Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

JustinCB

Verified Member
  • Posts

    226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by JustinCB

  1. Thanks! Had not heard that before.
  2. I was at that game! Think it was college night.
  3. Not even really that much of an improvement over Escobar, tbh.
  4. 88 wins is the lowest amount a team has gotten through with as a wild card since they started sending two from each league. That would require the Twins going 27-13 the rest of the way. Anybody think that's happening? Cotts is an improvement over Duensing (if that's even who they plan on replacing) but this team isn't playing nearly.700 baseball for 40 games.
  5. Your heart must get heavy a lot.
  6. Wonder if he'd do better in a market like Minnesota, where there's no demand to sign the type of sexy free agents that bombed in Boston, no budget for them in any case, and not even any expectation to win baseball games!
  7. Are you talking about just taking any given teams' number of wins above replacement level and arbitrarily dividing them among the players? Its still fundamentally an individual statistic and its usefulness is in what it tells you about a given player compared to another with a single number derived from various measures of a player's performance. You can extrapolate team performance based on cumulative player WAR but it doesn't work the other way around.
  8. For one thing, you're only accounting for batting WAR for each team. If you add Boston's pitching WAR (7) you get 22.6 for the team. If you add the Twins' team pitching WAR (10.7), you get 18.1 for them. Second thing, team WAR isn't intended to match up perfectly with team win-loss record (which shows past performance only), it's meant to fall roughly in the range between team record and pythagorean record (which is a function of runs scored and allowed, and which is a better predictor of future performance.) Pythag W%=[(Runs Scored)^1.81]/[(Runs Scored)^1.81 + (Runs Allowed)^1.81] If you plug that in for Boston (.450) you'd expect their team WAR total to fall somewhere in the range of 52 team wins and 53.1 pythag wins. B-Ref sets replacement level at .320 winning percentage (or roughly 38 replacement wins based on 118 games played so far), so if you add Boston's team WAR to that, you get about 60. For Min (.478 pythag = 57 wins compared with their actual 59 wins, and team WAR gives you 56) It's not perfect by any means, but it is useful as a rough tool for comparing the value of different players with a single metric. The Twins are right about where you'd expect them to be as a team based on WAR, and Boston is fairly significantly underperforming theirs, but like any other statistic there are almost always outliers.
  9. How exactly is mike leake the one you pick out of that group
  10. He should be ran out of town for trading a fringy prospect and a non-prospect for a halfway decent bullpen piece? Ok.
  11. How is that a "small detail"
  12. "Them" not "we." You wanna associate with this mess?
  13. Spirit of Vodka Dave agrees with me! http://twinsdaily.com/topic/3711-keith-law/?p=61749 http://twinsdaily.com/topic/11778-keith-law-mideseason-top-5-farm-systems/?p=257755
  14. Twins Daily's own Nick Nelson has been bringing it up since at least 2009 (see comment one and his response http://twinsfanatnicks.blogspot.com/2009/03/position-analysis-left-field.html) I'm not pulling this out of thin air. He's been called out on it before. See first comment on this chat he did a couple years ago. http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/21395/21395
  15. Law has never seemed like much of a Twins fan. I feel like they get discounted to some extent by the smart baseball types because they aren't sabermetrically inclined, but maybe I'm reading into it too much.
  16. They'd do best to go find a couple competent relievers. I can barely stand to watch the late innings this year.
  17. ERA north of 8 so far. Less than 10 innings but not good, at least not yet.
  18. I think in the past there's been a thread where each of the picks are listed with what they signed for, if at all. Is that still a thing and I just can't find it?
  19. "Put a fork in him."
  20. I'm sure Gardy has had a lot of forks in a lot of things lately. Lotta potato salad I bet.
  21. He did a nice job setting them up to get out of the bottom of the 9th. Thompson should never have been allowed to sniff that situation in the 10th when Perkins was available though. So net loss I guess.
×
×
  • Create New...