Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    How Rare Is This? The Weird Timing Of Falvey’s Departure

    Spoiler: very.

    Eric Blonigen

    Twins Video

    Derek Falvey and the Twins shockingly parted ways on Friday, a mere week and a half before pitchers and catchers report to the Lee Health Sports Complex in Fort Myers. This “mutual” parting of ways has wide-ranging implications for the 2026 season, and raises no few questions that will be explored here on Twins Daily in the coming days.

    One such is this: are there even historical precedents for a GM or analogue to jump ship or get fired (depending on how you interpret Tom Pohlad and Derek Falvey’s statements) this late in the offseason, just when teams are preparing to ramp up for the season?

     

    After all, there are myriad reasons why the timing is truly awful. It creates unnecessary chaos and complexity. It threatens the perceived job security of coaches and executives. It threatens to dispirit players, some of whom have already openly questioned the organization. It’s too late to ask teams for permission to interview their executives, drying up the talent pool, and practically forcing the Twins' hand in elevating Jeremy Zoll. It adds responsibility to his purview, and by extension, likely his assistant GMs as well, without ample time to ramp up. All of these things conspire to make Pohlad’s stated goal of competing this season an even tougher needle to thread. In short, Friday’s announcement just doesn’t make sense; at least not now.

    So, surely, the situation the Twins find themselves in must be pretty rare. Turns out, it is, indeed. After some digging, there are only two other examples of executives departing on the eve of spring training, and both happened in situations not dissimilar to that of the 2026 Twins.

    The Firee: Dan Duquette, Boston Red Sox, 2002
    The Red Sox fired Dan Duquette on March 1, 2002, smack dab in the middle of spring training. In terms of tenure, success rate, and fan perception, there are some real similarities to Falvey’s time with the Twins, as well as some potential hints for the future.

    Prior to being fired, Duquette had an eight-year run as the Red Sox GM. He made the playoffs just three times, and in those appearances won only two total games. He angered fans when he let the popular (and talented) father of Kody Clemens leave in free agency, and fans weren’t enamored with his communication style with the media either.

    Heading into the 2001 season, Duquette went big on the free agent market, signing Manny Ramirez to a massive-at-the-time eight-year, $160 million deal. With Pedro Martinez on the books, as well as a number of other contracts that were well above average, the Red Sox had the second-highest payroll in baseball behind only the Yankees. The payroll didn’t correspond to success that season, as the team dealt with injuries and underperformance, and finished just over .500. Duquette fired his Manager, Jimy Williams, mid-season after a high-profile disagreement with a player.

    Oh. By the way. Duquette was fired by the John Henry’s group not 24 hours after they became the new owners of the Red Sox. They replaced him by promoting Mike Port, Duquette’s VP of Baseball Operations. He lasted just one season before ownership ultimately hired Theo Epstein to take the reins of the core of talented draftees and veterans in their prime that Duquette had assembled. Three years after Duquette’s firing, the Red Sox began their dynasty.

    Could Falvey's departure be a simple case of "not my guy?" Or something closer to a scapegoat? Pohlad said on Friday "the vision is probably a little bit different than what it was before. The landscape is different, and that it's best for both of us, if we if we make a change, and best for the Minnesota Twins." Make of that what you will.

    The Quitter: Bob Watson, New York Yankees, 1998
    Bob Watson was a former player, turned coach, turned general manager. His brief stint in the role lasted just two seasons, and they shone. In 1996, he and rookie manager Joe Torre took the Yankees to the World Series where they defeated the Atlanta Braves. The following season, they made the playoffs again, but didn’t advance past the ALDS. On February 3, 1998, Watson resigned and he was replaced by Brian Cashman.

    Ok. So. Neither tenure nor results match up with Falvey’s, but you know what just might? Watson’s reason for quitting. In short, he was frequently at loggerheads with owner George Steinbrenner. “The Boss” had a habit of micromanaging his GMs, to the point of pushing for specific trades and negotiating around them with other GMs and owners. In fact, he was responsible for acquiring Chuck Knoblach from the Twins.

    In 1997, Steinbrenner repeatedly attempted to get Watson to move Jorge Posada and a number of prospects for Rickey Henderson, and publicly lambasted his GM for not making specific moves that Steinbrenner wanted to see happen, and for trading for players he himself wouldn’t. It got to the point that Watson would tell rival GMs he was out on a deal “'unless I get orders from south of New York.’ ", referencing Steinbrenner’s Florida home.

    Eventually, Watson had enough. After he resigned, a Yankees official told the New York Times: “I don't know if he wants to be a general manager anymore. Maybe he doesn't need the pressure. I don't know that he wants another general manager's job. I don't know if he wants to stay in baseball. I imagine he's disgusted with Steinbrenner.”

    If we are looking for parallels, it’s easy to find them. After all, like George Steinbrenner, Tom Pohlad seems to believe he understands just how to run a baseball team. Unlike Steinbrenner, however, Pohlad is new to the game, and his diametrically opposed dictates reflect that. To wit: “no half measures” and “we will be competitive in 2026”, are in conflict with "yes, our payroll is down from last year” and the whole, you know, not really having a bullpen you trust with a one-run lead in a playoff push.

    Really, when you look at it, Falvey’s departure combines themes from both of these case studies.

    On one side of the equation, you have new ownership, likely disappointed with middling results, a disengaged fanbase, and questionable baseball decisions by the GM (albeit with the former owner's blessing and, in part, because of unexpected financial constraints placed on him).

    On the other side, you have the owner, perhaps out of hubris, assuming he knows the way to right the ship despite little to indicate such, who, in his confidence, creates an unwinnable and frustrating work environment for the GM.

    That’s the sort of conflict that leads to a parting of ways, even if the initiating party remains opaque. As it stands, this development probably doesn’t help the Twins’ chances in 2026, but it sure does continue the palace intrigue that began with Joe Pohlad's ouster. One thing that's certain is that there's no shortage of confidence among the Pohlad family.

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    18 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    I'm not "team Tom" I'm team get Falvey the *(&^out of here. It's the team I've been on for several years.

    Falvey is now gone so the biggest problem with the Twins has been removed from the situation. I'm happy about that. This Twins team doesn't resemble the "no half-measures" type of owner Tom says he wants to be.

    So you agree then Toms expectations is unreasonable.   Thats all I was asking for.   Thanks.  

    As for half measure owner,  we now have an owner with no experience and a GM of baseball ops that has 1 year of experience.   Sure seems like a 1/2 measure.   An owner who has unrealistic expectations and Zoll who has been thrust into the roll after gaining his role last year.   

    Another 1/2 measure,  what has Tom done about that bullpen? 

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    Pohlad set the bar. Here's our strategy. Falvey failed to adapt and ran things business as usual. You know what you have to do when the owner says "here's our strategy"? You follow it. Falvey couldn't do it. Whether it was ego or lack of ability, Falvey didn't operate within the lines of the new strategy and he got fired for it. Falvey could have adapted and stuck around, instead he challenged the boss and lost.

    I'm going to make a few assumptions here that could change my opinion of how this all went down if they aren't true:

    1. Tom had no involvement in the trade deadline strategy.  I haven't seen anything to suggest that he did.

    2. Falvey wasn't leaving meaningful budgeted money on the table in this offseason.  Comments from both Tom's camp and Falvey's camp seem to suggest there's room for another modestly-priced reliever, but nothing that would suggest a budget even approaching last year's budget

    3. The decision to part ways happened a few weeks ago.  Again, this seems to have been suggested by both Tom and Falvey

    4. Tom's strategy is insisting that the roster they had at the end of last season minus approx. $30MM in payroll budget will be competitive in 2026.

    If all that is true, then there was no possible way for Falvey to execute ownership's strategy on the baseball side of things, and certainly not by mid-January.  The strategy is built upon the ideas that the team is good enough to compete as is with a drastically reduced budget, and that simply retaining players that were already a part of this failed roster constitutes giving the fans hope. That is an objectively terrible strategy.

    If Falvey was failing on the business side of things (which he never should've been put in charge of to begin with, to be honest), then Tom could've relieved him of just that portion of his responsibilities.  If Falvey had left over that (plausible), then we're talking about a mutual parting, not a firing.

    Ask yourselves this: if you are continuing to insist that the roster Falvey put together under the constraints listed above will be competitive, why would he need to be fired?  If you had already determined that he was going to be fired, why'd you trot him out front and center at TwinsFest?  If Falvey's vision was so unworkable, then why are you handing the reigns over to his inexperienced underling?  As far as I know, there's nothing interim about Zoll's current position.

    This isn't to say that Falvey was doing a great job or anything.  There are strong arguments that he could've been justifiably fired at multiple points going back to at least the end of the 2024 season.  But to suggest that Tom had needed time to evaluate the direction of the organization as if he was some complete outsider isn't really accurate.  Tom hadn't been involved in all the day-to-day operations, but he wasn't completely out of the loop either.  He was already on the board of directors.  He'd been heavily involved in the sale process.  He should've been at least semi-aware of the operations and the direction the team had chosen at the deadline.  If he thought that Falvey's team outlook didn't align with his preferred strategy going forward, then he should've shown him the door at the same time as Joe.  It was reported that the decision to pull Joe out and replace thim with Tom happened about a month before the switch was announced.  These conversations about alignment on strategy should've been happening at that time.  But once you've decided to keep him, then you have to let Falvey's execution on the baseball side play out.  If/when the team shows that isn't competitive, you fire him then and have Zoll handle the trade deadline.  But to fire him now due to improper execution of a strategy implemented after last year's trade deadline makes no sense to me.

    21 minutes ago, bunsen82 said:

    So you agree then Toms expectations is unreasonable.   Thats all I was asking for.   Thanks.  

    As for half measure owner,  we now have an owner with no experience and a GM of baseball ops that has 1 year of experience.   Sure seems like a 1/2 measure.   An owner who has unrealistic expectations and Zoll who has been thrust into the roll after gaining his role last year.   

    Another 1/2 measure,  what has Tom done about that bullpen? 

    No, we don't. Tom set the expections he wasn't a half-measures guy. Falvey employed half-measures. We're almost to pitchers/catchers reporting so Falvey got fired for not meeting expectations. Not sure if there's enough time left in the offseason to change directions or make bold moves or whatever. 

    I do think it's unreasonable to expect the current roster to be competitive. 

    Tom Pohlad has substantial experience as a CEO and being the head of businesses. I'm not sure where you're going with this? You think the owners are lottery winners who just bought the franchise out of the blue? Jeremy Zoll has 15 years of front office experience starting in 2011 with the Reds, then moving on to being a scouting coordinator with the Angels before becoming the assistant director of player development with the Dodgers (similar to Falvey's role before the Twins hired him). The Twins brought Zoll in as director of MiLB operations, promoting him to assistant GM in 2020, operating as an assistant GM for 5 years, replacing Thad Levine as general manager for 2025.

    What has Tom Pohlad done with the bullpen? He's the owner, not not the GM or president of baseball. If you're mad about the bullpen, that's on Falvey.

    Owner role = provide sufficient resources to field a team which can meet ownership's expectations for on the field performance. Determine overall business vision and objectives. Hold the front office accountable for following through with strategies that align with business vision and objectives. If it's not inside that scope, it's not Tom Pohlad's wheel house.

     

    18 minutes ago, The Great Hambino said:

    ...4. Tom's strategy is insisting that the roster they had at the end of last season minus approx. $30MM in payroll budget will be competitive in 2026.

    If all that is true, then there was no possible way for Falvey to execute ownership's strategy on the baseball side of things, and certainly not by mid-January.  The strategy is built upon the ideas that the team is good enough to compete as is with a drastically reduced budget, and that simply retaining players that were already a part of this failed roster constitutes giving the fans hope. That is an objectively terrible strategy...

    I didn't read that at all. Tom has stated the Twins will be competitive in 2026. Falvey didn't change the team up. I'll go ahead and build the roster that you say is impossible in the offseason blueprint and put it here.

    2 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    I didn't read that at all. Tom has stated the Twins will be competitive in 2026. Falvey didn't change the team up. I'll go ahead and build the roster that you say is impossible in the offseason blueprint and put it here.

    Tom is still insisting that the team will be competitive in 2026.  He said that explicitly during is media rounds after they announced Falvey is leaving.  That is a completely unrealistic expectation

    ETA: he also said this while begging reporters to "get off of payroll", meaning he is expecting this to be accomplished with diminished resources. 

    1 hour ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Tom is still insisting that the team will be competitive in 2026.  He said that explicitly during is media rounds after they announced Falvey is leaving.  That is a completely unrealistic expectation

    ETA: he also said this while begging reporters to "get off of payroll", meaning he is expecting this to be accomplished with diminished resources. 

    ...and he's also said there is time left in the offseason. Remains to be seen if there's enough to make major changes. We could be seeing a move of Lopez, etc. Who knows?

    5 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    ...and he's also said there is time left in the offseason. Remains to be seen if there's enough to make major changes. We could be seeing a move of Lopez, etc. Who knows?

    He's on record that he's against trading any of their all-stars.  Keeping them is part of his strategy because he foolishly believes that constitutes doing something for the fans.  If I'm wrong - and to be clear, I hope I am because this roster is screaming for a rebuild and delaying moving Lopez/Ryan just serves to diminish their potential returns (especially Ryan) - then I would expect one or both to be moved before Opening Day.  If that happens, then I'll happily concede that it was Falvey going against ownership wishes in retaining those assets

    14 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    ...and he's also said there is time left in the offseason. Remains to be seen if there's enough to make major changes. We could be seeing a move of Lopez, etc. Who knows?

    I don't even understand what you're arguing....Tom believes that in early February they're going to make blockbuster deals to make the team better immediately while dealing their best players?

    Is that what you think Falvey was standing in the way of?  This non-existent trade idea?

    14 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I don't even understand what you're arguing....Tom believes that in early February they're going to make blockbuster deals to make the team better immediately while dealing their best players?

    Is that what you think Falvey was standing in the way of?  This non-existent trade idea?

    He thinks 95% of the problems were related to Falvey.  Thats at best what I can figure,  and that Falvey was holding up improving the team,  even though that was going to be the only way he could keep his job.  Its some pretty convoluted thinking.  It just shows how much Bean disliked Falvey.  

    3 minutes ago, bunsen82 said:

    He thinks 95% of the problems were related to Falvey.  Thats at best what I can figure,  and that Falvey was holding up improving the team,  even though that was going to be the only way he could keep his job.  Its some pretty convoluted thinking.  It just shows how much Bean disliked Falvey.  

    I mean....I was happy to move on from Falvey.  However...if we're moving on because our current Russian Nesting Doll of Pohlads is on "Tom" and Tom looks at the 2025 Twins, with even less payroll, after a major sell-off, and sees a roster set to transform into a 2026 "contender".....then I'm not sure I can throw fault at the feet of Falvey for not being some kind of wizard to pull that off.

     

    1 minute ago, TheLeviathan said:

    I mean....I was happy to move on from Falvey.  However...if we're moving on because our current Russian Nesting Doll of Pohlads is on "Tom" and Tom looks at the 2025 Twins, with even less payroll, after a major sell-off, is going to transform into a 2026 "contender".....then I'm not sure I can throw fault at the feet of Falvey for not being some kind of wizard to pull that off.

     

    If there's a silver lining to any of this, it means that Tom is much more concerned with their short-term prospects at the expense of long-term prospects (without any actual investment in terms of dollars), which could be an indication that they're looking to go back to market with the franchise post-CBA/TV rights renewals.   Why care about what happens past 2028 if you're looking to sell the team?  It's a flawed argument, but one you can see if you squint hard enough.

    Just now, The Great Hambino said:

    If there's a silver lining to any of this, it means that Tom is much more concerned with their short-term prospects at the expense of long-term prospects (without any actual investment in terms of dollars), which could be an indication that they're looking to go back to market with the franchise post-CBA/TV rights renewals.   Why care about what happens past 2028 if you're looking to sell the team?  It's a flawed argument, but one you can see if you squint hard enough.

    Black Widow Avengers GIF

    On 2/2/2026 at 11:30 AM, bean5302 said:

    I didn't read that at all. Tom has stated the Twins will be competitive in 2026. Falvey didn't change the team up. I'll go ahead and build the roster that you say is impossible in the offseason blueprint and put it here.

     

    Here's your blueprint.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...