Actually, trading Santana seems like a TR move. Trade him without doing anything to address the hole it causes. Sign a washed-up player to replace Santana who is worth about 50 cents and act like it was a successful move when the player performs at a 55 cent level. Meanwhile the other teams will use that $1 player like Santana, who sure might perform at the 90 cent level instead, and beat the Twins with their 55 cent players every day of the week. If the Twins actually could solve a logjam at SP by trading Santana, then sure let him go. But the Twins will still have Hughes, so they will be keeping the worse option. Also, there are no young players ready to step in for Santana. It was mentioned by someone that the A's found success by trading older players for younger ones. Sure, but they were SMART about it. When the A's were good at this, they didn't create holes by their trades. They had someone ready to step in. They traded for others who could fulfill the role. Who the heck are the Twins going to trade Santana for that would not be a net loss to the team? The team's holes are too cavernous for this trade to fix.