My two cents: I somewhat understand the redskin comments, since it does hit on skin color, but the name Indians or Braves doesn't bother me. I'm not aware (and someone can correct that) of those terms being used as racial terms in the same way as words like cracker, spic, the N word, etc. Indian is simply a name for a group of people. Calling Indians 'braves' was a compliment unlike another word that was used (savages). Perhaps I'm not up on my racial terms, but I don't see what is derogatory with only that name. Like someone else said, do we abolish Vikings next? That's a slippery slope that at one point would have most team names changed. Blake is right about that, at some point people need to get over being offended so easily. Perhaps my understanding of those terms is wrong, and if that is the case, I'd like to be corrected. But without question, political correctness can go too far, and I think this is a good example. I do think Cleveland should simply continue on phasing out wahoo. They've already been reducing it's prominence in their marketing, but it would be wise to slowly phase in a new logo that doesn't focus on the color of skin. Instead, they could focus on non-racial characteristics of Indians. I would think there would be a way to keep the name without disparaging the people.