Jump to content
Help us design a better Twins Daily for you by filling out this user survey, click here! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

jimmer

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,027

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jimmer

  1. jimmer
    The ROTATION had the worst ERA by .20. 5.39 is pathetic. Of course, having the 2nd worst defense in baseball didn't help. By FIP, the worst rotation was the Reds. The Twins and Royals ONLY tied for being the next worse by FIP. But other than that, I too am having issues wrapping my head around the idea this team is about to turn things around because young guys are getting older and the rotation was somehow not as bad as they were. I also wonder about how drastic the difference behind the plate will be, Mostly, the talent just isn't there, IMO. I was saying this towards the end of 2015 and during the offseason before 2016 too.
  2. jimmer
    yeah, I do. I also know that it has continued and the people running the Rays probably didn't just forgeet it all. Could be wrong though.
  3. jimmer
    As a team with a very good track record for identifying and developing starters, Rays GM said of the trade,'The way we have him evaluated and his proximity to the big leagues, it was an opportunity we couldn't pass up as an organization.'
  4. jimmer
    they are both interesting viewpoints.
  5. jimmer
    it was Jeff Sullivan who wrote the first piece, not Zimmerman And in Dave's piece, he said, as he said before, that De Leon is an overpay for Forsythe.
  6. jimmer
    most posters DO realize these things, but they also realize there are only so many ways to get quality pitching. Our draft and development has failed forever, and we wont sign top notch starters (cause, again, price too high except in the case of FA, price is too high in actual money as opposed to a player). So we have to take chances on trading for young pitchers. Especially ones as well regarded as De Leon. If we always on how bad they COULD be and that stops us from trading for them, then we really restrict our ability to improve our rotation. As if we werent already hampered enough by what our team will spend.
  7. jimmer
    I never said I thought the Dodgers were offering three players. I said I thought two players were being offered and the hold up was the third player (meaning either the Dodgers were not offering a 3rd piece at all and the Twins wanted one, or the Dodgers were offering a 3rd player and the Twins didnt like the player). In either of those scenarios, the 2nd piece isnt insignificant and it makes the offer more than De Leon straight up. It doesnt mean the 2nd and 3rd pieces are both insignificant.
  8. jimmer
    I believe Forsythe is a downgrade from Dozier but not a huge one. Dozier should have gotten more in return but not significantly more. I believe we were offered more than De Leon and that the hold up was the third piece, whether that means having a third piece at all or who the third piece was.
  9. jimmer
    Do these words sound familiar? 'when a poster starts to invent positions not taken by others, it is easy for escalation'. Anyway, doesn't make sense to me either. Then again, I never said I believed the Dodgers offered significantly more for Dozier than what they did for Forsythe, just that I believe they offered more (and Jeff Passan's tweet seems to back that up). Additionally, that article about Forsythe and Dozier being very close is just one person's opinion, who knows whether that's the same opinion across the league.
  10. jimmer
    Well, remember, getting Castro was clearly the Twins top priority from the get-go. I thought it should be trading for some quality pitching prospects, but alas.
  11. jimmer
    Nobody said a ton more, but not hard to believe it was De Leon plus another decent prospect, like Calhoun. Passan's tweet seems to suggest a third prospect (or the third prospect) was the issue. So who knows how good the 2nd prospect was, and it was the third prospect that was holding things up. You said, 'Without knowing the specifics of the best offer Minnesota turned down, it is difficult to cast any immediate judgments.' Based on what you wrote after saying that, it didn't seem you found it very difficult to cast an immediate judgment at all Your judgment was clearly that the Twins made the right decision to keep Dozier. Maybe you meant, 'Without knowing the specifics of the best offer Minnesota turned down, it is difficult to say the FO did the wrong thing'?
  12. jimmer
    'At this moment, that looks like the right move. De Leon is a shiny prospect, and exactly the type of player Minnesota needed back as a headliner, but with a 1-to-1 swap and no meaningful auxiliary components the risks are sky-high.' -Yeah, we don't know what the offer was. Assuming it was De Leon and nothing (or nothing significant) just plays into the benefit of the doubt almost always given to the FO (regardless of the names). Find it hard to believe Dodgers offered the same thing for Dozier that they did for Forsythe (basically). 'And the Dodgers, at the end of the day, were willing to deal him straight-up for a player in Forsythe who is a major downgrade from Dozier.' -http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/dodgers-trade-for-brian-dozier-basically/ Major downgrade if Dozier has another year like he did in 2016 or improves. I would bet zero dollars and zero cents either of those things happen.
  13. jimmer
    FTFY :-)
  14. jimmer
    Problem is, once the 5th starter was introduced, it hurt the bench and once the DH was introduced, it hurt the bench in the AL. And that was before teams started using, and expanding, bullpens more.
  15. jimmer
    MLB could expand rosters AND, at the same time, put a limit on the amount of pitchers a team can have on the roster.
  16. jimmer
    Because saves leader?
  17. jimmer
    Beltre wRC+ 115, OPS+ 116, OPS .818. Traditional slash line:.286/.338/.480 Chipper wRC+ 141, OPS+ 141, OPS .930. Traditional slash line: .303/.401/.529 Offensively, Beltre isn't close. But defense should and does count. Chipper about average (maybe slightly below, but not too much below). Beltre, on the other hand, AWESOME on D! And though bWAR has Beltre barely above Chipper, fWAR actually has Chipper higher than Beltre (barely) though I doubt it ends up that way when it's all said and done. P.S. Chipper is also 3rd in HRs for 3Bs.
  18. jimmer
    I think Chipper is an absolute slam dunk HOFer worthy of first ballot entrance, and he'll get it. Never had an amazing year? Well, he has an MVP, had 5 seasons with an OPS over 1.000 (which is more than 25% of his seasons), led the league in OPS+ once, has a batting title, had a season where he had an OBP of .470. Had 10 seasons with an OBP over .400. Had 11 seasons with an OPS over .900 and NEVER had an OPS under .800. Oh, and he wasn't a 1B or a corner OF, he was a 3B. BA of .303, OBP .401, SLG% over .529. 141 OPS+. 18 year career with an OBP over .400? Yes please. Not sure how one can have those career numbers and never have an amazing season. 'Some cool Chipper nuggets: He's one of exactly two switch-hitters in history who hit .300 from both sides of the plate over at least 5,000 plate appearances. (The other: Frankie Frisch.) ... He's also one of two switch-hitters in the .400 OBP-.500 SLG-400 HR Club. (The other: Some guy named Mickey Mantle.) ... He finished with more than 100 more walks than strikeouts. And in the expansion era, only four other players with as many home runs as the Chipster could say that (Bonds, Frank Thomas, Albert Pujols, Gary Sheffield). ... And if we're allowed to mention RBIs, guess who drove in more runs than any player in history whose primary position was third base? Yep. Chipper Jones (1,623).'--Jayson Stark And the WAR argument, for those who care (and many don't). There are 7 retired 3B that are in the top 10 for bWAR at 3B. ALL of them are in the HOF. Beltre (4th), Chipper (6th) and Rolen (10) are the other three in the top 10 and haven't been on a ballot yet.
  19. jimmer
    It's not like Glavine was ever a K machine or a control freak.. -He was at 7K/9 or higher only twice. -He only walked less than 2 per 9 once. -Mussina AVERAGED over 7K and less than 2BB/9 And Mussina had less than 50 PA against pitchers, Glavine had over 1300 PA against pitchers.. Mussina pitched against better offenses and performed better across the board anyway. You want to say the extra innings/years help even out the rate stats, well, the fact that Glavine faced weaker competition than Mussina his whole career put the advantage right back to Mussina. But those 800 more innings is also what got him the 300 wins which was likely another big reason why he gets in first ballot. If Mussina wanted to be a compiler,, he likely only needs another 400 innings to get to 300 wins. And he'd still have about 400 less innings if he had done that.
  20. jimmer
    So Jayson Stark made an interesting comment, 'I'd even argue he was the greatest No. 1 overall draft pick of all time -- considering he played every game of his career for the team that drafted him..' I love Chipper and he is a slam dunk HOFer, but there's a guy named Ken Griffey Jr. Thoughts?
  21. jimmer
    You make it sound like all I put was WAR (calling it a WAR-based analysis like that automatically makes it invalid which I guess for some it does), and I didn't just use WAR. In fact, only one paragraph mentioned WAR. A lot of your argument goes back to the media/popularity argument (no, he didn't deserve 2 CY, only one) and compiler issues I already pointed out. Even without WAR (which you bring up, and discard, twice) I think he's overrated. It's not like I didn't list a bunch of other comparisons, right? FIP, ERA+, K/9, BB/9 NL versus AL, etc. All of which favor Mussina and Schilling. I even mentioned winning % , which I don't care about but thought it should be mentioned because SOME do. Winning % is as far away from WAR as one could get. And I never said Glavine wasn't HOF worthy, just that Schilling and Mussina were better, yet Glavine gets in easily on first shot. That's my issue. He certainly doesn't stack up to the group of Pedro, Clemens, Big Unit and Maddux.
  22. jimmer
    BTW, question abut HOFer IRod. He was an awesome defensive catcher. Has Yadier been even better? I've watched both in their prime and think Yadier might be even better defensively.
  23. jimmer
    'Mussina had nine seasons with an Adjusted ERA+ better than 129. The only perspective you need on what that means is the list I'm about to unfurl. The only five starters since 1900 with more seasons that much better than the league average: Clemens, Walter Johnson, Christy Mathewson, Greg Maddux and Lefty Grove. Check!'--Jayson Stark. Mussina has 82 WAR (that is a ton. That should get you in no matter what team you play on). Schilling 80 WAR. Glavine only 67 WAR (even though he played CONSIDERABLY longer than the other two). Before looking at the comparison below, remember Glavine pitched in the NL (the non-DH league) his whole career, Mussina pitched in the AL East his whole career. Mussina 3.57 FIP, Schilling 3.23 FIP, Glavine 3.95 FIP. Mussina ERA+ of 123 (3562 IP), Schilling ERA+ of 127 (3261 IP), Glavine ERA+ of 118. (4413 IP) Mussina 7.11K, 1.98BB, Schilling 8.60K, 1.96BB, Glavine 5.32K, 3.06BB (and he pitched to a lot of pitchers). For those who care about wins and losses, Mussina had a .638 winning %. Glavine was at .600 and Schilling at .597. I'm not sure what people can look at and say Glavine was a first ballot HOFer while Schilling and Mussina continue to wait, but I sure can't find it. But Glavine gets in first ballot. He was a win accumulator who stuck around a long time to get to 300 wins (which seem to matter but the losses don't). Fortunate to be on great teams with great teammates in the rotation, 'Big Three'. The writers pushed the Big Three narrative and they rewarded themselves, and Glavine, because of it.
  24. jimmer
    One of those guys is not like the others.
  25. jimmer
    I'm going to stand by what I wrote in the post you quoted 100%. You may not like my take on what happened or my opinion on it, but its not disingenuous. That word gets thrown around here a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...