1. I must have missed it...where did "7 wins" come from? 2. "Imagined injustice"? Did I imagine the sac bunts called for by Molitor? 3. The Twins played 10 interleague games in NL parks this year (interleague home games are irrelevant to the discussion--pitchers don't bat). 1/16 of the schedule. "Significant" is open for interpretation, but IMO that is not a "significant" portion of the schedule. 4. In the specific case of the Twins, their pitchers had only 2 successful sac bunts in 2016, and I doubt anyone here is complaining too loudly about those (although in my case, unless there's 2 on and no out, I would even be reluctant about having a pitcher sacrifice, unless I knew him to be close to incapable of putting the ball in play.) 5. Looking only at successful sacrifice bunts ignores both the good (the occasional base hit or fielding error on a sac attempt), and the bad (force play at 3rd or 2nd instead of advancing the runner(s), an out with no advance, or as often happens, a combination of called strikes and fouled bunt attempts puts the hitter in a 2 strike hole from which he never recovers.) I submit to you the bad happens more than the good, although I have no numbers to back that up,and combined with the limited value of successful sac bunts, makes the entire strategy pretty cost ineffective. Particularly in the case of a team like the Twins, possessed of a pitching staff that makes playing for one run early in a game the definition of penny wise and pound foolish.