How is a MLB manager influencing their performance?
Is this a serious question??
Just in case:
Who sets the lineup? Makes substitutions? Makes pitching decisions?
Who sets priorities? Provides means and strategies to achieve them? Rewards positive behaviors and punishes poor ones? Who establishes what a team works on and prioritizes from February to October?
Who decides if infeld/outfield is taken, DAILY? Determines cutoff rotation strategies and ensures every member of the team understands and follows them? Who determines what remedial actions are necessary when those rotation strategies dont haooen? Who decides to bring the infield in in the second inning? Have his pitcher forego the slide step, his catcher stay on one knee, and NEVER EVER pitch out even in obvious stealing situations?
Who decides batting practice is required, or leaves it up to players?
Who decides if it's ok to jog to 1st on ground balls and pop-ups?
I can go on and on but you already know all this. You're just not willing to admit these, and many other things, fall on the manager.
And the results are quite apparent. They've been apparent for some time--a long tims--even if full impact has been masked by playing in the ALC.
Fire his ass.
People lose their jobs for poor performance all the time, in all walks of life. Rocco is nothing special, deserving of his job just because someone gave it to him, or because he said hi to you once in Ft Myers.
Baseball managers have been getting fired for 150 years. This is a zero sum business. For every loss, someone wins. And that's the ultimate job performance metric.