Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Gold Glove Is Mauer Or Miss


    Ted Schwerzler

    If you’ve watched even a handful of Twins games in 2017, you’ve no doubt witnessed Joe Mauer make difficult plays look routine at first base. He’s an incredible athlete that has transformed himself into an elite fielder at a new position. While there may be some question as to whether or not a Gold Glove push is coming solely from Twins Territory, I’m here to tell you it’s a discussion that should be taking place on the national stage.

    Image courtesy of © Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Getting this out of the way early, Joe Mauer went 89 games into 2017 before making an error. He had put together an incredible streak that included something like 600 chances. While those numbers are great, his fielding percentage and lack of errors is just about the last thing you should take into account when understanding why the Minnesota first basemen in Gold Glove worthy.

    For those that shy away from sabermetrics, understand this is your warning. For an award that is doled out in relation to defensive prowess, the best measurements of effectiveness are quite a ways down the rabbit hole. While defensive sabermetrics are far from flawless, they go a long way towards explaining what the eye tells us, and are significantly more effective than anything else we have at our disposal. With that disclaimer out of the way, let’s get into it.

    First and foremost, let’s take a look at what nabbed the award a year ago. Mitch Moreland grabbed a Gold Glove, and despite the sometimes poor decisions for the award (I’m looking at you Eric Hosmer), was a deserving recipient. Moreland posted 7 DRS (2nd), 6.4 UZR (1st), 9.2 UZR/150 (1st), and a 5.0 RngR (1st) a season ago. While Chris Davis had a solid season of his own, Moreland was clearly the best AL first basemen. Sadly, we again see the flawed process as Hosmer wound up the third finalist. Across the board, he was the worst defensive 1B among qualified players.

    So, with 2016 as a bench mark for understanding, let’s take a look at Mauer’s numbers in 2017. For Minnesota, Mauer owns 5 DRS (3rd), 6.5 UZR (1st), 10.6 UZR/150 (1st), 3.9 RngR (1st). Not only is Mauer pacing the American League in virtually every important category, but his numbers are also in line with or better than Moreland’s a season ago. In fact, expanding things a bit further, the only qualified first basemen with better numbers than Mauer in 2017 is the Giants Brandon Belt (who should run away with the NL award).

    At this point, we can see what the numbers tell us, it’s also important to understand what they mean. Defensive runs saved (DRS) for first basemen are generally a lower amount and less indicative of effectiveness. Given their opportunities on the field, pushing that number to swell in the same vein as an outfielder like Byron Buxton can accomplish is a difficult task. Ultimate zone rating and range runs are where first basemen can truly separate themselves however.

    UZR is blanket stat that values defensive ability as a whole. It’s composed (for a first basemen) of DPR (double-play runs), RngR (range runs), and ErrR (error runs). As the total number rises, it signifies the overall ability of a certain player. As the sum of all components, we have a numerical measurement of how well the player does everything being demanded of them at their position. Range runs are a separating metric at first because it helps to quantify reactions and athleticism. As fangraphs puts it “Is the player an Ozzie Smith or an Adam Dunn.” While virtually all first basemen should be able to make the play charging in, Mauer has shown an exceptional ability to react laterally, as well as cover ground.

    For most baseball fans, it’s been relatively easy to see that Joe Mauer is playing well above an average level just simply by watching a game. Whether a Twins fan or not, there’s little room for bias when it comes to just how exceptional the body of work has proven to be. When you dive into the numbers a bit further, it only helps to make the argument stronger and quantify what you should already know.

    Over the years, the Gold Glove has become a tainted award criticized for the inclusion of offensive prowess and the marketable name. As mentioned above, Eric Hosmer won three straight from 2013-15, despite never being a top three candidate any of those years. That being said, whether or not Mauer ends bring the award back to Minnesota, he should be considered the frontrunner without a shadow of a doubt.

    We can only hope that the voting contingent make the correct decision and award the trophy properly. If they do so, Mauer would join Darin Erstad and Placido Polanco as the only three players to win a Gold Glove at multiple positions. He would obviously be the first to do so at catcher and first base. It’s fair to be a bit down about a lack of thump from a corner infielder, but there’s no denying that Mauer has been a difference maker in the field, and a Gold Glove would only help to cement that notion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Walker Jenkins

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, OF
    In his first rehab game since hurting his shoulder, the Twins top prospect went 4-for-5 with a double and a long home run. for Fort Myers.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    From the article:

    First and foremost, let’s take a look at what nabbed the award a year ago. Mitch Moreland grabbed a Gold Glove, and despite the sometimes poor decisions for the award (I’m looking at you Eric Hosmer), was a deserving recipient. Moreland posted 7 DRS (2nd), 6.4 UZR (1st), 9.2 UZR/150 (1st), and a 5.0 RngR (1st) a season ago.

     

    Some of those ranks are incorrect which you can check on your own. This was a down year for AL 1B defense, Moreland's rank in the MLB last year was 15th.

     

    The best 1B defenders in the AL last year were Byungho Park and Travis Shaw, neither of which were going to win the award over Moreland. So yeah, popularity contest. Remember, there is no minimum innings qualification for the Gold Glove, but a decent sanity check would be to use the pitching qualification of 162 innings at the position.

    Edited by Doomtints

    Some of those ranks are incorrect which you can check on your own. This was a down year for AL 1B defense, Moreland's rank in the MLB last year was 15th.

     

    The best 1B defenders in the AL last year were Byungho Park and Travis Shaw, neither of which were going to win the award over Moreland. So yeah, popularity contest. Remember, there is no minimum innings qualification for the Gold Glove, but a decent sanity check would be to use the pitching qualification of 162 innings at the position.

    No, that's not a reasonable innings qualification at all.

    Defensive metrics have zero value at 100 to 200 innings.

    Moreland doesn't even drop below 2nd place until you get below 290 innings - that's 33 games.

    He doesn't drop below 5th place until you get below 206 innings - or 23 games.

     

    Suggesting Mitch Moreland won a gold glove because of his popularity is totally off base.

     

    Can you guess who is 1st this year using your tiny innings standard? Kennys Vargas.

    Last year for QUALIFYING AL 1Bs, Moreland WAS 2nd in AL with 7 DRS, his UZR WAS 1st at 6.7, his UZR/150 WAS 1st at 9.2, and his RnGR WAS 1st at 5.0.  So all four of those were right.

     

    Now, if we expand it to players with only 700 or more innings, 13 AL 1Bs show up; however, three of Morelands ranks stay the same, the only one that changes is RnGR from 1st to 2nd.

     

    So the paragraph WAS right cause these ranking have to include players who played enough for the ranking to mean anything. Park barely had 200 innings at 1B, and Shaw didn't reach 300 innings.   Voters SHOULDN"T take their performances into any kind of consideration nor should anyone doing an article.  Gold glove consideration for only 162 innings for position players would be a HORRIBLE idea.  That's not even 20 games.

    Edited by jimmer

     

    No, that's not a reasonable innings qualification at all.
    Defensive metrics have zero value at 100 to 200 innings.

     

    Nevertheless, GGs have been awarded to players who played less than 30 games at the position. Which brings us back to what I said, it's a popularity contest. Feel free to take your argument up with the people who voted for Rafael Palmiero in 1999. You are shooting at the messenger because you don't want to admit that the GG is worthless.

    Edited by Doomtints

    Nevertheless, GGs have been awarded to players who played less than 30 games at the position. Which brings us back to what I said, it's a popularity contest. Feel free to take your argument up with the people who voted for Rafael Palmiero in 1999. You are shooting at the messenger because you don't want to admit that the GG is worthless.

    Just because it was a popularity contest in 1999, which I don't think anyone disagrees with, doesn't mean it still is.

     

    Look at how many Jeter won. There was a time when it was more or less a popularity contest.

    Not everyone believes Jeter's GGs where entirely undeserved.

     

    He was a good, reliable SS.  Always in the right place, never made the wrong play, strong and accurate arm, not prone to errors.  Range challenged but not to the extent of current urban legend.

     

     

    Not everyone believes Jeter's GGs where entirely undeserved.

     

    He was a good, reliable SS. Always in the right place, never made the wrong play, strong and accurate arm, not prone to errors. Range challenged but not to the extent of current urban legend.

    Fine, but good and reliable shouldn't be GG worthy.

    I don't think he wins them if he's a good, reliable SS hitting .220 in Oakland.

    I believe that Joe Mauer is deserving of a Gold Glove award and to win it at multiple positions would be a really amazing accomplishment. I only know about these two players having done it:

     

    Darin Erstad won 3 GG (2 in OF and 1 at 1B) and Placido Polanco won 3 GG (2 at 2B and 1 at 3B).

     

    So, I think he would be the first catcher to accomplish the feat.

     

    Craig Biggio (HOF) won a Silver Slugger as a catcher and also was an All-Star as a catcher, but all 4 of his GG awards were as a 2B.

     

    Fine, but good and reliable shouldn't be GG worthy.
    I don't think he wins them if he's a good, reliable SS hitting .220 in Oakland.

    That's a fair point, probably true.  I'll concede it, but also suggest that may be more a publicity issue than a popularity one.

     

    But overall, I believe the exceptions prove the rule.  

    I'd also say the voting wasn't based on popularity so much as it was on fame. For one, too many of the voters weren't informed league wide. For another, fielding measurements amounted almost entirely to fielding percentage and total errors.

     

    I don't think these guys were voting for players because the players were popular, they were voting for players because all they had to work with was assumptions and "talk of the town" kind of hearsay. It wasn't nefarious collusion, it was lack of information. Largely due to the era but probably also due to a lack of effort to research the correct option.

    Rey Ordóñez, his 3 gold gloves, and career .246 batting average (.216 the season he won the first) beg to disagree.

    I think you misunderstand my point.

    I wasn't saying a lite hitting SS from nonNY team X couldn't win them.

    I said that a guy who was average , at best, defensively- as Jeter was, wouldn't have won them if he was hitting .220 in Oakland.

    I think you misunderstand my point.

    I wasn't saying a lite hitting SS from nonNY team X couldn't win them.

    I said that a guy who was average , at best, defensively- as Jeter was, wouldn't have won them if he was hitting .220 in Oakland.

    Plus he was an NY ss technically...

     

    I think being able to hit a little AND field at an elite level should be considered, if only as a tie breaker. Just my opinion...

     

    If Park was rated highly as a 1b despite the affinity for fielding throws in the baseline, i can't support those ratings for first basemen. Maybe we should track digs as a stat.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...