Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images (top right), Matt Blewett-Imagn Images (bottom right)

    Twins Video

    MLB Trade Rumors projects Brock Stewart, Michael Tonkin, and Justin Topa to get $800,000, $1.5 million, and $1.3 million, respectively, via arbitration this winter. Stewart and Topa were limited in 2024 due to injuries, but each has a track record of being reliable relievers when they've been healthy. On the other hand, Tonkin provided a full season of work with the New York Mets and New York Yankees before finishing with the Twins. Each of the relievers took a different route to the Twins, as Topa was part of the return from the Jorge Polanco trade; Stewart signed as a free agent in the middle of the 2022 season; and Tonkin was poached off waivers from the Yankees. At relatively cheap costs, should the Twins tender any or all of these relievers? Let's look into both sides of the arguments.

    Why They Should Be Tendered
    At just $800,000, you can't find a cheaper player than what Stewart is projected to receive. While he wasn't productive in 15 ⅔ big-league innings in 2024, we have a larger (and healthier) body of work from 2023 that suggests he can still be a very good right-handed reliever. In 43 ⅓ innings, Stewart has pitched to a 2.28 ERA supported by a 2.78 FIP, with a 22.7 K-BB% and 86.3% strand rate, which is good for fifth in baseball among pitchers who have thrown 40 or more innings.

    There's nothing we can garner from Topa’s 2024 season, but if you wanted to try: he performed well in 2 ⅓ innings over three appearances at the end of the season. Topa was one of two major-league pieces acquired in the Jorge Polanco trade, and with the Mariners in 2023, he posted a 2.61 ERA, 3.15 FIP and 15.4 K-BB%. His low-90s sinker, which is his primary offering, was a plus pitch for him with a run value of 10 and sets up his sweeper. Entering the offseason fully healthy from a non-arm injury, I wouldn’t be surprised if he can bounce back to his 2023 self.

    Old friend Tonkin re-joined the Twins at the end of August, and quickly became one of their most reliable arms. While his 2024 stats aren’t anything to write home about, two straight seasons of roughly 80 quality innings are nothing to be scoffed at, either. His two primary offerings, a mid-90s four-seam fastball and sharp slider, induced a combined .215 and .321 opponent batting average and slugging percentage, respectively, and he generated a 78th-percentile chase rate between all his pitches.

    From a roster construction standpoint, the Twins need relievers, and each of these present cheap options to bridge the gap between the starters and the back end of the bullpen. They are each fly-ball pitchers which is something to consider, at least in the short term, given the number of question marks surrounding the defensive viability at each of the infield positions.

    Why They Shouldn’t Be Tendered
    Before getting into each reliever individually, be reminded that relievers are a very volatile group and it’s always hard to predict when, or how fast, the fall in production comes. Moreover, each of these relievers are entering their age-33 or older season, making the likelihood of regression even higher. And lastly, each of these relievers are right-handed, with traditional splits. Those alone are arguments as to why none of these fringe relievers should be tendered, before we even address their warts.

    Alright, with that out of the way…let’s look at each of these pitchers individually.

    Stewart is returning from arthroscopic shoulder surgery, meaning there is a very real chance that we’ve seen the last of a serviceable Stewart. In a small sample of work, he also allowed a lot of hard contact in the air with a .407 opponent slugging percentage.

    I’m less concerned about Topa’s injury, given that it’s to his lower body, but it can’t totally be ignored—especially considering he basically just missed all of 2024. For what it’s worth, Edwin Díaz returned from a patellar tendon injury this year and experienced a slight dip in performance from 2022. While these players are in completely different echelons, Topa can’t afford much of a decline in performance given his age and arbitration price point.

    Tonkin is the most expensive arm of this group and, similar to Stewart, he allowed a lot of hard contact in the air to the pull side. While most of his surface-level and peripheral stats suggest the last two seasons weren’t a fluke, ZiPS projection models don’t see him as a serviceable reliever in 2025 and beyond.

    What I Would Do
    I don’t think the Twins should keep all three relievers, given that they need to add another left-handed reliever to go alongside Kody Funderburk. And I don’t think any of these relievers are clear choices above the rest, so I am going to go with the two cheapest options, who also provide the most upside. Brock Stewart, whose shoulder should be mostly (if not fully) recovered by the time Spring Training rolls around, was very good for the 2023 Twins. Tendering him for less than a million dollars is a pretty low-risk, high reward move.

    The same line of reasoning can be used for Topa, but I also want to see some (hopefully) positive return from the Polanco trade and I’d think the Derek Falvey would feel the same way. That leaves Tonkin as the odd man out as I’d repurpose his $1.5 million for a lefty reliever.

    What do you think? Who, if anybody, from this group would you tender a contract to?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

    Let's say they're all 3 brought back: Duran, Jax, Stewart, Sands, Alcala, Varland, Topa, Tonkin from the RH side with Duarte, Henriquez, Winder, MAYBE Canterino for  additional depth, and Kyle Bischoff looks like he might help and what about someone like Blewitt coming back? Not to mention any other reclamation projects that are always brought in with MILB deals. 

    I feel pretty good about the RH side.

    Henriquez and Winder are out of options.

    1 hour ago, DocBauer said:

    Not sure why everyone is so down on Tonkin. Age? Memory bias of his time with the Twins when he first came up? He was very solid as a long/middle man with the Braves in 2023 when he came back to MLB. His overall 2024 numbers, split between 3 teams, were extremely close to his 2023 numbers, even better in a few instances. I'm less excited about bringing him back, but he's been a pretty reliable middle man the past couple of years, and those guys who can throw more than one inning at a time have value as well. If's not offered, he'll be snapped up in a moment by someone for exactly that role. 

    because he's turning 35 this month and has never really had a particularly standout season his whole career? He was pretty good this year, He was decent in 2015 in limited innings. But his career ERA+ is 101, his career FIP is 4.24. he gets Ks, but also gives up hits & walks: his WHIP this year of 1.261 is right in line with his career WHIP of 1.296. he's just not all that dominant and hasn't shown a high ceiling. he's been fine? But not really much better than say, Staumont, who no one will really miss.

    he's not bad or anything, just hard to see him as being worth tendering. I'd rather see Varland in that spot.

    22 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

    because he's turning 35 this month and has never really had a particularly standout season his whole career? He was pretty good this year, He was decent in 2015 in limited innings. But his career ERA+ is 101, his career FIP is 4.24. he gets Ks, but also gives up hits & walks: his WHIP this year of 1.261 is right in line with his career WHIP of 1.296. he's just not all that dominant and hasn't shown a high ceiling. he's been fine? But not really much better than say, Staumont, who no one will really miss.

    he's not bad or anything, just hard to see him as being worth tendering. I'd rather see Varland in that spot.

    Oh, I think Varland is a shoe-in for the pen. I have a strong belief in his future there. And I don't think Tonkin is any sort of MUST for the season, but he was much better than Staumont wouldn't you say? And an inexpensive, solid inning guys in the pen doesn't sound bad, and it's something Rocco likes to have. 

    I'm completely fine going a different direction and saving an extra $1M by not keeping him. I just think he's gotr some value in that middle relief role as a veteran for less than $2M. 

    Brock Stewart has pitched in 34 games at the mlb level the last 2 years. That is 34 more games than he pitched in the 3 years prior to that, what makes people think it is going to be different? Topa had one overworked year after years of injuries and ends up injured. Funny how that woks. Yet with all the access to analytics this front office doesn’t seem to track it. The last several years seems like the Twins have been near the top in days on the d.l. When the frugal franchises do not consider days lost on the dl that should be a flag. It is not a checkered one.

    Tonkin would be the durable low leverage guy, he can eat a couple innings and not miss a week recovering. He had a minimal contract last year. 1 million per b ref.  He was never out of work,, bur was well traveled. I do not know why anyone would think he should get that high of raise. Not that I begrudge him the money. One should respect the work and persistence of Tonkin to make it back to mlb baseball and thrive. 

    On 11/9/2024 at 6:05 AM, old nurse said:

    Brock Stewart has pitched in 34 games at the mlb level the last 2 years. That is 34 more games than he pitched in the 3 years prior to that, what makes people think it is going to be different? Topa had one overworked year after years of injuries and ends up injured. Funny how that woks. Yet with all the access to analytics this front office doesn’t seem to track it. The last several years seems like the Twins have been near the top in days on the d.l. When the frugal franchises do not consider days lost on the dl that should be a flag. It is not a checkered one.

    Tonkin would be the durable low leverage guy, he can eat a couple innings and not miss a week recovering. He had a minimal contract last year. 1 million per b ref.  He was never out of work,, bur was well traveled. I do not know why anyone would think he should get that high of raise. Not that I begrudge him the money. One should respect the work and persistence of Tonkin to make it back to mlb baseball and thrive. 

    The projected contracts of all three guys are pretty minimal.  If healthy, Topa and Stewart are well worth the investment, even if they aren’t available for the entire schedule.

    Tonkin, OTOH, is quite replaceable, probably one of 20 guys who cycle through multiple teams, get DFA’d and claimed. I don’t think he’s worth rostering. 

    2 hours ago, stringer bell said:

    The projected contracts of all three guys are pretty minimal.  If healthy, Topa and Stewart are well worth the investment, even if they aren’t available for the entire schedule.

    Tonkin, OTOH, is quite replaceable, probably one of 20 guys who cycle through multiple teams, get DFA’d and claimed. I don’t think he’s worth rostering. 

    If healthy is a mighty big if.as their last few years would suggest the odds are against the being healthy part. The unexpected injuries are one thing, but a track record of it should not be part of the plan of a contendending team. 

    It did seem like the cycled through 20 guys last year. So far the only one they kept is Tonkin




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...