Here is where I come from. If they don't spend money, because a pitcher wants four million more than they are worth, and they pocket the money, that does not help fans at all. Not one bit. They could buy a pitcher, inefficiently, and still have budget room. Or, they can pocket the money, and the team is worse. No one is arguing spending 200 million, or tripling what a player is worth. I am arguing that I would rather they overspend sometimes, than pocket the money. I guess I could ask you how it is better they pocket the money, than to spend it at all? As we know, many free agent contracts don't work, and are not as efficient as other contracts. Should they only pay minimum salaries, since those are more efficient? That would be the logical conclusion some here are making.