Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. They will protect Kepler, if for no other reason than great trade bait. There are plenty of guys ahead of him they could unprotect and it would not matter.
  2. Love the game theory post.....not sure i agree with your conclusion, but it is a good post.
  3. It is interesting how few trades are happening. Personally, I think teams are now over valuing cheap prospects. There is great value in the present, the known, and I bbelieve that MLB teams are putting too much stock in an unknown future. A team like Pittsburgh should be dealing .....not their two stud pitchers, but other prospects, IMO.
  4. I don't know....did they wait until Nathan and Perkins were out of options? At some point, you need to get years of value from a player.....and then trade him just before he loses value....
  5. I'd give him all of next year to be a starter. If not, then I'd probably go to high leverage reliever.
  6. I've already paid the money, that's the point of "sunk cost". The money is already gone, the question is....how do I best use that money? do I pay Justin to play here, or do I pay Justin to play someplace else and get a minor league player in return. Either way, the money is spent. Sunk cost, it's a concept even senior executives in huge companies struggle with. Decades of business school training still hasn't fixed their understanding well enough.
  7. Not sure John, but if people think signing a 31 year old is a bad idea, that would suggest starting earlier would be better..... I doubt anyone has given up on him, but it is a bummer he has not progressed as much as we all thought he might this year. He clearly has some very good to great stuff, I remain hopeful.
  8. If healthy, I would push for AAA next year. I have no idea what the twins will do.
  9. Pay Justin, and get nothing at the end of hte year (other than his services in a lost year), or pay Justin's salary, and get a lottery ticket prospect. For a team looking at 85-90+ losses, for a third year in a row, I'm not sure how that's even two choices....
  10. Love this post.
  11. If we knew this is why it happened, it would really bum me out about the future of this team....but we will likely never know why it happens the way it happens, however that is.
  12. So, he's the Ben Revere of infielders, hitting wise? Is that how I should read this?
  13. Great post.....interesting that you say the FA class is worse, as a lot of people said it was better, and that's why Ryan waited (among other reasons). I tend to agree, they will have 7 or so MLB/AAAA arms in house, they have May and Meyer they need to get up here soon.....not to mention other names that they might think will take a leap. That leads me to believe they will not sign pitchers to long term deals that might block those players. That leads me to believe they won't sign a good FA, because good FAs get long term deals (like it or not, they do). That means, I think your list is reasonable, with maybe a guy like they signed this year thrown in. That seems like a logical argument, conclusion, based on available information.
  14. agreed with drjim....aggressive, but not impossible.
  15. Well,if you want to sell tickets next year, you might want to call him up. I do not care about the many. They are rolling in money.
  16. Cynical, silly negative.....blah, blah, balh. How about we discuss the topic, and not each other with labels?
  17. mhfesq....hope you are right, but we all thought there was no way the starting pitching could be worse this year than last....nice 3rd post, btw.
  18. If they do sign guys, I hope they are more Cubs like in their success at then turning them into good prospects.....
  19. How'd that work out? Worst starting staff in baseball. Not sure how we can predict a worse case scenario than that, can we?
  20. The Twins are pretty close to median in terms of runs allowed.....they aren't even close to median in runs scored. They are much closer to the leader in runs allowed than runs scored. I don't think people realize just how bad the offense is this year. Even adding 1 good starter would really help this team. More importantly, they can't have the Hicks / Floriman / Morneau /Plouffe / Doumit tandem in the lineup every day and expect to score runs.
  21. I'm not sure about it......I think one of Deduno/Albers will collapse, and there will be a spot for a FA. Whether they sign one we like or not, hard to say with certainty, but the past does not lead me to believe the future will be better, especially if they think May / Meyer are close, because they "won't want to block them" with long term deals for others.
  22. This is pretty much what the board predicted.....not sure they are "better than expected". Gardy isn't going anywhere, these are the Twins afterall.
  23. Not sure your point puck....,I am not happy he is likely a 5 or worse, but it is what it is. No one is minimizing how bad the staff is. That was not the question.
  24. That wasn't aimed at you, Dave....
×
×
  • Create New...