Squirrel

That'll learn ya.

Yes

Exactly.

Okay, shocking news ... I ate bacon today.

And that is why I don't think I could ever call Buxton a bust. He might not meet expectations, jury's not in on that yet, but that right there you can't call a bust.

That movie gets creepier every time I see it. REDRUM

Geez

My trainer is a White Sox fan but already quit watching them for the season, has moved onto college football. So when I wanted to gloat about Thursday's game, he hadn't even watched, didn't even know the score or who they played. Took the wind right out of my sails.

The issue is that she's not really a White Sox fan ... just being a 33, er 44, groupie.

We used to have a Sox fan on these boards. He was a carry over from BYTO. He posted with us because he couldn't stand the the Sox site. His name was Hawkiconk. Solid baseball fan, good poster when he posted.

Yup. But in the spirit of tempering my hopefulness, I'll see where he's at at the end if the month.

It's not a lot, but I have seen it. I chalk one or two of those into just throwing that out there but really meaning they are disappointed. But, I have seen a few posters say specifically that Buxton is a bust. For me personally, it's too soon to label him that. And I haven't lowered my expectations, per se, but perhaps my hopefulness has been tempered a bit.

Yes. I guess that's kind of a Chief yes, but yes to both. I have seen people refer to him as a bust as well as those who think he's disappointing so far.

I saw that at a game last season between the Cubs and the Nats. At least I think it was the lead off hitters. It was definitely two solo homeruns, one in each half of the first inning.

Well, I might see you there but not know its you I'm seeing.

Me, too ... but without breath-holding

Oh, I've blogged before, but not on baseball, and it was more like journaling than specific subject blogging.

I've been continually editing it so I don't know if I lengthened or shortened it since your post

Too bad you completely missed the point of this.

Or after a night of tequila.

Btw ... the 538 thread was merged with another ... it wasn't deleted.

Dave, you are walking a fine line. I will shut down this thread if you lead it in this direction.

Or .. maybe moving away will strengthen your desire to find a connection to it. That's basically what happened when I moved from MN. In Canada, I sort of didn't really look for any means, but when I moved to Chicago, I did. That's when I started going to the ESPN boards, then to BYTO, then here. I was swallowed up in a sea of White Sox fans and those boards, such as they were, were my islands of survival! (Okay, yeah, I'm being overly dramatic.)

In light of some posting styles we have been seeing lately on TD, I thought I'd do some venting of my own ... in a blog. The thread that broke this camel's back was this thread, 'It is time to end the insanity.' I've been meaning to address this for a while now, and have here and there in threads when posts become nothing more than venting general frustrations rather than addressing the topic at hand; and redundant threads get started on this same topic of frustration that seem more like rants than opening a new thread to discuss the latest news. Okay, okay ... the general topic of 'This is what's wrong with the Twins' is a topic of discussion ... but we've seen this in several threads already. Obviously there are new salient points that must be addressed, but it is this 'venting' and 'ranting' that becomes a detriment to my and others' enjoyment and participation in the forums. I've always thought the purpose of the forums on TD is for discussion, critical discussion. Yes, with disagreements and passion, but, nonetheless, critical discussion, with maybe a little humor and/or snark mixed in from time to time, no matter what side you fall on with any given issue. Posters have always been encouraged to start threads to discuss a particular topic, or general topic, or a news item you saw, or a blog you read, or a question you have, or a move that was made/not made, management issues, player issues etc. And yes, those discussions will get emotional and passionate as we all have a vested interest in the outcome of the Twins, and have our own opinions on what should/should not be, and often disagree on the best way forward. And sometimes threads do get a bit meandering and off topic despite our best efforts to try and keep them within loose boundaries. But this recent posting style, such as the OP, in my opinion, really needs to be directed towards the Blogs area on this site. These threads, such as the one I made example of, serve no purpose other than to regurgitate a list of generalized complaints and are not focussed points of discussion and only invite generalized regurgitating of someone else's complaints. The title of this thread 'End the insanity' in and of itself just opens the floor to everyone's complaints and soon we have a morass of unpleasant vomiting to wade through. Yes, we're frustrated and I'm not trying to take that away from anyone, not in the least, because well, it IS frustrating, to no end, at least for me. And I guess we each have our own way of dealing, but the Blogs are there for you to let it all out. You want to vent? Start a blog and vent away. You want to have a legitimate, critical discussion, stick to the forums and structure a thread that leads to that; a post or a thread that has been thought out and isn't some generalized rant that has no real basis in reality other than it's some emotional response, not a genuine reading of facts, to what you think should have happened. Don't just vomit up all your frustration for the rest of us to wade through; that's just lazy. Those are the types of threads and posts that keep me from the forums, not the stances people may take on the Twins in general or specifically. If you don't like a topic, you are free to not read it. If you don't like a particular poster, put them on ignore or skip over their posts. So I find myself more and more throwing my hands up and 'walking away' because threads just become unreadable the more this style continues. (Edit: I want to add that the thread I used as an example has generated a pretty fair and decent discussion. Many threads and posts of this 'listing of wrongs venting' have not. I'm in no way suggesting we can't be critical of the team and its management ... I mean, come on, look at the team ... I'm suggesting that don't just start a thread or make a post listing all that bothers you. Try to frame things so we can have legitimate discussions without being critical of fellow posters who might have a differing point of view, otherwise, try starting a blog. If you have to end a post or a thread start with '/end rant,' which this one did not, it probably would be better suited for a blog. They are very useful for 'getting it out' of your system. But given the OP of that thread, it was very easy for all of us to think to ourselves, 'Oy, this again?' and either walk away or get defensive or pile on. The following paragraph stands ... for all and everything. Stop the divisive language!) Another issue I want to address: this generalized characterization of posters some of you think necessary to throw into their posts. This 'The Twins can do no wrong crowd' or the 'Twins can do no right crowd' is hugely disrespectful and dismissive, and from this moderator, will not be tolerated. If you want to divide and pick sides, fine, go play a game of dodge ball, your posts will be removed. Lumping posters into such 'all or nothing' categories because they choose to disagree with a point here and there needs to stop. I try to stay fairly objective, as objective as I can in my own like/dislike of certain topics, in my reading here, despite my own frustrations with the team, but there really are only two or three posters that fall into those mentioned categories on each end of this spectrum. The large majority of posters fall everywhere in between. Yes, some have definite leanings, but I have seen very, very few posters who have blindly taken these all or nothing stances on everything Twins. If all you want to do is read posts only in agreement with you, then you are in the wrong place. It is nothing but smug self-righteousness to declare yourself so right and others wrong and then to label others in such a dismissive way. It's the same with the negative/positive crowd. This is nothing but from your perspective, and your perspective is NOT the end all to defining anyone else. Say your piece. Have at it. And if others disagree, so be it. Have a debate, be open-minded to another's views and why they take them, give them the benefit of the doubt, ask for explanations, and disagree if you just disagree, but don't be dismissive about it by saying 'You're just part of that crowd.' If one poster likes a move and another doesn't, they are not in any of the above-mentioned crowds, they just differ in opinions. And if a poster wants to point out a silver lining or a black cloud, so what? It's their opinion and no one is right or wrong here. I'm not sure why that is so difficult to understand. Does it bruise egos when someone doesn't like your point, or picks it apart with their own interpretation of the facts, or their own use (right or wrong) of various metrics, stats, other numbers? Get over it. Don't double down and hunker down so hard you develop tunnel vision, and resort to the "Oh, you just hate so and so" or "Oh, you just love so and so" as an argument. It's unproductive, lazy and weak. And it gets old, and frankly, loses credibility for the poster who uses that as an argument. And maybe, just maybe, we don't need to fight to the end. When it gets to the point of labeling posters, I think it's time to agree to disagree and just let it go. Okay ... I've run out of steam. Whew! That was so cathartic!!! You should give it a try. See what I did there? Here's how I got started and so can you. There are all sorts of things to click on to help you find your way through the blogs. There's even a tutorial ... which I didn't click, because I didn't need to. So ... have at it. 1. On the red menu strip across the top, click on the word “Blogs” 2. Click on the black rectangle that says ‘Create a Blog’ 3. Read the terms and rules, then check the box that says you have read and understood the terms, then click ‘Continue—>’ 4. Fill in the blanks with the Blog name, Blog description, choose blog type, then click continue. Example: Blog Name: ChiTown’s Fun Takes Blog Description: All that frustrates me about the Twins Blog Type: Local Blog 5. Choose your settings 6. Save At that point you can choose ‘Options’ and then ‘Add new entry’ and go to town. Or leave, collect your thoughts, come back and choose ‘Blogs’ from the red menu strip across the top, click ‘Add Entry’ and go to town.

Not a time to unmute