Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Cold Front: Breaking Down The First Twins Homestand


    Nick Nelson

    An April blizzard in Minneapolis – boy, isn't it sad you can't even bat an eye at that string of words? – raged deep into Tuesday night, blanketing Target Field in snow as Thursday afternoon's home opener rapidly approaches.

    MLB schedules were designed to account for inclement weather on the early end. But even with a continuing abundance of open dates, the Twins will face some challenges in their upcoming 10-game homestand. Not all of them weather-related.

    Image courtesy of Eric Bolte, USA Today (No, that's not Target Field. But, snow!)

    Twins Video

    MARINERS VS. TWINS

    3 Games | Thurs, 4/5 – Sun, 4/8

    Looking out the window as I write this, there is still no end to the snowfall in sight. I assume at some point it will peter out, but our new winter coating isn't likely to disappear quickly. The current forecast calls for highs to stay below freezing on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday.

    It works out nicely, I suppose, that Target Field will host a game on only one of those days. But we could see three first pitches at sub-40 temps in this series. This figures to make matters difficult for these scheduled starters:

    Thursday: LHP James Paxton v. RHP Kyle Gibson

    Saturday: RHP Mike Leake v. RHP Jose Berrios

    Sunday: LHP Marco Gonzales v. RHP Lance Lynn

    If the projected high of 29 on Saturday holds, the Twins would set a record for lowest game time starting temperature in Target Field history. Tough assignment for Berrios coming off a career-best performance in Baltimore.

    Of course, the ball won't exactly be flying off the bat in this chill. As Michael Rand recently pointed out, these conditions beg the question: how cold is too cold to play baseball? But as Rand notes, the Mariners don't have another trip to Minnesota, and that creates headaches with rescheduling. The same is true for the next visiting opponent.

    ASTROS VS. TWINS

    3 Games | Mon, 4/9 – Weds, 4/11

    As I turn away from the bleak apocalyptic setting outside, I dial up the MLB scoreboard on an app. Oh, look, the Yankees have slaughtered the Rays, and Didi Gregorius – perhaps the fourth-best hitter in their lineup – went 4-for-4 with eight RBIs. How nice.

    Being forced to think about that stacked roster, which has been resoundingly upgraded after knocking Minnesota out of the playoffs last October, served to harsh my good early season vibes. I do feel the Twins have played quite well in their first four games, despite the 2-2 outcome.

    But when you consider a team like the Yankees, you're reminded that the bar for a pennant in this league is quite high. And New York isn't even the class of the AL. That distinction belongs to the reigning champs, who head into town next week to give the Twins a major early-season test.

    The young and absurdly talented Astros have, unsurprisingly, picked up where they left off. As this blog post went to press, they were leading the Orioles and on their way to a fifth victory in six games. Jose Altuve's hitting almost .500. They look dominant.

    Hopefully the unfamiliar cold weather in Minnesota can throw them off their game. This series looks to be warmer than the previous one, but temperatures are not expected to escape the mid-40s.

    By this point, the Twins will have least had a few home games to acclimate themselves. In this light, you could perhaps view the timing of this meeting as slightly advantageous. But under no circumstance is Houston going to be an easy matchup.

    The offense is star-studded and relentless. And these probable pitching matchups are DAUNTING:

    Monday: RHP Justin Verlander v. RHP Jake Odorizzi

    Tuesday: LHP Dallas Keuchel v. RHP Kyle Gibson

    Wednesday: RHP Lance McCullers v. ???

    The final game of the Astros series represents the first time all year the Twins will need a fifth starter, although preceding cancellations could change that. Phil Hughes, working back from a "mild oblique strain," threw four innings in Triple-A on Saturday. He'll get to pitch in warm weather during his next rehab start at Ft. Myers on Thursday, but won't be so lucky if he takes the mound in Minnesota next week. There has to be some concern around his oblique tightening up in cold weather.

    But for now, that's a distant concern. We'll see how many games the Twins are able to get in leading up to that one. They might be able to stretch the four-starter arrangement out just a bit longer.

    WHITE SOX VS. TWINS

    4 Games | Thurs, 4/12 – Sun, 4/15

    This series looks like a welcome respite, for multiple reasons. The extended forecast calls for temps in the 50s, which would actually resemble baseball weather. And of course, the White Sox are not the Astros.

    This young Chicago club is probably more feisty and threatening than Kansas City or Detroit, but should be overmatched by the Twins anyway. It's probably the softest opponent of the month, and an opportunity to get a little fat before running the gauntlet of Indians-Rays-Yankees, all on the road.

    While it feels almost pointless to lay out probable starters this far out, here's how they'd currently shape up:

    Thursday: RHP Lucas Giolito v. RHP Jose Berrios

    Friday: RHP Reynaldo Lopez v. RHP Lance Lynn

    Saturday: RHP Miguel Gonzalez v. RHP Jake Odorizzi

    Sunday: RHP Michael Fulmer v. RHP Kyle Gibson

    Given the extreme likelihood of multiple rainouts (or freezeouts) before the White Sox series, those matchups are beyond tentative, but it gives you a look at the kind of favorable tilts Minnesota figures to see, regardless of how the names align.

    After wrapping up this series, the Twins get to escape the cold and head for a much warmer climate in Puerto Rico – a two-game series helpfully surrounded by a pair of off days. The Indians will supply Minnesota with its second early test.

    As it lines up now, Berrios would be starting the first game in his native territory. That's by design. But, you know about what they say about the best laid plans...

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I like the idea of starting off in division so that the games can be made up easier on a later date. I also like the idea of scheduling to warm weather home games early on (TB, HOU, TX, ARI, LA, ATL, etc, and I like the PR games as well). It wouldn't even bother me to have them play in warm weather environments in the south similar to the PR game. Bottom line is that I hate cold weather and therefore, I hate cold weather baseball.

    So, warm weather teams get few home games later in the year? I doubt they want that.

    Ironically / co-incidentally, the photo associated with this thread is of perhaps the most controversial "retractable roof" stadium ever built-- The Big O or Montreal's Olympic Stadium. It was designed for the '76 Olympics as was supposed to be the world's first retractable roof stadium. For the games, the roof would be off (as required by the IOC), and as the then future home of the Expos, the roof would be raised or lowered (kind of like a parachute) depending on the weather.

     

    As it turned out, it was many times over budget and never really worked. It is now in the permanently "down" position.

    I get that, but let's say you live near the ballpark and a game you have tickets for gets rained or snowed out. It gets rescheduled for a later date in the year. You can just go back then since you live there and see it. The travelling fans just spent the money to travel there and hotel room for nothing. I wish this was theoretical, but I only go to a few MLB games a year (if any depending in circumstances) and I almost always schedule the visits between June 1 and end of August. Yet I have only once had a visit for a series where at least one game wasn't cancelled and rescheduled to a later time if the year. It just stinks to have that happen. One time, I was only going to two games at Coors Field and both games were cancelled and rescheduled for like a month later. Money right down the toilet.

    That stinks for sure, I've never been to a delayed or cancelled game myself, maybe I'm just lucky or I just wait until May-August to go to games. I also feel like fans traveling to games are not all that common, the majority of people who attended games live in the area. I would be surprised if each game has more than a couple hundred of tourist fans at them. I'm a huge baseball fan and I've never traveled to a city specifically to attend a baseball game, I will go to games if I'm in a particular area for another reason but never to just see a game (granted I don't make a lot of money so that's never been an option for me). There's really no way they are going to run things specifically for a small group of people's convenience.

    That stinks for sure, I've never been to a delayed or cancelled game myself, maybe I'm just lucky or I just wait until May-August to go to games. I also feel like fans traveling to games are not all that common, the majority of people who attended games live in the area. I would be surprised if each game has more than a couple hundred of tourist fans at them. I'm a huge baseball fan and I've never traveled to a city specifically to attend a baseball game, I will go to games if I'm in a particular area for another reason but never to just see a game (granted I don't make a lot of money so that's never been an option for me). There's really no way they are going to run things specifically for a small group of people's convenience.

    while I disagree with your belief on the amount of traveling fans that go to games, I agree with the overall idea that parks are built with the hometown fans in mind. And obviously that makes sense.it should be that way, though it certainly doesn't take the sting away from the money wasted when one does travel and the game isn't played. For me, personally, the Rockies are the closest MLB team and they are 8 hours away. The LA teams and the DBacks are 10 hours away. Target is a 20 HR drive without stops. I have to travel if I wanna see a MLB game.

     

    So, warm weather teams get few home games later in the year? I doubt they want that.

    It's not about them Mike.  It's about me and my Twins.  I don't like cold weather baseball.  The Twins don't like cold weather baseball.  It's the price they should pay for living in a warm weather city.

    Baseball also needs to schedule more day games this time of year.

     

    I was just looking at the schedule, the games 4/9 and 4/10 with Houston are night games, forecast for 32/20 and 32/23 for the two days. 32 and sunny is a heck of a lot warmer than 20 degrees!!!!!! The sun is powerful this time of year, I was out at noon and even at 22 degrees it was melting the ice off the roads and steam was coming off the parking lots. 

     

    We can only hope that the Twins get used to the cold over the weekend so that the when the hot-house flowers from Houston come to town, worrying about neck gaiters and long underwear, the Twins are acclimated to it and just worrying about playing good ball.

    Baseball also needs to schedule more day games this time of year.

     

    I was just looking at the schedule, the games 4/9 and 4/10 with Houston are night games, forecast for 32/20 and 32/23 for the two days. 32 and sunny is a heck of a lot warmer than 20 degrees!!!!!! The sun is powerful this time of year, I was out at noon and even at 22 degrees it was melting the ice off the roads and steam was coming off the parking lots.

     

    We can only hope that the Twins get used to the cold over the weekend so that the when the hot-house flowers from Houston come to town, worrying about neck gaiters and long underwear, the Twins are acclimated to it and just worrying about playing good ball.

    It's hard to see day games during the school year being a great idea.

     

    It's hard to see day games during the school year being a great idea.

    Pick your poison, night games at 24 degrees or day games, at 32 degrees with sunshine. Pull up a chair on the west side your house this afternoon (provided you are in Minnesota), if you're out of the wind and in the sun, its actually pretty nice.

     

    Are the Twins going to get a higher attendance in the afternoon games in nicer weather or in the evening, even with the kids 'available', when everyone has to dress up in snow suits?  Remember, the Twins goal is to get more fannys in the seat so the can sell more $10 beers, $8 hot dogs, and all the other foodie items that are not cheap.

    Pick your poison, night games at 24 degrees or day games, at 32 degrees with sunshine. Pull up a chair on the west side your house this afternoon (provided you are in Minnesota), if you're out of the wind and in the sun, its actually pretty nice.

     

    Are the Twins going to get a higher attendance in the afternoon games in nicer weather or in the evening, even with the kids 'available', when everyone has to dress up in snow suits? Remember, the Twins goal is to get more fannys in the seat so the can sell more $10 beers, $8 hot dogs, and all the other foodie items that are not cheap.

    Neither? Also, as pointed out,tv hates day games. It's unusually cold this year. Happens sometimes. Not so that often, though.

     

    You must of had some bad luck, I've travelled to watch probably more than 100 baseball games in various places and have sat through a couple rain delays, but never had one postponed. Ironically, the only sporting event I didn't get to see was when I took my oldest son to see the Vikings for his 16th birthday and the dome collapsed. 

    You mean much like their defense...and offense against the Eagles?...

     

    Too Soon???

    Pick your poison, night games at 24 degrees or day games, at 32 degrees with sunshine. Pull up a chair on the west side your house this afternoon (provided you are in Minnesota), if you're out of the wind and in the sun, its actually pretty nice.

     

    Are the Twins going to get a higher attendance in the afternoon games in nicer weather or in the evening, even with the kids 'available', when everyone has to dress up in snow suits? Remember, the Twins goal is to get more fannys in the seat so the can sell more $10 beers, $8 hot dogs, and all the other foodie items that are not cheap.

    Without looking at actual game by game attendance data, I’d wager attendance is actually better during the weekday day games. There certainly aren’t going to be many families out until 10:30 on a school night. There’s a reason they call those games “business man’s specials”. I suspect there might be some dealing going on over beers, brats and baseball.

     

    Without looking at actual game by game attendance data, I’d wager attendance is actually better during the weekday day games. There certainly aren’t going to be many families out until 10:30 on a school night. There’s a reason they call those games “business man’s specials”. I suspect there might be some dealing going on over beers, brats and baseball.

    That was my original point, that the Twins would be better off playing day games this time of year because of the warmer temps and sunshine but then someone piped up that 'day games weren't smart while the kids were in school'.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...