Bcs4: not quoting your post because ours combined would be gigantic, but here's my response: In this market, Darvish is what helps the most so that's where we differ. Unless we're trading for Strasburg (not available, Archer (possibly available), Duffy (possibly available), DeGrom (not available), Stoman (probably not available), Syndergaard (not available), Ray (not available) etc...there is no better option than Darvish. Archer and Duffy are it. So Darvish, Archer and Duffy or wait until this unknown time where the exact right player is available sometime in the future which could be next year or could be ten years from now. Again, sounds like what they've been doing already...waiting for that "perfect" moment. I think their moment is right now. They may never get another shot at a FA like or better than Darvish ever again. That's reality. It's time to strike. The factor that you are missing is that the Twins were terrible when they signed the majority of the guys you listed (Nolasco, Milone, Correia, Pelfrey and Worley). Who was begging for the Twins to sign those guys? Besides Milone, they had a history of being fifth starters in terms of talent (fourth starters at best). I didn't want to sign the majority of them but what studs were they blocking? Berrios in 2015 or earlier in 2016 is something I wanted, but he was the only stud. If you go with non-studs, then yeah I also would have preferred Wimmers, Duffy, Meyer, May, Gilmartin, Wheeler etc to that group. Who is arguing otherwise? And why are we comparing Darvish to fifth starters as if he is one? If you think that Darvish = Nolasco et al then that explains why you are thinking the way you are. That's the only explanation I can come up with. Because Darvish > all of those combined as far as talent level. Lynn and Cobb and below are more of the Santana, Nolasco, etc level. Darvish is above that tier. Darvish isn't immune to becoming a Nolasco, but he'd have to fall far for that to happen while Cobb/Lynn wouldn't have to fall nearly as far. And to add, I don't mind Cobb as a fallback option if no Darvish, but I don't think Cobb gives this team anywhere near the same boost that Darvish does which is why I'm all about Darvish while he's still available. Darvish would be the clear number one on this staff where Cobb would be the two or three depending on how Santana ages. And Darvish occupies one spot in the rotation. He doesn't block prospects coming up. As it stands now it could be Darvish, Berrios, Santana, Gibson (or a prospect), Mejia (or a prospect). Potentially two open spots for someone to take. There is a spot for Gonsalves or someone else to grab. And Santana and Gibson may not be on the team in 2019 so that makes it Darvish, Berrios and three open spots. I fail to see the problem here and I don't see the point in not trying to better the rotation (waiting). Better rotation equals more wins, unless you're really unlucky. And more wins is a good thing, isn't it?