Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,376

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Nice humble brag, btw. edit: ninja'd
  2. Mike Sixel
    My wife and I are doing the home show in a few weeks. We are going with 5+5 as a promotion: 5% off, and 5% to charity. I think. We were drinking while discussing that..... edit: I always wonder, if I do change my mind, and run for office, will this kind of joke hurt me from getting that 3rd vote (besides me and my wife)?
  3. Mike Sixel
    long term? shopify. How many times do I need to type that. Or nvidia (only made 240% on it last year.....). Or MSFT. Or AMZN. But, the next three years could be bumpy for any tech stock. You'll need a strong stomach. If the 20% tax on mexico is real, I need to see how much GM uses Mexican plants!
  4. Mike Sixel
    given the double posts, it looks like you already started! Nope, if I was buying a liquor store, it wouldn't be in Oregon. Prices are regulated, and other stuff. They are open on sunday though, so that's nice....
  5. Mike Sixel
    i'm just responding to the above.....that they have plenty of prospects in AA/AAA, and only really need an ace.....and, I clearly said FA, didn't I?
  6. Mike Sixel
    I also wonder, if the SP can be fixed with the current system and 1 FA, and the offense is "set", why was Ryan fired?
  7. Mike Sixel
    Only if there is demand.
  8. Mike Sixel
    Dan San is on our's*....doesn't mean anything until April. *I think he's on the Twins', no idea, frankly.
  9. Mike Sixel
    IMO, not inspiring.....unless they commit to these guys being as RPs....
  10. Mike Sixel
    Of course 2017 matters, that's not how I read your post at all. And, I truly believe the Rays might keep JDL down longer than expected, to slow his service clock. They aren't winning much this year.....
  11. Mike Sixel
    Beer and wine, but that's about the same * *not really, we bought a business last year, paying off some debt
  12. Mike Sixel
    couldn't disagree more. De Leon is about 2018 and beyond, not 2017. the Rays might hold him back, to, you know, not start his clock this year, for example....or to slow his clock. Judging a trade about a SP prospect in year 1 seems all kind of wrong. All kind of wrong. And, frankly, what dozier does this year, unless he hits like Bonds and draws hundreds of thousands of fans, is probably meaningless in the context of the Twins being good in 2018 and beyond....
  13. Mike Sixel
    I don't agree I'm losing in the long run. You have no idea what I did with that cash. Seriously.
  14. Mike Sixel
    I still think 90 or so is about right, maybe 87. In that range. But, you can see how they lose 100 again, I just don't feel that is likely.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Thank you. I've been trying to figure out an analogy that helps with understanding the context of the decision is as, or more, important, than the actual value discussion. I also like, for those that think anyone offered in a trade must not actually be a good prospect: When you go into the grocery store, do you assume all the produce is rotten, because they are willing to sell it, rather than eat it? Though, I don't think it works as well....the point being, players are assets, and you need to best use those assets. Some days, keeping them is the best use. Some days, trading them is the best use, even if the trade is not totally fair....
  16. Mike Sixel
    That last line isn't true. I needed cash this month. I had stock that I felt was going to go up. I still sold it, because I needed cash. Decisions about assets are made in context, not in a vacuum. Arguing that Dozier should not be sold for 80 cents on the dollar, w/o taking into account the context of the entire system and Dozier's contract is, imo, a mistake. (and, I am not arguing you are stating otherwise, btw). It's like an NFL team that has three starting caliber QBs, but the worst OL in football. Keeping the three QBs because the offers aren't "fair" isn't going to lead to many wins, because sports are team events.
  17. Mike Sixel
    thank you for answering. I have my doubts about 2018, but I am not w/o hope. So many of their hitters can't actually hit, that scares me. Can they get better? Sure. Will they? I hope so. As for the pitching and the manager, sigh.
  18. Mike Sixel
    Sorry....how many losing years should we expect in a rebuild? And, when did they start?
  19. Mike Sixel
    better faster than the old one, that should have been clear to someone that wasn't making assumptions about my intentions. criminy.
  20. Mike Sixel
    I didn't say it was business as usual, I pointed out that in the past, and so far now, they have not traded veterans for good prospects. I never once said that the new FO was the same old same old, you inferred that from something I never even implied. One can be disappointed in the Twins, and hopeful that the new FO moves better/faster. At least I can.
  21. Mike Sixel
    ok...how many losing years should I expect in a typical rebuild? I mean, if it isn't unusual? No idea why the Twins didn't start sooner, that has been one of my criticisms of the past GM....
  22. Mike Sixel
    As a fan, I don't really care......the Twins have failed. I am hopeful the new regime is better. But, they have two real assets, and both look very likely to start the season in MN. that might work out, it might not. I was talking about the rebuild, not just this FO......clearly I am not holding it against this FO what happened before, and to imply otherwise, sigh. I am holding it against the Twins though....
  23. Mike Sixel
    the Astros looked a lot smarter before the rebuild kicked in, imo.....
  24. Mike Sixel
    If they aren't, the team is doomed anyway, probably.
  25. Mike Sixel
    Well, Mark Appel was pretty much done by the time he was traded, let's hope they Twins don't do that.... It is an interesting list, but you can see quite a few where there were multiple people in the trades.
×
×
  • Create New...