Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I don't see how "playoff experience" in AAA is better at seeing what he can do in the majors than actually being in the majors. But, I am genuinely curious about how it could help him.
  2. Not a fan of this idea.
  3. Back to minivans.....why are they unmanly? We used ours to camp all over the place. We used ours to bike and golf all,over the place. Unlike most SUVs, our wheels did not get in the way of loading drywall flat so we could remodel. Oh, and they are easy to get stuff into that is big or awkward.
  4. drjim, your argument has merit, but then you really need to expand things. What about defenders that are awesome, but can't hit at all? And so never play. Should they be in the calculation somehow? I think people are over thinking this. This is not a measure used to keep airplanes in the air. It is a measure that attempts to quantify the relative value a player contributed (not will contribute, but did contribute) to their team. I guess if you just take it as an indicator of value, I don't understand how it isn't that. Are the stats less than perfect? yes. Are they so imperfect that they actually mislead us in terms of direction? I don't think so.
  5. totally makes sense that the minor league playoffs are more important than seeing what he can do at the MLB level.....
  6. But they did not play LF......how would you know how good they are in the OF? Why complicate this wi th hypotheticals? People don't like defensive measures, and now we should add hypothetical outcomes?
  7. Why can't a guy be a terrible 3B, but an excellent OFer? I don't get that argument at all. So, player X is a great OF, but you are sure he'd be a better SS or C? I'm confused by this argument.
  8. Read this, and comment, please: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/so-lets-talk-about-alex-gordon/
  9. Should never have been sent down, imo.
  10. People think he is dumb? I think people think he makes some bad decisions, but do people really think he is dumb?
  11. So, counting the negative WAR from the Revree trade........ Scouts that love May think he can learn to throw strikes. Other scouts say they doubt iit and he is a reliever at best. It would be nice if the first group was right. One heck of a trade so far...... On the lighter side, um, I got nothing. Have fun everyone, I am pretty sure I am turning in early.....
  12. I would hardy say they threw money at the problem in a meaningful way. Adding one or two players can't fix these holes. They need to add more for any addition to matter.
  13. the pitching has given up the same number of runs, but is better? I am no mathematician, but that seems suspicious.....
  14. I also am not "bothered" by it......but I found it tacky I guess. I don't know why......as I expect everyone out there to be trying to make money. Maybe disappointed is a better word.
  15. Raining pretty good here now....
  16. I agree with all of that, except one part. The offensive numbers also are skewed by things out of control of the hitter, but people seem to dismiss luck and other things on d, without acknowledging the luck in o. But we agree completely that UZR is not precise. I think everyone that is serious about stats agrees with that.
  17. But many of those guys have been on the team for months, and this is the record.......I have hope, but it isn't like the results are all that encouraging. They should be better than last year, but that's not much of an accomplishment. Some days I look at the team, and feel hope. Other days I look, and I see the same bad, awful, base running and defense and record. Really not sure what to think. And, it doesn't look much better to start next year, with no Sano or Buxton....at the beginning of the year at least.
  18. Right, WAR describes what did happen. I'm not sure I get the "what it is" argument. It is a measure that attempts to value players on offense and defense. Are people using it for something else? Lots of people seem to dwell on things other than "we think this guy is better than this other guy" based on offensive and defensive measures that are the best we have available to us today. I would ask, again, what is a better measure? Should we just throw out defense entirely, or should we take UZR and other measures are directional?
  19. Ya, I live about 10 miles away, not sure why they are delaying the game......radar shows nothing much either.
  20. Or maybe we have all under rated the delta between great corner OF defense and bad corner OF defense all these years....or maybe not. WAR is an indicator, until we have something better. I still do not understand what would be better? Should we ignore defense all together?
  21. My favorite part of this is the belief that people that watch a few games know more about defensive value than people that watch every single play, chart every play, analyze every play, and score every play. The defensive stats are not precise, but they are better than any other option we have. WAR is cumulative, and backward looking........
  22. 2017? Why bother every buying a ticket for this team then? If it takes three more years, this franchise can kiss its ticket base goodbye.
  23. Number 1 sounds a lot like Mauer......or any other catcher until he gets hit in the head or whatever wrong.
  24. I will say this, if they don't believe in him at catcher, I bet another club does, and he should be traded. But.....I bet they'd be wrong if they did.
×
×
  • Create New...