Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Is Emphasizing Depth Charges Like Ty France the Right Offseason Strategy?


    Cody Pirkl

    The Twins have made a series of moves in the last few weeks, but each has been an incremental improvement on existing depth. The front office remains more interested in setting the floor of the roster than pursuing upside. Is that the right choice?

    Image courtesy of © Katie Stratman-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Twins signed Ty France to a one-year big-league deal on Wednesday, and he’ll likely see quite a bit of time at first base to begin the season. France may have experience at first base, but he doesn't offer any more defensive competence, athleticism, or offensive upside than Jose Miranda, who was already on the roster. It’s another late-offseason addition by the front office, meant to fill out the roster's margins. Is this the process they should have used this winter?

    The Twins front office has repeatedly demonstrated a compulsion to set a floor at each key place on their roster in recent seasons. With a lineup of players bound to miss some time, fill-ins must be ready, should they be needed. Valuable players on the margins of the roster are a nice bonus. It’s a good process, in theory, but we’ve seen these types of moves make very little difference most years, and in 2024, they arguably did more harm than good.

    The Twins' class of 2024 floor joists was forgettable. Anthony DeSclefani, brought in to eat a few innings at the back end of the rotation, never threw a pitch. Manuel Margot, brought in to back up Byron Buxton in center field, had a nightmarish season while also playing semi-regularly, due to injuries. Kyle Farmer, whose option was picked up to back up Carlos Correa, wasn’t trusted at shortstop when he was needed and had a disastrous season at the plate. When it came time for the “floor players” to contribute to the team, they weren’t up to the task.

    This winter, the team lost everyday right fielder Max Kepler and first baseman Carlos Santana, who had sometimes helped carry the lineup. With a roster still consisting of several players who are likely to miss some time, the roster looks pretty scary when projecting what it may look like if they do.

    Players brought in to “raise the floor” of the roster typically come with a low floor (and low ceiling) themselves, which can be seen in all three Twins signings so far. Danny Coulombe is a 35-year-old soft-tossing lefty with the upside of becoming a secondary setup man. Harrison Bader’s upside is based almost solely on his defensive value, as it’s hard to plan on more than league-average offense at this point in his career. It’s been two years since Ty France has put up offensive stat lines that are acceptable for a primary first baseman. In small, well-crafted roles, these guys can be positive contributors, but the odds are that they will either be forced into larger, less well-crafted roles than expected or fall short of even their modest projected production.

    We don’t know the dynamics of the free-agent market, or even how the suddenly fluid payroll situation has evolved over the offseason. However, it’s still fair to wonder whether the money spent this winter could have been more effectively allocated elsewhere. Does this trio make the Twins a better team than, say, combining all of that money for Paul Goldschmidt and relying on internal options for backup outfield help and hoping to fall sideways into a left-handed reliever? Time is the only way to say for certain, but the Twins' current front office has shown us through the years that their ability to find impact in the lower tiers of free agency is extremely inconsistent.

    We should, at least, be happy with the Twins' surprising ability to make additions so far this winter. That being said, the bitter taste of 2024 is still fresh. With the payroll situation, it’s likely a waste to ask for more, but it would be hard to blame fans for asking for something different. Should the Twins have aimed for quality over quantity this offseason?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    And you can say you don't hate Bader all you want but when you and others are talking like this or lamenting the fact he can't be optioned, that's more telling. 

    Man up and tell the truth if you hate the player. I think Austin Martin sucks and I'm obviously not shy about it. 

    giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952krpxkqebv7iurt5k7r

    18 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I'm torn.  I don't like the archetypes we draft for offense, though I like that we target offense early.  I don't like that our young players always seem to be lesser defenders than I expect them to be given their athleticism and pedigree.  On the flip side - the pitching pipeline does seem to be up and running.

    But all teams have to patch holes in their roster that the farm system fails to produce.  I'm just fully on board with this patch.  That's where I think some of the disconnect is, even if we largely agree.

    I agree... I'm also torn. When Chief asked me why I'm not demanding a new front office... All I can say is I'm getting close. 

    Everybody I've ever known in life is good at some things and not so good at others things.  Baby Bathwater... that kinda thing. I think this front office has been a vast improvement over what Terry Ryan was doing. We are not signing innings eaters because the farm is starting to produce arms. That's huge and it will pay off in the long run. 

    Ultimately, I'm going to judge this front office on development and development alone. Development fills spaces... development provides trade value. development provides more money to sign bigger and better.

    What I see them doing with our young position players right now is strip mining them for parts. That just continues the cycle. 

    I guess...  Basically... I don't want to join the millions and millions of fans who are calling for their head coach to be fired. 

    Right now... I just want them to stop doing this specific thing. 

    2 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    France will likely not take many PAs from either. Maybe a few at DH.

    France is here to play 1B.

    And he's here to play 1B because this FO hasn't developed one. Despite going heavy for bats early in draft after draft. 

    And doesn't have one coming either.

    Agreed... They have focused on boppers in the draft... It's kinda curious with that focus... why over the past 6 Years since Mauer left. Our version of Power Hitting Bob hasn't shown up... or even on the horizon. 

    On 2/14/2025 at 11:26 PM, NYCTK said:

    And he's not hit lefties since 2019. 

    Was Buxton the 4th OF last season? That tells you how dumb I think this question is. And I'm obviously guessing. Maybe it's 350. Maybe Buxton is incredibly healthy and it's 220. Why get fixated on this? 

    Great. Let me know when OF no longer need to play the OF and then this is relevant. 

    We've been over this; he hasn't faced LHP since 2019.

    Nobody is the "4th OF," with the way this team platoons, and that's precisely the point you continue to dodge. 

    Why get fixated on how many PAs this team will commit to a terrible hitter? Yeesh.  

    On 2/14/2025 at 11:31 PM, NYCTK said:

    You people are so hyperfixated on half the game. Was Ozzie Smith a bad player in your eyes? 

    What a comp....

    On 2/15/2025 at 7:52 AM, TheLeviathan said:

    The utilization is a function of organizational philosophy.  His spot will get that usage, be it him or Austin Martin.  So the complaint is misplaced IMO.

    To me it's simple: Buxton is the starting CF.  As of two weeks ago plan B was Martin.  If (when) Buck gets hurt that plan is the kind that gets your entire season sunk.  It's the kind of contigency that doesn't require hindsight in August to see needed to be addressed.

    Does it suck we always fish in these flawed waters to plug those holes?  Absolutely.....but it would've been roster malfeasance to walk in to the season without a better Plan B.  And yes, Bader quite clearly represents a better Plan B.

    With the important caveat that Martin or someone of lesser stature (be it financial commitment or service time) won't get the same leash. In that way I don't believe the complaint is misplaced. 

    Eh, Martin torpedoing your season and Bader saving it seems a little hyperbolic. I think it's just as likely we get to August and we're asking why this club is still investing time in Bader. 

    I think the positives Bader brings will be outweighed by his misuse. . 

    2 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    With the important caveat that Martin or someone of lesser stature (be it financial commitment or service time) won't get the same leash. In that way I don't believe the complaint is misplaced. 

    Eh, Martin torpedoing your season and Bader saving it seems a little hyperbolic. I think it's just as likely we get to August and we're asking why this club is still investing time in Bader. 

    I think the positives Bader brings will be outweighed by his misuse. . 

    Martin playing CF with a fly ball pitching staff is absolutely a major problem for this team.  That day in/day out defensive issue would cost this team significantly depending upon how long it's required.  If we can't agree to that, then it circles back to the fact that posters simply aren't putting enough value on the role of defense at a critical position.

    To put it simply - Castro and Martin's 60 starts in CF were absolutely a contributing reason why we missed the playoffs.

    Whoever the RH hitting OF is, is going to get played.  That's what the current FO believes in, without Bader those at-bats were going to be Martin.  Now, if they are Martin, it's because we're several levels down the depth chart.  As it should be.

    1 minute ago, TheLeviathan said:

    Martin playing CF with a fly ball pitching staff is absolutely a major problem for this team.  That day in/day out defensive issue would cost this team significantly depending upon how long it's required.  If we can't agree to that, then it circles back to the fact that posters simply aren't putting enough value on the role of defense at a critical position.

    To put it simply - Castro and Martin's 60 starts in CF were absolutely a contributing reason why we missed the playoffs.

    Whoever the RH hitting OF is, is going to get played.  That's what the current FO believes in, without Bader those at-bats were going to be Martin.  Now, if they are Martin, it's because we're several levels down the depth chart.  As it should be.

    Yeah I'm not exactly excited about Austin Martin getting starts in CF. I'm probably less excited about a France, Bader, Vazquez 7-9. They could've held water defensively in CF with less investment. Clearly, the Twins want Bader's bat as well. I disagree. 

    2 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Yeah I'm not exactly excited about Austin Martin getting starts in CF. I'm probably less excited about a France, Bader, Vazquez 7-9. They could've held water defensively in CF with less investment. Clearly, the Twins want Bader's bat as well. I disagree. 

    Maybe with less investment, but they weren't going to shop at the big boy table and that's just a fact I've had beaten into me since Terry Ryan.  It is what it is.

    We're 100% on the same page about France.  And I keep hoping to see that Vazquez trade happen.

    2 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    We've been over this; he hasn't faced LHP since 2019.

    Having 300 PAs is a lot for never facing them. 

    2 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Nobody is the "4th OF," with the way this team platoons,

    Actually, you'll easily be able to tell the 4th OF. It's the one that, at the start of the season, isn't starting as many games. 

    2 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    What a comp....

    Why, in your mind, was he valuable in his career despite having a career OPS+ of only 87?

    He's a bad, awful hitter, comparable to Bader actually. Was it malfeasance to allow him to get over 10,000 plate appearances in his career? 

    21 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    Having 300 PAs is a lot for never facing them. 

    Actually, you'll easily be able to tell the 4th OF. It's the one that, at the start of the season, isn't starting as many games. 

    Why, in your mind, was he valuable in his career despite having a career OPS+ of only 87?

    He's a bad, awful hitter, comparable to Bader actually. Was it malfeasance to allow him to get over 10,000 plate appearances in his career? 

    Ok, we've covered this part too. 300 is the COMBINED CAREER number of PAs for BOTH Larnach and Wallner over 6-7 seasons...

    New Girl Facepalm GIF by HULU

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...