Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Does the AJ Minter Trade Prove Tom Pohlad Is Serious About Spending?

    For a franchise that has historically avoided taking on money, the AJ Minter deal may represent a meaningful shift in philosophy.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Vincent Carchietta, IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins made their first splash of the 2026 trade deadline late Thursday evening, acquiring left-handed reliever AJ Minter from the New York Mets in exchange for Bruin Agbayani and Billy Amick. On the surface, it was exactly the type of move Twins fans had been hoping to see. The bullpen desperately needed another late-inning arm, and Minter immediately gives Minnesota one of the better left-handed relievers available on the market.

    As exciting as the addition itself was, an even more intriguing detail surfaced shortly afterward.

    In his trade recap for The Athletic, Will Sammon reported, "Minter is owed $3.3 million after Monday before becoming a free agent this offseason. The Mets are not paying down any of the remaining salary, said a person with knowledge of the situation."

    For most organizations, that line probably wouldn't generate much discussion. For the Twins, though, it stands out.

    For years, Minnesota has operated differently than many contenders at the trade deadline. Rather than simply absorbing contracts, the Twins have often preferred to include additional prospect value in exchange for financial relief. When they acquired Chris Paddack from the Padres and Jorge López from the Orioles, both trades included cash considerations to help offset the remaining salary. There are many more examples. That has become part of the organization's identity. If there was an opportunity to have the selling team eat money, the Twins almost always took it.

    That's what makes the Minter trade feel different.

    Minter is making $11 million this season before becoming a free agent this winter. While Minnesota is only responsible for the final $3.3 million, that's still a significant investment for roughly two months of relief pitching. This is an organization that has rarely shown a willingness to spend that kind of money on a bullpen arm. As The Athletic's Dan Hayes pointed out on X, the last time the Twins had an $11 million reliever on their roster was Joe Nathan.

    The Twins obviously aren't paying Minter's full salary, but paying more than $3 million for two months of a reliever is still noteworthy. To put that into perspective, Taylor Rogers entered the season as the highest-paid reliever on the roster at $2 million. The Twins are now paying roughly 50 percent more than that for just the final two months of Minter's contract.

    That may not seem like a huge financial commitment compared to many of baseball's biggest spenders, but it represents a noticeable departure from how the Twins have traditionally approached these types of deals.

    It also happens to align with everything Tom Pohlad has been saying publicly.

    Ahead of the trade deadline in an interview with the media, Pohlad acknowledged that if the Twins want to become the kind of organization they aspire to be, they can't continue operating with one of the league's smaller payrolls. "We might have a magical year this year, but a $100 million payroll is not going to get the job done for trying to accomplish the kinds of things we want to accomplish."

    Those comments were encouraging, but they were still only words. Twins fans have heard optimistic messaging before. What they've wanted to see is action.

    While one trade certainly doesn't erase years of frustration, this is at least an encouraging first step. The Twins had every opportunity to ask the Mets to pay down part of Minter's remaining salary. Instead, they simply took on the contract themselves. That may not be groundbreaking around Major League Baseball, but it absolutely is in Minnesota.

    It also raises an interesting question about whether Pohlad truly intends to operate differently than previous generations of ownership. Nobody should be declaring victory after one move, and one $3.3 million commitment doesn't suddenly erase years of payroll limitations. More moves will have to follow before anyone can confidently say that the first name matters more than the last name.

    Still, if Pohlad was looking for a way to begin changing the perception surrounding the organization, this was a pretty good place to start.

    Perhaps the biggest takeaway isn't AJ Minter himself. It's what this newfound willingness to absorb salary could mean over the next few days.

    If the Twins are genuinely willing to take on contracts instead of insisting that the selling club pay down salary, their list of potential trade targets becomes significantly larger. Expensive players naturally require less prospect capital because the acquiring team is assuming the financial burden. For years, that market has essentially been closed to Minnesota.

    Take Kevin Gausman as an example. The veteran right-hander is still owed more than $7 million over the remainder of this season on an expiring deal. Under the Twins' previous operating philosophy, a contract like that likely would have been a nonstarter unless Toronto agreed to eat a substantial portion of the money while receiving a better prospect package in return.

    If the Twins are actually willing to absorb contracts like that, the equation changes dramatically. Instead of paying with premium prospects, the Twins can use payroll flexibility as part of the acquisition cost. That opens the door to talented veterans who may have previously been unavailable simply because of the dollars attached to their contracts.

    There's still a long way to go before the trade deadline passes, and one move doesn't establish a trend. The Twins will ultimately be judged by what they do over the next several days, not just by their first trade.

    Even so, it's hard to ignore the symbolism of this deal. After an offseason full of promises, followed by Pohlad publicly saying that a $100 million payroll isn't enough to accomplish the organization's goals, the Twins responded by making a move they simply haven't made in the past. Paying the entirety of Minter's remaining salary won't make headlines across baseball, but in Minnesota it represents a meaningful philosophical shift.

    Maybe it's just one trade. Maybe it's the first sign of a new way of doing business. Either way, it's a promising start.


    What do you make of the Twins absorbing the rest of Minter's salary? Is this the first indication that Tom Pohlad is serious about increasing payroll, or do you need to see more before believing things have truly changed? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Walker Jenkins

    St. Paul Saints - AAA, OF
    For the second time this week, and the third time this month, the Twins top prospect has hit two home runs in a game. He's 3-for-3 today with a walk and also stole his 16th base. Likely one more PA today.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    15 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Joe Pohlad was the executive chair of the Minnesota Twins. They may have changed the title, but I think you're reaching pretty far to think Joe wasn't running things. Their press release even states that Tom replaced Joe. Tom's statement included a statement about how Joe "lead the organization." Tom's title has more to do with now having minority owners than it does anything about their 2 roles.

    I think you'd find it hard to find anyone involved in or close to the org that would say Joe wasn't running things.

    Joe Pohlad was the spokesperson or representative more than a decision "maker." He relayed decisions and positions from ownership. Controlling owners make decisions, though the actual ownership would be involved in major financial decisions.

    Financial Owners - The Pohlad Family (Jim, Bill and Bob)
    Controlling Owners - Historically, this was Jim. Joe never had this role. Jim was always chairman and controller. Tom now has this role, and this had to be approved by other MLB owners.

    https://www.mlb.com/news/jim-pohlad-steps-down-joe-pohlad-new-executive-chairman

    Joe spoke for the ownership, and while Joe may have made some decisions, he did not have the authority to make major decisions without Jim signing off. Joe was not an actual owner in any capacity.

    Tom actually MAKES the decisions.

    6 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Joe Pohlad was the spokesperson or representative more than a decision "maker." He relayed decisions and positions from ownership. Controlling owners make decisions, though the actual ownership would be involved in major financial decisions.

    Financial Owners - The Pohlad Family (Jim, Bill and Bob)
    Controlling Owners - Historically, this was Jim. Joe never had this role. Jim was always chairman and controller. Tom now has this role, and this had to be approved by other MLB owners.

    https://www.mlb.com/news/jim-pohlad-steps-down-joe-pohlad-new-executive-chairman

    Joe spoke for the ownership, and while Joe may have made some decisions, he did not have the authority to make major decisions without Jim signing off. Joe was not an actual owner in any capacity.

    Tom actually MAKES the decisions.

    I'll just leave it at "With this move, day-to-day leadership of the Twins will pass to a third generation of Pohlads." You literally provided a source saying Joe ran things day to day. This is a silly discussion. Everything thats ever been reported about the Joe Pohlad era was that he was running things. You literally provided the source stating as much. I'm very confused.

    10 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I'll just leave it at "With this move, day-to-day leadership of the Twins will pass to a third generation of Pohlads." You literally provided a source saying Joe ran things day to day. This is a silly discussion. Everything thats ever been reported about the Joe Pohlad era was that he was running things. You literally provided the source stating as much. I'm very confused.

    Whatever makes you feel better :)

    1 minute ago, bean5302 said:

    Whatever makes you feel better :)

    Your source literally says he ran the day to day while you're arguing he didn't. Its a pretty bold stance to take.

    But, whatever, you're right. Joe Pohlad, the worst public speaker in sports ownership history was only a mouthpiece and was widely reported to have been very upset with being replaced in his position by his big brother even though he was just the public whipping boy and laughing stock even though he wasn't actually running things even though your provided source literally said he was running things. 

    What a weird argument. I'm all good. My stance stands. Nothing Tom, or any other Pohlad says or does this year proves anything.

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    "Baby Bro" Pohlad was not an owner. He was a spokesperson for ownership so I doubt Joe had much to do with setting the team's budget or pushing the ownership for more funds. Tom Pohlad is the controlling owner.

    ? Joe and Tom are brothers. Unless you know something that is not public knowledge The Pohlad family owns the team. Jim Pohlad remains the main executive. Tom was elevated in the decision hierarchy.

    I’ve been a dedicated Twins fan since the late 60s. One thing I have observed about the Pohlad family is you can never go wrong by being skeptical of anything they say. I will judge them by their actions and not their words. So far Tom is jingling the Pohlad pocket change. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...