Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Alex

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Alex

  1. To be fair to Ryan, I don't know that there was a great time to sell high on these players, unless you wanted to do so when they were performing well and the Twins were winning, which doesn't seem like a good idea either. The problem with the Doumit extension is that it was early (June - certainly not after a good season) in the first year of the contract and was for two years. This isn't hindsight and a lot of baseball analysts were saying it at the time. We now see the problem with it. He's clogging up the roster, and would be to some extent even if he catches. Just because the money doesn't mean anything doesn't mean it wasn't a bad move.
  2. Probably true to some extent, but I also think it's that they try (tried?) to go for cost efficient pitchers as well and strikeout pitchers often don't fit that. As you point out, since they like control, strikeout pitchers who also have good control are going to be very expensive. The second part of that was they seemed to try and get college pitchers who could help them sooner in the majors rather than later and that may have limited their draft choices when they were picking later in the round.
  3. A player should communicate his health issues and desires to his team. However, you're not wrong that they also need to accept the reality of such concerns. I wonder if we'll start to see contracts that have clauses regarding position played allowed?
  4. As with Mauer, a player needs to do what is right for his health and future. The difference with Doumit is that it might mean he's no longer has much value, and unfortunately doesn't belong on the roster.
  5. Looks like he is headed to the Marlins based on the latest there.
  6. I understand your reason for calling it two different arguments, but I disagree. It's just incredibly selective to say people should somehow applaud the one move he made that was successful (in terms of money) while there were other moves (and lack thereof) that hurt the team.
  7. We can' t have it both ways. We can't give Ryan credit for Correia, who was better than expected (but that topped out at about average) and then not be critical of the fact that he wasn't able to build anything but the worst rotation in baseball. I expected Correia to be worse, so I admit I was wrong. But many of us were correct about the results of the rotation as a whole. Correia was a success, but one in a season of many, many other failures, including a debacle at the CF position.
  8. I added this caveat in a later edit, not as specifically, but I also pointed out that his 2010 numbers were very similar to 2013. 2011 there really wasn't much data. But the point was simply looking at it from RHB/LHB perspective isn't enough to say how Target Field would affect it.
  9. I don't disagree about the OF defense, but giving up HR to RH/LH batters does not tell you where those HR went. Of his 24 HR last season, just six landed in the left field seats. Every other HR was from CF to RF. Now sadly, if you overlay Target Field, supposedly that only takes away one HR. Not sure how accurate that overlay is and it can't take into account the colder weather or other conditions --if there are any -- in Target Field (air currents) that may be more likely keeping balls in the park on that side of the park. And those numbers apply just to last year (2012 was more spread out where 2010 was similar to 2013). http://www.hittrackeronline.com/detail.php?id=2013_2643&type=pitcher
  10. This is exactly why I think the a team should never ignore FA or punt seasons. If Nalasco pitches similar to what he did last year, the Twins are a better team. Add another good FA pitcher and some things go right (like Meyer is up and Gibson pitches better), you suddenly are a very competitive team still with plenty of money to spend.
  11. If you want to argue that essentially one signing means an upgrade that's fine, but acting like re-signing Pelfry would be a component of that upgrade is odd.
  12. Great stuff guys. Very much enjoyed this.
  13. You obviously missed the irony in my post. I agree with you and there are plenty of other examples where Ryan's words don't match the result or effort. Whether that's because he over-promises and underperforms due to circumstances or because it's saying one thing to appease season ticket holders and really planning something different. As others have said, neither is good. Of course, I much appreciated Jeremy and Seth's podcast with Mike Bernadino where they mostly agreed that it doesn't make sense and this could just be a rumor and isn't coming from the Twins camp, so maybe this all didn't happen or is a very preliminary offer.
  14. No. This would not a low risk/"decent" upside signing and is only comparable Liriano on the slimmest of of superficial elements. With Pelfrey, the best you can hope for is average to slightly above average, not unlike Correia. Liriano is the definition of low risk/high upside in that he's had some rough seasons but he's also had dominating ones and his stuff has the potential to have more. This would be a low risk/low upside signing. Which, as people have mentioned is fine if this isn't their top signing, but as many have pointed out, there's no real reason to go with a guy like this in late November/December.
  15. You have to admire Ryan as a man of his word...this is definitely not a short cut. Maybe more worrisome is the possibility in the rumor that they are underwhelming Pelfrey. If he wants and expects more, how are they going to attract better pitchers?
  16. I wish I could go to a different restaurant, like the one they have in St. Louis, but I don't think with the current local management they're going to figure out any short cuts for the cooks get those fries out faster.
  17. While I like Gleeman and often agree with him, I've never appreciated nor worried his condescension for the site, especially when he spent time in the podcast and tweeting last week about one single poster that complained about the G+G podcast. Also ironically and more to the topic, it's funny you mention it as in this week's he would have fit right in this thread. He essentially said the Twins had no reason not to make better offers to three of the four pitchers Brock mentioned that had signed.
  18. I agree that it's a bit early, but I'd love if my favorite team was out in front of and were addressing any of their many needs right away, especially as there are teams that have been doing that.
  19. Well, "consider" is far different from "for sure" and while I haven't run the numbers I think there's still more who would say "no." Either way it's interesting in that Fielder has been a better overall hitter (900+ OPS) for his career than Mauer. As to the last paragraph, it sort of shows that a player who has an unfriendly team contract, good hitter or no, is likely to get a similar player in return.
  20. By some probably, but that's part of the reason I thought it a valid question now, and I wouldn't have even bothered if he was catching,
  21. Here it is again. I'd really appreciate some data or extended study on this as it is becoming a popular narrative. You did couch it at least, saying "early indicators..." but I'd still like to know what people are referencing when they point to this. EDIT: I see that someone did post something in the other thread.
  22. I've seen that people say Target Field is hard on LHB. Can someone point me to data over time, and not just yearly park factors? Target Field has fluctuated each year in terms of overall park factors, and in the last two years they have been above 1.0 for runs scored and even for HR in 2012.
  23. Those are good points about Mauer but there are reasons to be optimistic about his health with a move to first base. RC is a counting stat, so games played is a big factor. Joe was almost two points higher than Fielder in RC/27. If Fielder continues to be healthier, or rather Mauer continues to be unhealthy, then the counting aspect of that stat will become more relevant. However, if Mauer had played closer to 140 games last season he would have outpaced Fielder.
  24. No problem. Thanks for the link. I'd point, out, though, that that list is a list of the highest contracts by players 28 and older, not the 10 worst contracts. He doesn't list the Twins as a team that would redo a contract from that list, but I'm not actually so sure. He he also has a clear bias that he seems to expect FA to be worth what they are paid , but that's nearly impossible with these contracts. Teams are often paying a premium price for a rare, unique talent and demand is driven up by competition. Not that I disagree with his premise overall, that these are very risky contracts but teams certainly hope they're the exception.
  25. In athletes it can be pretty damning, and I am having trouble thinking of severely overweight position players that lasted. As for slump, it was from May to July where he hit below .800 OPS. Then in August he had an .813 OPS and wrapped up Sept and Oct back to form with a .933 OPS. But, overall, I agree with you that it's surprising there haven't been more people willing to commit. I'm not saying I would but with the mentality some have around Mauer and Fielder being a .900+ OPS career hitter and having more power I'm surprised that people wouldn't be willing to take the risk.
×
×
  • Create New...