Curt Provisional Member Posted June 23, 2012 Posted June 23, 2012 Jeff Passen dissects MLB's blackout policy and reports on a lawsuit challenging it. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/mlb%E2%80%99s-blackout-problem-keeps-sport-in-dark-ages.html
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Interesting. I have no idea what kind of legal ground MLB is on with blackout restrictions but I know I'd love to see it done away with... Not that there aren't workarounds to avoid it in the first place but it's kind of a pain in the ass to do it every time a game is blacked out.
edavis0308 Provisional Member Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Being in Iowa, I am in the blackout zone for the twins, royals, cardinals, brewers, cubs, and white Sox. Which is totally fair. Also, im still trying to figure out why half my MLB network games get blacked out when neither team is even in the Midwest.
edavis0308 Provisional Member Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Oops didn't realize the article talked about Iowa already.
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Being in Iowa, I am in the blackout zone for the twins, royals, cardinals, brewers, cubs, and white Sox. Which is totally fair. Also, im still trying to figure out why half my MLB network games get blacked out when neither team is even in the Midwest.When it comes to the financial powerhouse that is Iowa, it's better safe than sorry. You can't let any of the midwest teams get the upper hand by showing their games to an additional 40 people.
IdahoPilgrim Provisional Member Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Are we sure this will lead to more access? If the RSNs don't have exclusivity, they offer a lower bid for local rights. It then comes down to whether the amount they (MLB clubs) lose collectively is more than or less than what they get from mlb.tv. If it's more than what mlb.tv can provide, they'll just axe the service completely. There is no constitutional right to watch baseball over the internet.
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 24, 2012 Posted June 24, 2012 Are we sure this will lead to more access? If the RSNs don't have exclusivity, they offer a lower bid for local rights. It then comes down to whether the amount they (MLB clubs) lose collectively is more than or less than what they get from mlb.tv. If it's more than what mlb.tv can provide, they'll just axe the service completely. There is no constitutional right to watch baseball over the internet.They wouldn't axe the service. It would be a massive mistake. That's where the future is going and MLBAM is smart enough to know that. They might increase the price or do any number of things but they won't kill the service.
Vahn Lackey Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+ C It took him 14 games to hit his first professional home run with Fort Myers. Tonight, Lackey hit his first MWL homer in his second Kernels at-bat. Explore Vahn Lackey News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.