You know who talked about impeachment the most? Fox News. Know why? Because their viewers hated hearing about it. Didn't matter if it was a council member from the city of Seattle, or AOC... It was a way to vilify liberals, libtards, democrats, whatever you want to call them.... and keep the focus off Trump, off the facts, off the real investigation, and on something people can see as an enemy. CNN rarely talked about impeachment for the whole investigation... and when it was brought up, the journalists challenged it. Had there been a smoking gun, we would be taking openly about impeachment... or should be, but I doubt republicans would go through with it. There wasn't for conspiracy of treason, but there still might be for obstruction of justice. The obstruction case is actually what I most often heard CNN say has the most merit, and could be where impeachment comes from. The media wouldn't have discussed the Trump Russia collusion nearly as much had Trump acted like a normal innocent person and not constantly attacked the process. They had every right to ask why, but did waste a lot of time doing so. Steve Bannon was on Anderson Cooper tonight and they discussed some issues happening in China. I wish our news focused more on those types of topics rather than interpreting Trump tweets constantly. I mean, I think it is fine to bring it up, but don't have a while panel go back and forth for 10 minutes on some meaningless tweet. That is what I despise about CNN.