Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Nashvilletwin

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,804

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Nashvilletwin

  1. Nashvilletwin
    As a result of these trades are the Twins better positioned to compete in ‘28? Will any of the players acquired or the key assets kept bring any value post next year’s strike shortened season? The answer to both questions is assuredly no. Therefore, regardless of the individual trade grades, the overall grade is a solid F. Embracing delusion and short-term PR gains at the expense of building a true competitive team is precisely why the Twins under Tough Talking Tom and his minion JZ will never field a winner. Sad, but true.
  2. Nashvilletwin
    Should we expect anything different? That record is probably pretty close to what Shelton managed last season with the Pirates. lol
  3. Nashvilletwin
    Was Sabato missing his equipment tonight? If so, tough way to make your MLB debut. You work your butt off for seven years and then Delta Airlines loses your luggage. Hard to make that up.
  4. Nashvilletwin
    …..and crowded…
  5. Nashvilletwin
    100% agree. With those three in the lineup (ideally Culpepper for the last two games), plus now Sabato, the last week of the season is Must Watch TV for me. I have no particular burning desire or reason to see Lewis or Larnach take another AB as a twin - nothing against either player.
  6. Nashvilletwin
    Agree. The injuries were included in the “or whatever” part. Regardless of the reasons (and there are likely several), Lewis is simply not very good - certainly not good enough to be starting first baseman on a Twins team that is rapidly improving. It’s just time to move on - best for both parties. And that is written with a reluctance because virtually all Twins fans, myself most certainly included, wanted Lewis to be star for years to come. It was just not meant to be.
  7. Nashvilletwin
    The Twins tried very hard - very, very hard - to make Royce into the next Buxton; namely the fan favorite cornerstone of the commercial side of the equation. Sadly, it just didn’t pan out that way. Whether the Twins ruined Royce by playing him all over the diamond or whatever, the sad truth is that he cannot hit well enough or consistently enough or field extraordinarily enough to make up for the hitting deficiencies to be at least an average major leaguer. Bye Royce - best of luck to you at your new change of scenery. You need it and the Twins need it. Now they have multiple alternatives to build into that role - Culpepper, Jenkins, ERod, Keaschall. And don’t count out Houston or Lackey in the next year or two. The Twins may/should be looking at the likely strike shortened ‘27 season as an opportunity to reset out of the old and transition/invest in the new. As part of that, first base is now wide open for next season. Wide open - as it certainly should be. And Sabato is 100% one of the options. He may not end up winning the job, but he’s in the mix. And for many, he’s ahead of Lewis - as everyone knows he’s not the answer - as a possible solution.
  8. Nashvilletwin
    People were snickering at me? My fellow TDers? Wasnt the first time and certainly won’t be the last, lol.
  9. Nashvilletwin
    Might depend on how quickly the cap rolls in. Yankees might not have a ton of cap room. Maybe Jeffers likes living in MN. Who knows?
  10. Nashvilletwin
    No reason to panic. With one simple signing we can finesse our catching issues for a couple of years AND solve our first base problem for ‘29 and ‘30 when our window should be wide open. Yes, all of that can happen when we resign Jeffers Here’s the catching pipeline for the next four seasons: 2027: Jeffers, Caratini 2028: Jeffers, Jackson/Diaw/Lackey 2029: Lackey, Diaw/Tait 2030: Lackey, Tait (and going forward) Here’s the first base pipeline: 2027: Lewis, Clemens 2028: Clemens 2029: Jeffers, Tinney 2030: Jeffers, Tinney (Tinney is 1B after 2030) Here’s the DH lineup: 2027: Buxton, other outfielder 2028: Buxton, other outfielder 2029: Tinney, Jeffers, Diaw, Lackey 2030: Tinney, Jeffers, Diaw, Lackey Granted, this assumes the prospects stay on schedule. But this scenario is very plausible.
  11. Nashvilletwin
    The decision is a no-brainer: re-sign Jeffers to a 4 yr. $70MM or so deal. Jeffers is C1 in ‘27 and probably ‘28 or until Lackey is ready. After that, he starts at 1B, is DH on the other days, and is emergency C3. We will have plenty of cash with a new floor and after losing both Ryan and Lopez after the strike shortened ‘27 and Buxton after ‘28. Easy peasy.
  12. Nashvilletwin
    Jeffers - as early as ‘28 and certainly in ‘29 and 30’. Just depends on Lackey, Diaw, Tait and Tinney. The point is that re-signing Jeffers to a four year deal makes sense because after ‘28 at the latest he can make the move to 1B and won’t be holding anyone back. C’mon TDers - let’s think out of the box
  13. Nashvilletwin
    If the owners stick to their salary cap demand, I’m quite pessimistic about ‘27 being much more than a stub year. Lewis stays at 1B until Houston arrives. Then Clemens moves from 2B to a righty/lefty platoon 1B with Lewis. Both can also play some utility infield. In ‘28, ideally we see either Tinney or Diaw make their debut at 1B supported by Clemens. Lewis is gone. In ‘29 one of Tinney or Diaw is our primary 1B and the other still is on the team (DH1/DH2, C2/C3, 1B2, PH). Another alternative is we re-sign Jeffers (four year deal) and he plays 1B and DH starting in ‘29 when Lackey takes over C1 and Jeffers’ legs start to wear out. So in ‘29, Jeffers and Tinney at 1B and DH with Lackey and Diaw as C1 and C2, respectively. This is my preferred scenario.
  14. Nashvilletwin
    What if the FO and ownership had pulled their heads out of their derrières and traded Ryan and Buxton (I know, I know the NTC…give it a rest) before the ASG and Jeffers before the deadline for 3-5 legit, near-term prospects instead of pursuing a delusional transitory fan pleasing PR stunt strategy? We’d be so much deeper, we’d have more cash to spend (maybe to re-sign Jeffers, perhaps?), we’d likely have a higher draft pick, Jenkins and ERod probably would’ve got more critical ABs, etc., etc. In short, we’d be in a much better position to put an actual contending team on the field starting in ‘28 after the strike shortened season. That’s the biggest “What If” from this season. Everything else was more or less predictable.
  15. Nashvilletwin
    Catching plan 1.0: 1. Re-sign Jeffers to a 3 yr. deal 2. Bring Lackey up in ‘28 to pair with Jeffers. 3. Tinney becomes our 1B in ‘28 or ‘29 4. Trade Tait after the ‘27 season. 5. Diaw joins the big club in ‘28 or ‘29 as 3rd catcher and back up OF. 6. Jimenez stays in the system as a C through ‘29 and then we reassess when Jeffer goes. Maybe he’s a backup C in ‘29 if Jeffers is traded before the season or at the deadline. 7. If Jimenez doesn’t make it, no big whoop. Diaw is C #2. 8. By ‘29 the Twins could have four of the five on the big league roster with Lackey and Jimenez as the main #1 and #2, respectively. Tinney is at 1B and Diaw is OF #4-5 - but both can catch if called upon. We maximize the value for Tait - the one guy, other than Lackey, who can bring back some real value - as we head into our open window in ‘28. Seems fairly straightforward.
  16. Nashvilletwin
    Amen!
  17. Nashvilletwin
    Why? So we can chase another delusional playoff spot in a strike shortened season? So we can postpone the development of one of our key future cogs? The kid needs ABs against major league pitching. All the young guys do. Look at how Lee and Keaschall responded this year as they started to accumulate ABs. Just for once, this inept franchise needs to pull their heads out of their rear ends and invest for the future. Play the young guys. Build for the future. They’ve mangled their ability to trade their best assets already.
  18. Nashvilletwin
    Keaschall (LF), ERod (RF), Jenkins (CF), Buxton (DH, 4th OF), Martin (5th OF, late inning sub, PR). Gonzalez and Rhoden are the first OF call ups. Larnach is gone. Just make the investment and play that lineup every day possible during the strike shortened ‘27 season. It’s not complicated. Btw, except for 1B, the infield isn’t complicated either. Lee (3B), Culpepper (SS), Clemens (2B). When Houston arrives, he plays SS, Culpepper moves to 2B, and Clemens either goes to 1B (if Lewis is still in that role) or is utility IF #1/DH/PH. Kreidler is fine as utility IF #2. Re-sign Jeffers (C) to a three-year deal; Caratini is C2 until one of the prospects (Diaw or Lackey) arrives (likely not until ‘28). Those are our 13 position players/DH. Other than figuring out what to do with Lewis and 1B, is that so hard?
  19. Nashvilletwin
    Except for Buxton as DH, ideally for the next couple of weeks we see our 2027 (whenever we have baseball in 2027, lol) starting lineup: Outfield: Keaschall (LF), Jenkins (CF), ERod (RF) Infield: Lee (3B), Culpepper (SS), Clemens (2B), Lewis (1B) Catcher: Jeffers (re-signed) DH: Buxton (platooning as the 4th outfielder) Lewis is the most at risk not to be part of that lineup. Ideally the Twins upgrade at 1B over the off-season. When Houston is brought up late in the season, Culpepper moves to 2B and Clemens either gets innings at 1B (Lewis stays) or is the primary utility player (infield and outfield) along with Martin. Future looks bright fellow TDers.
  20. Nashvilletwin
    I’d give Sabato a few games at 1B and let Lewis take a seat.
  21. Nashvilletwin
    Injury complaints are for losers. Period. See the Twins and Vikings.
  22. Nashvilletwin
    Old man Pohlad was a ruthless businessman - you have to give him that. His kids are slick talking knuckleheads who can’t carry their father’s jock.
  23. Nashvilletwin
    To answer the question in the headline:
  24. Nashvilletwin
    I was really railing on the article and that you sadly, but correctly, identified that Buxton was “higher on the list” for the Twins. By no means was I attacking nor indicting you. Sorry.
  25. Nashvilletwin
    Only a team as inept as the Twins would think Buxton has more value than ERod. No team in their right mind would trade the upside of ERod for 1.5 years of an aging, surgery required 33 year old Buxton. It’s not even close. The only team dumb enough to give up on ERod so Buxton can play another hundred or so games in his age 34 and 35 seasons before retiring would be the Twins. Talk about asinine…. If there is any truth in this article, God help us Twins fans.
×
×
  • Create New...