Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36,728

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. USAFChief
    My guess would be if he moves off third for the entire season, that will end his third base career.
  2. USAFChief
    My guess is TR was being honest when he said he wanted to add, not subtract. He feels the Twins are better with Plouffe at third and Sano in right. Hence, he wasn't shopped. I think people are going to extraordinary lengths to find convoluted reasons for something that is simple and has been stated by the GM.
  3. USAFChief
    He "showed" his work: "every indication from the club," and a lack of traffic from "rumor hounds." Now, that's not definitive, but that was the evidence cited. Often, trades do come out of nowhere, but perhaps just as often, there's speculation on sites like MLBTradeRumors for days or weeks before a trade happens. So I think it's fair for someone to take a lack of such speculation, coupled with statements from the club, as an indication. Fair to disagree, as well, but certainly not reason to attack another poster for his interpretation.
  4. USAFChief
    And I look back fondly on my four years at Willmar State Junior College.
  5. USAFChief
    Wow, I must admit, I didn't even know Yale offered such a thing.
  6. USAFChief
    Good post bird. If I could add a perspective from the "spend!" side: something that also gets ignored, from the "don't tie up future payroll" side, is that money unspent today, is just as wasted tomorrow as money that's already spent. Not pending in 2014 is an opportunity that is gone, and we can be reasonably sure it won't be put in an account and spent in 2018. So there's cost to both methods. Either way, you're tieing someone's hands, sometime.
  7. USAFChief
    My guess is, barring an injury, Park is the DH for April and most of May, no matter what. The Twins didn't win the bid and sign him to a deal to send him to Rochester. The job is his for at least six weeks, and will have to be lost, not won.
  8. USAFChief
    Also seeing as the last time they actually experienced success, they did so with FA stars on the team.
  9. USAFChief
    Please explain why you won't be here in 2018, posting that "signing fee agent X sounds good NOW, but has consequences for the future." The exact same rationale will exist then, no? On the article...Sorry, but to me, this is nothing but a long, well organized excuse. "There was no need to spend money in 2011, we thought we were good. No need to spend money in 2011-2014, we sucked. No way to know beforehand we wouldn't suck in 2015. And BP says we'll suck in 2016. Wait for 2018. Of course, in 2018 it'll represent a bad investment, because 2022."
  10. USAFChief
    Nice work Nick!
  11. USAFChief
    Nice work, Seth!
  12. USAFChief
    It would be pretty cool, IMO, if the Twins were to approach 200 team HRs. Chiefs dig the long ball.
  13. USAFChief
    Now we've gone from Nick hoping for 200 to you predicting 376. People need to be realistic, ferpetesakes.
  14. USAFChief
    I think that slash line is reasonable for Park, but 170 HR seems a bit optimistic.
  15. USAFChief
    From: USAFChief Since moving to Tucson, I've had one foot in a freezer during winter months, and the other foot in a bucket of boiling oil during the summer months. On average, I should have been very comfortable year round.
  16. USAFChief
    The basis of that premise is in the first sentence of your cited article: "In baseball, teams have little control over the clustering of hits." That sounds to me like an unsupported theory, rather than proven fact. I'd go so far as to say those who assert such a thing should provide some level of proof, rather than asking us to take on faith that results which do not line up with their theory are due to things that are not controllable. Not to mention, if this actually is a "thing"--if a month-long run of "cluster luck" is enough to throw off the projection system for multiple teams, every year--the projection system is, by definition, useless.
  17. USAFChief
    Has anyone actually taken the time to figure out if the Twins got crazy lucky with chaining together hits early in the season? Or is "sequencing" just the latest buzzword used to explain away results that don't jive with theory?
  18. USAFChief
    The floor for any minor leaguer is "minor leaguer."
  19. USAFChief
    If only a few franchises have the means to assemble the roster to consistently pursue a WS title, how are the Twins to "assemble a consistently good roster"? One good enough, for long enough, that from time to time the cards fall right? You seem to be arguing against yourself. I actually agree with you, by the way. I too want to assemble a roster good enough to win a WS. I just don't think that happens by punting years, and positions. Try to win now, AND next year. Every year. That wouldn't hurt Buxton at all.
  20. USAFChief
    Only one poster in this thread has called winning the WS the only measure of success. And it's not Mike. //sorry, Mike, perhaps I shouldn't speak for you//
  21. USAFChief
    If Toronto was a failure, then Terry Ryan has never had a single successful season as a GM.
  22. USAFChief
    My guess: the Twins are healthy through camp and start the season with Milone and Nolasco in the rotation, Duffey in a long relief role in the pen, and Berrios in Rochester. I could possibly see Nolasco and Duffey switch roles, but I think the most likely scenario is the one above.
  23. USAFChief
    Not even worth money? What would a couple more wins have been worth last year? I'd be fine with sending Buxton to AAA, and letting him force his way past a good player into the Twins lineup. I'd be fine with Buxton starting in Minnesota if the judgement is he's better than anything they could get. What I have a problem with is doing neither.
  24. USAFChief
    I think you're confusing me with another poster...one who advocates, for example, keeping Buxton in AAA, so as not to potentially hurt his long term development, while doing little to nothing about THIS team. I'm the guy who would put Buxton in CF, and let him develop-- maybe even sink or swim--but do my best to surround him with the talent to win now. Let the future take care of itself. If Buxton/Sano/Berrios don't lead us to the promised land in 2019, at least I haven't wasted another 3 years finding that out. If I have the choice to win now, and perhaps tomorrow, I take that every time over losing now, in hopes I MIGHT perhaps win tomorrow.
  25. USAFChief
    I have a hard time holding KC up as a model for "long term success." They went a couple decades without making the postseason, all the while building for the long term success you seek. And it was only after they traded their best minor league asset did they actually achieve said success.
×
×
  • Create New...