It's really not as simple as you make is seem - there's a balance between floor/ceiling, projectability, injury risk etc. The harsh reality is that the Twins have taken a high risk position on drafting pitchers since 2008 and it hasn't done well for them. Gibson and Logan Darnell are the only major leaguers and Stewart is the only bigtime prospect (I loved the pick). It's harder to draft top talent when picking in the 20s and later and maybe the old Twins had a better idea in grabbing "safe" picks like Slowey, Baker, Duensing, Swarzak, Crain, Blackburn etc in later rounds and taking the Garza that falls in your lap. I think you also overestimate how many true #1s may be in a draft. The three big arms at the top won't be there at #5 and not all of them even project as true #1s. http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/8/7/3226335/defining-1-2-3-4-5-starters According to mlbpipeline, Nola has two plus pitches to go with plus control (Freeland, too). Both would have #2 ceilings if they reach it. Mlbpipeline, which is Mayo and Callis, rank Nola #5 in this draft, ahead of Gordon. So Nola isn't another Wimmers. I admit that control is bigger for me than others. A guy like Beede, for instance, terrifies me.