Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

jimmer

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,027

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jimmer

  1. jimmer
    Thanks for the info and nice WAR comp, do you know fWAR's same comparison? And Carew's
  2. jimmer
    A lot of people want to make sure it's perfect context (which is pretty much impossible to attain) only in so much as it hurts Mauer's case. Now we can wonder how close it would have been if those guys also had to play catcher.
  3. jimmer
    Where was Gwynn's and Boggs (corner IF and corner OF)?
  4. jimmer
    I think you are still missing the point. Maybe go back and read the discussion between Chief and I. We were just talking about the career slashline Mauer has. IMO, the slashline itself is awesome. I said if Joe can have his career slashline this year, that will be awesome. Or not, depending on point of view. He said that slashline isn't awesome. So I brought up similiar type HOF hitters who had those slashlines and still managed to be HOFers. Players most consider awesome players. Except Joe, apparently.
  5. jimmer
    We also might want to take into account Mauer did it while enduring the rigors of playing catcher while Carew, Oliva, Boggs and Gwynn didn't have to do that. In any event, thse guys were brought up because I talked about how if Joe could get back to being Joe with his career slashline that'd be awesome Joe. Then it was pointed out his slashline isn't awesome. So these HOF players (minus Oliva) were mentioned. Similar type of slashlines. Similar types of hitters.
  6. jimmer
    I think Dozier is the best 2B in the division.
  7. jimmer
    Chief and I were talking about Mauer's career slashline and how that's apparently not awesome. His career slashline is better than Carew's and Gwynn's. And we can add Boggs in there too. All these hitters were hitters like Mauer. And none of them had to do this while enduring the rigors of the catcher position.
  8. jimmer
    If 2009 Joe is what you need to see to say he's awesome then yes, he won't be awesome. That's easy. He was that guy once, which really means he's never been that guy in reality because extreme outliers don't give us a realistic view of what a player's level is. Tony Gwynn is going to be disappointed you don't think he had an awesome career. Carew too. Oh, and neither of them had to play catcher for around half their career while doing it.
  9. jimmer
    A better hitter than the guy who has won 3 batting titles and has a career line of .319/.401/.459. Our standards are pretty high for this guy. I think if he decides to force the issue in order to appease the masses he'll be a worse hitter. I'd rather let Joe be Joe. A healthy Joe is an awesome Joe.
  10. jimmer
    It says there are a lot of players in your league I'd like to play fantasy baseball with or that your league is small or the format is bad. Or that your players are easily spooked by one bad year. Most fantasy baseball leagues don't count defense other than errors. Many fantasy leagues will think Howard is better than Mauer. He's not. Fantasy Baseball formats often doesn't reflect reality on who is an overall good ballplayer and who isn't. Someone decides what stats deserve the most points which ones deserve too little, which ones don't have any value at all. Most go by the most traditional stats possible. Whether or not he's drafted or not by some fantasy players doesn't really tell us anything about what he'll do.
  11. jimmer
    Mauer seems to get pitched outside...a lot. If that continues, I hope he doesn't still try and pull the ball or we're going to continue to see an uptick in 4-3 putouts. or 4-6-3 DPs. Seems that's what he was trying to do last year as well.
  12. jimmer
    Have faith man, the Twins FO is doing everything right and there's always a way to justify that's the case. So sit back and enjoy the show. I mean, if you like 5 season repeats.
  13. jimmer
    I expect his slash line right near his career slash line and a wRC+ in the 130s at minimum. Wouldn't be surprised if it was in the 140s. And since this division just happens to have two beasts at 1B in Abreu and Cabrera, that puts him third in the division at 1B, but still top 10 in the majors.
  14. jimmer
    Mauer is another year removed from concussion. He's had one bad year in the last three years and that was last year, and that was after a concussion ended his 2013. And he's only had one other bad year in his career and that was 2011 when he played 1/2 a season.
  15. jimmer
    Three years? His 2013 was very good until the concussion (which is out of his control), his 2012 was also very good. So not sure what you were hoping for or how you think he hadn't rebounded. The people telling you he'd rebound must not have known his mean either. 2014 was an off year for him for sure, but he was showing good signs in the 2nd half as he gets further from his concussion.
  16. jimmer
    That report came out in 2011 I believe. I mentioned it earlier and posted a quote from the article.
  17. jimmer
    Mauer looks like he's in good shape to me. Then again, I have HDTV. Mauer, when healthy, makes in impact. Whether he does it the way some feel a 1B should or not is, sadly, debatable. Bulking up doesn't necessarily mean anyone is going to make 'an impact' more than if he didn't bulking up. It's about bat speed, torque, getting the barrel of the bat on the ball, knowing what kind of batter you are, etc.
  18. jimmer
    Yeah he is. Almost as old as our starting RF. Oh wait, I guess they are exactly the same age for a few months.
  19. jimmer
    A position battle. A position competition. Those phrases suggest that it's in the player's hands to perform and may the best players win. Problem is, and as you point out when you say a lot of things go into these decisions (as we all know, BTW), that's not the case. So maybe they should stop saying that, is my point (and that goes for most if not all teams). They should stop trying to sell that to the fans and players. The rest of what you're saying has nothing to do with my point. I wasn't asking why those guys didn't make it? I didn't think any of them would make it from the very beginning. I said so. But I kept being told there was competition. I guess because the FO said there was. Sano could make it, Meyer could make it. May could make it, look Rosario might too. Then when they didn't it's 'well, clearly they weren't ready'. None of the moves back to the minors surprised me. Span was doing the best in the three player battle for CF (Gomez, Pride, Span) when Gomez was named the winner and Pridie was gone quick in ST and never got a start in CF. Slowey had the best numbers of all 6 pitchers in competition for the 5 spots, he went to the pen. Who had the best ERA of all the guys up for the 5th spot this year? Were all these decisions wrong? Who knows. Could they all have been right, could be. But we're talking about the players and fans being told about a competition.
  20. jimmer
    Pohalds just saw the value of their team jump by almost 50% in one offseason, didn't they?
  21. jimmer
    yeah, but NEXT year.
  22. jimmer
    I couldn't disagree more about the Twins being a good ball club. They aren't as currently constructed at the MLB level.
  23. jimmer
    Not to mention one (Gomez) didn't even make his MLB debut with us :-) And the names brought up earlier (Santana, Hicks, Vargas, Gibson) were brought up as examples of people who were fast-tracked. So if THAT is what we call fast-tracking.
  24. jimmer
    You think so? How many of those guys mentioned were 21/22 when they debuted? The years in the minors I gave weren't from when they were signed, it's from when they debuted on the field. Most started at 17/18. I'm not sure I'd call it fast for all those guys. Some of those guys spent 2-3+ years in rookie ball alone.
  25. jimmer
    How many years in the minors constitutes fast tracking? Slow tracking? Normal tracking? Before getting promoted to MLB: Vargas 6 years in the minors. Hicks 5. Danny Santana 7. Arcia 5. Rosario 5 years and still not promoted (though there's been some suspensions). Are we going to call this fast-tracking? Study came out a couple years ago that stated the Twins were the slowest to promote their players of all MLB teams. 'The result is that some teams develop a reputation for especially aggressive or conservative tendencies in promoting their players. When I asked Kevin Goldstein to name an organization known for being conservative in this respect, he immediately mentioned the Twins, confirming my own impression.' If that trend is changing, may take awhile to break the perception.
×
×
  • Create New...