Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. it is one of my favorite parts, yes. I should have mentioned that. And, sorry I said Moses earlier, my bad.
  2. Thanks, thanks a lot, nick.....sigh.
  3. Other than money......I don't get how a proven MLB is more risky than a draft pick that has never played in the majors. I am responding to this from Seth: I think any free agent signing is risky and probably won't end well, so I woudln't go out and get an established one. Isn't a draft pick risky, and super LIKELY not to end well? As for the question, do they NEED and ACE? No, but as constructed on offense and defense right now, an ACE would help this team a lot. This is not the Blue Jays offense, or the Royals defense or bullpen...... I see a zero percent chance an ace signs here as a FA this year. So either Berrios becomes one, or they trade for one, or they don't have one again for many years....
  4. Teams aren't stupid......really, all this cloak and dagger stuff is silliness, either on their part, or ours. No one buys this is PR stuff, or if they do, then it provides no leverage. Really......this is as bad as "sell low"......
  5. I fail to see how making him a RF is a bad thing, if he can do it.......I also fail to see how making him a 1B is a bad thing, as they SLOWLY move Mauer out of the lineup. I remain surprised he didn't play any OF in the minors, frankly.
  6. And some of us were ridiculed over this.......
  7. Actually, nearly every FA offered a QO gets signed......so it isn't true that teams don't give up draft picks for these guys. I can recall 2-3 in the last 5-10 years that weren't. That's it.
  8. thanks, doesn't help his argument, but at least it's more clear to me now.
  9. Guys are peaking earlier because (most) teams have realized that young players are more athletic, and are calling them up earlier.......at least that's what I read online.
  10. If he isn't on the 40 man, and he is plan D for the OF.....great. If he's plan A for the MLB team, or is on the 40 man in November/December, I will be disappointed.
  11. Pretty certain I would have voted for Huntsman.....the part that scares me about that is giving the "freedom party that hates freedom that isn't christian freedom" control of the Congress and the WH. If I wasn't so scared of what giving the GOP full control, I 100% would have voted Huntsman had he been the nominee.
  12. Like, Moses tricked the Egyptians into enslaving his people? Is that what Carson is saying?
  13. In other news, the leading GOP presidential candidate thinks the pyramids were built by Moses, on purpose, to store grain for the jews...... And people are wanting to vote for this guy. I got no problem voting for smart Republicans, but this is unreal to me.
  14. that simply is not true.
  15. If you think Dozier is going to be "bad"*....aren't the Yankees that smart too? that said, IF the Twins think Sanchez can stick at C, and IF the Twins think Polanco is near-ready, I'd consider a deal like that. Let's be real, they aren't getting Sanchez for other prospects, good prospects aren't traded for other good prospects, it just doesn't happen. edit: I don't think he will be, btw.
  16. Move on to what?
  17. Every company does the pendulum swings, every company.
  18. No. While I respect his clubhouse work, his tactics and on field strategy never improved or changed, from what I could see. If I was a GM looking for a manager, he'd have no shot. Bench coach, to help a manager out? Maybe, but probably not that either.
  19. Dave Cameron has a great paragraph on the myth of "selling low". Teams don't rate players on one year, they rate them on how they think they can do. Teams have become much smarter of late......I agree with Dave "sell low" is mostly a myth now.
  20. I count more than 10 with a wRC+ (pick your offensive stat) at 100 or so (with 300 ABs or more). That's a lot more than 5 that can hit. Indeed, if you drop down "good hitting catcher" to 85, there are 17. Suzuki had a 66..... IIRC, last year there was a stat that more than 10 of the catchers with more WAR than Kurt joined their team AFTER he joined the Twins. Options are out there, and are every year. The Twins need to do better than bottom 5.
  21. After the last remodel, my wife insists I don't do more hard stuff. Not because I can't, but because I get stressed out, swear, and it takes forever......meantime, I could have hired someone and had a drink and relaxed. Given our current finances, the latter is the much better idea.
  22. I gotta admit, I didn't know AJ hit that well last year.....I'd certainly go that route right now.
  23. You could sub "free agent" for catcher there......every player has flaws. The job of the FO is to figure out how to put the best combination of flawed players together to win games. I would hope that they compare the catching options to each other, not some platonic catcher that largely does not exist.
×
×
  • Create New...