To be clear, most of the moderators are split on the pro-anti crowd just as most of the board is. If you are curious about me, I wanted Gardy let go this offseason. I was of the opinion that Ryan needed to hang around for another year or two as he is the right guy to do a rebuild and then it would be his time to go due to his refusal to do the FA thing (though this offseason has changed that with me). I don't care for the Pohlads, hate Bud Selig, and can see both sides of the argument on the FA spending/lack thereof debate. I've moderated individuals on both sides of the debate, most of which has had to do with posters refusing to make their arguments in a respectful manner. There's no reason why anyone would need to refer to Selig as "Pud Selig", Ryan as "Curly", Gardy as "that fat garden gnome", or the GB Packers as "peckers", and while some of these might be funny, and I might share that disdain, I don't think it's unreasonble for the admins and site owners to expect people to be able to voice their opinion in a way that doesn't make them come across as childish and immature. I get the humor aspect of things, and I agree that this is where the line gets muddied. Dave's post is a good example of that. Bottom line though. This is their site. It isn't my site, it's theirs. If the guys that run this site want people to behave in this manner, then so be it.