If spending $ vs winning was the object of an MLB franchise, I would totally agree with this article. However, here are 1000 words to describe a little told fact: The size of the payroll does not correlate well to winning. (.500 record is 324 on the above graph.) Indeed Payroll is Resource Allocation. The Twins have X dollars to spend every year, just like every corporation. They have been allocating resources in revamping their minor league systems, the player development strategy and infrastructure, they built a new academy in the DR and state of the art facilities at Fort Myers, and added a whole bunch of people in the baseball operations and scouting parts of the game. Those are asset allocations as well, and if I were to bet (need to find a graph), organizational/farm strength correlates better with wins (albeit future wins, as a lead indicator) than MLB payroll. For one, I am not interesting on how much $ the Twins are spending on MLB players, I am interested in them winning. And it has been a while...